- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Working out and on Wegovy, no weight loss.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 9:49 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 9:49 am
Just like the title said. I started Wegovy 0.25mg a few weeks back and been at the gym for 2 months now. Started out upper 250's, came down to around 244 and hovering for the last two weeks. This despite, reduced food intake, trying to focus on protein intake, hydration. Snacking greatly reduced. Still will occasional coke, maybe a 20 oz bottle every 2-3 days.
I'm usually in the gym 4 days a week. Getting 20-25 min of cardio for warmup and cooldown. Using a lot of cable exercises, but dumbells for chest press, curls, shoulders etc. Not seeing a tremendous amount of muscle gain, but arms and chest are feeling more muscular. Also, forgot to mention, I'm working on legs once or twice a week with leg presses, hack squats, curls etc.
Could muscle gain account for slower weight loss despite being on a GLP-1? Granted I'm on the lowest dose until next month, but I feel like I've greatly reduced food intake and my cravings for sweets and other snacks are reduced as well.
I'm usually in the gym 4 days a week. Getting 20-25 min of cardio for warmup and cooldown. Using a lot of cable exercises, but dumbells for chest press, curls, shoulders etc. Not seeing a tremendous amount of muscle gain, but arms and chest are feeling more muscular. Also, forgot to mention, I'm working on legs once or twice a week with leg presses, hack squats, curls etc.
Could muscle gain account for slower weight loss despite being on a GLP-1? Granted I'm on the lowest dose until next month, but I feel like I've greatly reduced food intake and my cravings for sweets and other snacks are reduced as well.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:25 am to BluegrassCardinal
Your body is likely going through recomposition to some degree. You're possibly gaining muscle mass, which is denser than fat, while losing fat.
2 months of lifestyle change is a drop in the bucket of drastic health/fitness change. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Keep going and you will start to realize better physical and mental gains.
Cut out the snacks, cut out the coke, make real progress. How serious are you about your goals? A little serious? Keep the snacking and cokes.
2 months of lifestyle change is a drop in the bucket of drastic health/fitness change. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Keep going and you will start to realize better physical and mental gains.
Cut out the snacks, cut out the coke, make real progress. How serious are you about your goals? A little serious? Keep the snacking and cokes.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:31 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:Possibly, but probably not
Could muscle gain account for slower weight loss despite being on a GLP-1?
quote:You need to track it religiously until you know what your intake is. It is more likely you are still over eating if you aren’t seeing results on a GLP1.
but I feel like I've greatly reduced food intake
Also, if you are serious about weight loss, don’t drink calories unless in a protein shake with a good protein to calorie ratio.
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 10:32 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:39 am to BluegrassCardinal
Are you tracking calories correctly? I feel like when I started lifting weights a few years ago, I was hungrier than ever. It wasn’t until I tracked every calorie that I put in my mouth that the scale started moving significantly. And I agree with the above….don't drink your calories! That can be a huge sabotage to your progress.
You could be in a recomp mode, but it’s likely your calorie intake that’s stalling you.
You could be in a recomp mode, but it’s likely your calorie intake that’s stalling you.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 11:08 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
Still will occasional coke, maybe a 20 oz bottle every 2-3 days.
50% of the time isn’t occasional. Also, 750 calories a week and nearly 200g of sugar
quote:
Snacking greatly reduced
So still snacking
You’re drinking and snacking like a pound a week of fatloss… thems just the facts
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 11:08 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:56 pm to BluegrassCardinal
Are you drinking “any” alcohol?
I’ve been taking Zepbound and found that if I drank any alcohol my weight loss would stop for a week.
I’ve been taking Zepbound and found that if I drank any alcohol my weight loss would stop for a week.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 2:14 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Also, 750 calories a week and nearly 200g of sugar
Brutal. I am always amazed at how people don’t correlate coke, or orange juice for that matter, to weight gain.
You can’t mainline sugar if you want to have decent body composition. (Well you can but boy are you making it difficult)
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 7/16/25 at 2:24 pm to BluegrassCardinal
If you’re going through a recomposition, your clothes will fit much differently even though you’re weighing around the same.
