Started By
Message
locked post

Joe Sloan...Last night changed my opinion of him in a big way.

Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:29 am
Posted by itsbigmikey
NASHVILLE
Member since Aug 2018
447 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:29 am
Was a little indifferent/skeptical about him as an OC but the creativity and ability to keep the Clemson defense off balance were fully on display.

Feels like the amount of wrinkles in this offense will make it really tough for defenses to game plan against. We got creative with quick screens and formations, utilized the speed of our WR’s, let Nuss pull a few, etc. It didn’t feel like we were limited in any way and you could tell Clemson was on their heels quite a bit. Score didn’t show how dominate this was and I think the offense is going to do big numbers this year.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 8:33 am
Posted by OJsLifeCoach
NYC
Member since Aug 2023
2817 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:35 am to
Let’s not suck his dick too quick.

As soon as we had the lead we applied the same shite we did in the past, playing not to lose.

Absolutely hated the calls on the last couple drives, essentially conceding giving them the ball back.

But it worked out, so let’s keep getting better.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
25639 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:36 am to
Committed to the run, and creative play calling. We didn’t see that last year.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7464 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:37 am to
Night and day difference between halves. Maybe Sloan went conservative in the first half to determine how well the new line could perform?
I HATED the first half calls. LOVED second half calls...particularly the same play three times in a row to take advantage of personnel mismatch.
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
33975 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:37 am to
Yeah the play calling the last 2 drives drove me insane. But I loved the 3 bubble screens in a row
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by Sull
Tulip, LA
Member since Aug 2006
3918 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:37 am to
Come up with another analogy. Good grief
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7464 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:39 am to
quote:

utilized the speed of our WR’s


This is my only disagreement. Maybe Clemson was dropping two deep to stop this though.
Posted by Bedtiger
Thibodaux
Member since Dec 2018
465 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:39 am to
Good enough to win, which is huge but still more conservative than I would like to see. Congrats coaches. Sloan was good, Baker was great and BK dropped the ball by not taking the points before half!
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6234 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:41 am to
It was a better 2nd half in play calling. Getting a rhythm and creating mis direction and mismatches that wssnt happening in 1st half.

I was really mad about the last 2 drives for putting the pressure on our D instead of trying seal the deal. I understand burning clock and sticking ground plays but it was way too conservative.
But i think that is more on Kelly for that decision
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6855 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:41 am to
My only complaint was how we finished the game. I would have preferred to see more aggressive play calling.

We had them on the ropes, needed a kill shot.
Posted by itsbigmikey
NASHVILLE
Member since Aug 2018
447 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:42 am to
We were just behind the chains too much. Ball didn’t bounce our way all night
Posted by mjax57
Vinings, GA
Member since Mar 2012
4684 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Absolutely hated the calls on the last couple drives, essentially conceding giving them the ball back.


Don’t necessarily think we conceded, one drive took about 5 mins off the clock. Did we not see that defense? You lean on that unit when they are playing like that. We haven’t won that type of game in the BK era ever.

Nuss was brilliant imo, protected the ball and played within the team. The WRs gotta get separation, they were getting blanketed at times.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 8:47 am
Posted by itsbigmikey
NASHVILLE
Member since Aug 2018
447 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:45 am to
quote:

This is my only disagreement. Maybe Clemson was dropping two deep to stop this though


I meant more of just getting them the ball quickly and using zavion in the run game. We have room to improve for sure but it just feels like the playbook is bigger this year with much more opportunities to find ways to exploit defenses
Posted by patchesohoulihan_007
Member since Jul 2015
2794 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:49 am to
The first half was disappointing and had me thinking it would be another brutal year of terrible play calling.

But they made adjustments and the second half was inspired. Multiple times getting Clemson defense moving one way only to move the ball the opposite.

That little decoy/delayed screen where the slot receiver dummy’s a block then runs a drag was great.

Beat them for big yards twice and the third time it would have been a TD, but they had a late whistle for a false start.
Posted by FournetteForEver7
Member since Nov 2015
2457 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:49 am to
Did you like that 3rd and 9 hand off, coming of out of a timeout on the first drive? I thought that was extremely creative 2 yard pickup.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7464 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:51 am to
Agree
Posted by LSUBS88
Member since Sep 2010
926 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:54 am to
clock mgt, bubble screens and play selection

tht les was back on the sidelines again

please dont make us wait till 1min left to celebrate when we dominate again

Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
2961 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:54 am to


Night and day difference between halves. Maybe Sloan went conservative in the first half to determine how well the new line could perform?
I HATED the first half calls. LOVED second half calls...particularly the same play three times in a row to take advantage of personnel mismatch.
_____


Disagree on first half. I thought play calling was good most of the game. We occasionally played it safe in both halves. But you could tell this was a statement of committing to the run. I think he challenged the Oline to make running lanes and they did. I hope some stud high school Oline guys were watching. This is how a good Oline wants a game to be called.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45547 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:55 am to
Defense bailed him out, especially after the early turnover where they only got the field goal

We’re lucky it wasn’t 17 zip or Moore Clemson by halftime.

So my opinion after the game is, he’s possibly capable, but planning the conservative slow start is gonna kill us like it had in the last five openers.
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
12773 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:56 am to
The delayed screen pass to Aaron Anderson in the middle is a money play. I’m pretty sure we had a TD using that play but a timeout was called.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram