Started By
Message
locked post

Danny Etling...What is the tRant’s opinion overall of this QB?

Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:27 am
Posted by ShipperJosh
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Sep 2020
89 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:27 am
What is the tRant’s opinion overall of this QB? I feel that he was a serviceable QB in the Mile’s era. He wasn’t great, but we leaned heavy on the run in those years with Fournette and Guice as the RB in those years.. I know he only averaged around 200 yards per game, but he didn’t throw many INT. We all know Les wasn’t ever going to pass much after the JJ/JL debacle (Mett was an outlier).

Interested to hear y’all’s thoughts..
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 1:27 am
Posted by The Real Drooby
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
1566 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:35 am to
Was above average and a class act
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51498 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:40 am to
I think Etling was the best QB of the Miles era, and I’m not forgetting Mett.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3043 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:40 am to
He was a breath of fresh air compared to the days of Anthony of Jennings and Brandon Harris who preceded him.
Posted by crotiger0307
Utah
Member since Jan 2018
832 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 12:43 am to
quote:

I think Etling was the best QB of the Miles era, and I’m not forgetting Mett.
go to bed bruh
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51498 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:17 am to
quote:

go to bed bruh

Just woke up in England.

I have grandkids with funny accents crawling all over me.
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 1:18 am
Posted by mike4lsu
Baton Rouge,LA
Member since Sep 2005
1977 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:35 am to
quote:

I think Etling was the best QB of the Miles era, and I’m not forgetting Mett.


I guess JaMarcus Russel and Matt Flynn do not count.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39151 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:45 am to
quote:

 think Etling was the best QB of the Miles era, and I’m not forgetting Mett


That is dumb.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51498 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:46 am to
quote:

I guess JaMarcus Russel and Matt Flynn do not count.

You’re dead right about Flynn and Russell. I forgot about them.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
16601 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 3:24 am to
His offensive coordinators in his 2 seasons as a starter here were Cam Cameron (fired 4 games into his 1st year along with Les and his bullshite) and Matt Canada. That’s as bad a coaching situation as it realistically gets. Add that while not terrible, his targets were below the traditional WRU standard (Dupre, Chark, Dural, Gage, Sullivan)

"He wasn't great" is arguably insulting considering he was not remotely set up for success. Not sure many of the good QBs in the SEC at the time (Lock, Fromm, Stidham, Hurts) would have fared any better. He was never going to lead the conference in passing but history will continue to trend kinder on his legacy
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 6:47 am
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
25246 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 4:15 am to
I feel like he would be remembered a lot more had Burrow not arrived right after him.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
25767 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:06 am to
Underrated. Put him with any real OC and he’s up there with the others that year.
Posted by sicboy
Member since Nov 2010
79102 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:22 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94560 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:25 am to
Smart player, hard worker, great kid

I'm not sure you could win a championship with a team full of Danny Etlings, but you wouldn't have off-the-field problems, academic problems, drug problems, etc., that come with more talented players.

And you would win a lot of games by outsmarting/outworking the opposition.

Bottom line: I got no complaints about Danny Etling.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
56543 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:28 am to
Average college QB but he was perfect to help make the transition into a newer offense. He could do a little bit of everything and was coachable.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
18609 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:51 am to
Mauck like
Posted by 41bengal
Da' Ville
Member since Jun 2009
2109 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 5:58 am to
I'll disagree about not having targets.. Chark was good when the offense was changed to actually throw down the field.. Dural did have moments when he wasn't hurt.. Dupre was a disappointment.. Sullivan was a tweener that was lost in the shuffle..
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
6501 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 6:09 am to
quote:

I'll disagree about not having targets.. Chark was good when the offense was changed to actually throw down the field.. Dural did have moments when he wasn't hurt.. Dupre was a disappointment.. Sullivan was a tweener that was lost in the shuffle..


Your own description of his targets basically lays out exactly what he said about them.:

quote:

While not terrible, his targets were simply not at the WRU standard (Dupre, Chark, Dural, Gage, Sullivan)
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4669 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 6:13 am to
He was actually really good, just stuck in a really shitty coaching situation.

Who knows what he would’ve developed into given a more stable environment.

What I’ll never forget about him is that the kids was tough as nails! He took so many shots over the course of 2017 and showed true toughness getting up off the turf.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 5:44 am
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41167 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 6:56 am to
One of many potential great QB's that the serpent (Les) bit. What a shame.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram