- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Clemson snitched but I guarantee Houston passed the info along
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:35 pm
Houston got the official clarification that Haulcy was ejected for fighting in after the game in 2024… Clemson didnt just dream up that info, someone passed it along and purposefully waited this long…
Houston’s sports information director confirmed the ejection was for fighting (this was before BK even had his press conference).
Guarantee you Houston is still salty about AJ transferring and decided stick it to him/LSU
Houston’s sports information director confirmed the ejection was for fighting (this was before BK even had his press conference).
Guarantee you Houston is still salty about AJ transferring and decided stick it to him/LSU
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 7:46 pm
14
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:36 pm to 7Tiger7
Can’t really blame Houston honestly
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:38 pm to 7Tiger7
I don’t get “ Clemson snitched.”
The ruling was made 8 months ago. The fact that Clemson knew the LsU player was ineligible to play the first half, but LSU didn’t (if that’s true), should be the most concerning part of all of this.
The ruling was made 8 months ago. The fact that Clemson knew the LsU player was ineligible to play the first half, but LSU didn’t (if that’s true), should be the most concerning part of all of this.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:41 pm to Roscoe
A Clemson “reporter” “broke” the story. How did he suddenly find that out a couple of days before the game. Someone fed him that info and guess who knew the official ejection ruling info in 2024… Houston
This post was edited on 8/28/25 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:42 pm to 7Tiger7
quote:This is life in the big city. I can't imagine being a pussy big enough to feel aggrieved by big time CFB programs using cutthroat tactics.
Clemson snitched but I guarantee Houston passed the info along
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 pm to Roscoe
quote:
The fact that Clemson knew the LsU player was ineligible to play the first half, but LSU didn’t (if that’s true), should be the most concerning part of all of this.
Why?
Haulcy himself wasn't notified, which should be illegal.
It's clear that UH was holding this just to frick with Haulcy, and they should be sued.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 pm to Roscoe
quote:Why are you ignoring tons of evidence?
I don’t get “ Clemson snitched.”
The ruling was made 8 months ago. The fact that Clemson knew the LsU player was ineligible to play the first half, but LSU didn’t (if that’s true), should be the most concerning part of all of this.
Houston coaching staff knew after they were informed via letter from the Big 12. They did not tell Haulcey.
It's more likely than not that Houston (mad about their best player leaving them high and dry) told Clemson, and Clemson (confirmed) reported it to the NCAA.
It is not, in the slightest bit, "concerning" that LSU was unaware of the suspension.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:43 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:Uh you 100% can. They never told Haulcey.
Can’t really blame Houston honestly
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:44 pm to 7Tiger7
Better to sit him than play him and be forced to forfeit the game.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:44 pm to 7Tiger7
This is better than playing an ineligible player and having it discovered after the fact.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:47 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
This is better than playing an ineligible player and having it discovered after the fact.
Is it? They couldn't penalize anyone of no one knew anything...
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:48 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
It is not, in the slightest bit, "concerning" that LSU was unaware of the suspension
Since LSU is apparently getting screwed two days before the season opener without knowing, it is actually concerning that the NCAA or some party doesn't have to notify schools about players who will be suspended in any fashion for the season opener well in advance of the season.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:50 pm to Big EZ Tiger
quote:
it is actually concerning that the NCAA or some party doesn't have to notify schools about players who will be suspended in any fashion
This is exactly why their arbitrary regulatory enforcement should be tested in court.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:50 pm to 7Tiger7
Clemson is so stupid
They could have got a forfeit if they waited till after they lost the game
They could have got a forfeit if they waited till after they lost the game
Posted on 8/28/25 at 7:59 pm to nicholastiger
Are you fkn serious? I know you arent all there, but this is unreal. Has that ever happened before? You are unhinged everyone knows, but this, man...
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:06 pm to 7Tiger7
It’s possible. But I also think it’s possible that somebody from Clemson started doing a deep dive when NC State made it known that they would have two players suspended stemming from those bowl game ejections (this was made known earlier this week). Cooley was also ejected, which drew Clemson’s attention. So they started digging and found out about the Haulcy ejection too. They reported both of them.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:07 pm to 7Tiger7
Im gonna agree with this even if it's not true...Bastards!!!
Posted on 8/28/25 at 8:08 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Clemson is so stupid
They could have got a forfeit if they waited till after they lost the game
That's not how that works. If they forfeit after Clemson loses then it erased LSUs win and Clemson keeps the loss.
Posted on 8/28/25 at 9:58 pm to 7Tiger7
If losing one player for one half makes that much difference we’re in trouble !
Posted on 8/28/25 at 10:45 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
It is not, in the slightest bit, "concerning" that LSU was unaware of the suspension.
I disagree. If I'm a coach or staff and I'm preparing to play a big game and my opponent knows something about a player on my team that I don't know, that's a concern. If they know that, what else do they know about my team that I don't know?
Big 12 sent their letter in early December 2024.
quote:
It's more likely than not that Houston (mad about their best player leaving them high and dry) told Clemson, and Clemson (confirmed) reported it to the NCAA.
This is speculation. it's not fact. Houston probably was at least disappointed.
I guarantee you that there is someone in LSU's compliance department who is sweating bullets right now because we didn't do our full due diligence.
Houston could have told Haulcy - he was there 5+ months after the decision.
Houston could have told LSU.
NCAA Clearninghouse could have flagged it when approving the transfer.
Compliance could have requested ALL Big 12 docs associated with the player.
There are are so many points where the information could have been collected. that we don't know until now is mind boggling.
The good news is that it's only 1 player for 1 half. So, it doesn't mean we can't win the game, but IMO LSU looks bad in this situation and as an alumni and supporter, that's a concern.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News