- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fed Appeals Court rules most Trump tariffs illegal, next step Supreme Court
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:45 pm
LINK
I wish these courts found Obamacare illegal.
quote:
A federal appeals court ruled Friday that most of President Donald Trump’s global tariffs are illegal, striking a massive blow to the core of his aggressive trade policy
A panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the law Trump invoked when he granted his most expansive tariffs does not actually grant him the power to impose those levies.
I wish these courts found Obamacare illegal.
This post was edited on 8/29/25 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:46 pm to slackster
lol


This post was edited on 8/29/25 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:47 pm to slackster
quote:
A federal appeals court ruled Friday that most of President Donald Trump’s global tariffs are illegal
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:48 pm to slackster
You think the SCOTUS dares go head to head with Trump on this one? They won’t because Trump won’t abide and they would look weak.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:49 pm to slackster
quote:
I wish these courts found Obamacare illegal.
Funny how that worked.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:51 pm to slackster
“But it’s legal biological men can play in women’s sports if they identify as female “
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:55 pm to slackster
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to lay and collect tariffs with Congress. The Founding Fathers intended for legislative oversight on taxation, tariffs, and related financial matters, viewing tariffs as strategic levers to be used with caution and prudence.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 4:57 pm to slackster
Nobody else is reporting this
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:00 pm to Robcrzy
quote:
Nobody else is reporting this
Tigerdroppings is the breaking news now...
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:06 pm to Aubie Spr96
You may want to follow the acts passed by Congress that ended up give that power to the executive.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:07 pm to Padme
quote:
They won’t because Trump won’t abide
Why wouldn't he?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:09 pm to Powerman
Because he is ok with Trump being above the law
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:09 pm to Robcrzy
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:09 pm to slackster
Is this another left leaning court?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:09 pm to Robcrzy
quote:
Nobody else is reporting this
You turn on the news? I'm watching it at a bar ... LOL
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:11 pm to Powerman
Why would he, bottom?
It’s a pillar of his presidency, what does he gain by kowtowing?
It’s a pillar of his presidency, what does he gain by kowtowing?
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:12 pm to slackster
Fed judges have really proven to have this Country's back and all it's legal Citizens.
How rotten our infrastructure is...global epidemic... Barbarians at the Gate, traitors within.
How rotten our infrastructure is...global epidemic... Barbarians at the Gate, traitors within.
Posted on 8/29/25 at 5:14 pm to Padme
quote:
Why would he, bottom?
Because then he'd be violating the law. That is a line that would deserve impeachment and likely removal.
Could the Senate go to 60 for removal? Maybe not.
Popular
Back to top

22