Also… cut out all the sugar and crap until you hit your goal weight
Also… cut out all the sugar and crap until you hit your goal weight
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:36 pm to BluegrassCardinal
If you track your protein intake, and try to meet the goals they set for you, it's nearly impossible to snack. After force feeding yourself that much protein, you start to feel like a goose being raised for foie gras.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:42 pm to BluegrassCardinal
You need to add at minimum a waist measurement when doing these sorts of things. You can lose inches and not weight when recomping.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 5:53 pm to BluegrassCardinal
Track every piece of food that goes into your mouth, don’t drink your calories (easily swap that coke for a Coke Zero), weigh out your portions. You’re likely eating/drinking way more than you think.
And you’ll be amazing how fast those snacks add up on calories
Put in the 100% effort and work with the GLPs and you’ll see changes quickly.
And you’ll be amazing how fast those snacks add up on calories
Put in the 100% effort and work with the GLPs and you’ll see changes quickly.
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 7/16/25 at 6:19 pm to Uncle JackD
quote:
Put in the 100% effort and you’ll see changes quickly.
FIFY
Posted on 7/16/25 at 7:10 pm to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
his despite, reduced food intake, trying to focus on protein intake, hydration. Snacking greatly reduced. Still will occasional coke, maybe a 20 oz bottle every 2-3 days.
track your calories. pretty simple
Posted on 7/16/25 at 8:38 pm to BluegrassCardinal
1. Figure out your at rest BMR (this is the number of calories your body burns a day). Just google BMR calculator to do this. Add in the additional number of calories burned exercising.
2. Track the calories you eat/drink a day
3. Lose weight. Assuming calories eaten are less than calories burned, you will lose weight. It’s really as simple as that…. Approx. 3500 calories is 1 lb.
Example: my body burns about 2000 calories a day even if I did nothing all day. I exercise and usually burn about 400 additional calories. Adding these two numbers together is ~2400 calories my body burns a day … if I eat less than 2400 calories a day, I will lose weight. If I eat more than 2400 calories in a day, I will gain weight. When the difference (added up over a couple days) is about 3500 calories, I will have lost approx. 1 lb. In my case, when I’m being good/consistent on my diet, I eat roughly 1500 calories. If I do that over 7 days and keep my calories burned at 2400 I will lose about 2lbs in the week. (2400-1500) x 7 days = 6300 … 6300/3500 = 1.8 lbs
There are certainly other fluctuating/temporary considerations in weight (building muscle, bloating, pooping, time of weighing), but in the long run calories is really all that matters when trying to lose weight. Eat less calories than your body burns, and you will lose weight. Eat more calories than your body burns, and you will gain weight.
Many people don’t track calories and have no idea of the their own math here, but it’s all simple math
2. Track the calories you eat/drink a day
3. Lose weight. Assuming calories eaten are less than calories burned, you will lose weight. It’s really as simple as that…. Approx. 3500 calories is 1 lb.
Example: my body burns about 2000 calories a day even if I did nothing all day. I exercise and usually burn about 400 additional calories. Adding these two numbers together is ~2400 calories my body burns a day … if I eat less than 2400 calories a day, I will lose weight. If I eat more than 2400 calories in a day, I will gain weight. When the difference (added up over a couple days) is about 3500 calories, I will have lost approx. 1 lb. In my case, when I’m being good/consistent on my diet, I eat roughly 1500 calories. If I do that over 7 days and keep my calories burned at 2400 I will lose about 2lbs in the week. (2400-1500) x 7 days = 6300 … 6300/3500 = 1.8 lbs
There are certainly other fluctuating/temporary considerations in weight (building muscle, bloating, pooping, time of weighing), but in the long run calories is really all that matters when trying to lose weight. Eat less calories than your body burns, and you will lose weight. Eat more calories than your body burns, and you will gain weight.
Many people don’t track calories and have no idea of the their own math here, but it’s all simple math
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:53 am to BluegrassCardinal
My sister and I both lost about a pound the first month. I think I lost two or three in the first 6 weeks of taking Zepbound. I'd been working out 5-6 days a week, doing weights and cardio, for about 4 years when I started the glp-1 option. I could see a composition change in that first month and a half, though, despite the static weight. Then the weight started to melt off. You'll likely still plateau occasionally, but stick with it, eat right, get rid of sugar, track calories.
An doc told me they had seen research that says you have to be a constant weight for about 3 years for your body's metabolism to reset. The working out and maintenance meds are long-term; not like a diet.
An doc told me they had seen research that says you have to be a constant weight for about 3 years for your body's metabolism to reset. The working out and maintenance meds are long-term; not like a diet.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:22 am to shspanthers
quote:
An doc told me they had seen research that says you have to be a constant weight for about 3 years for your body's metabolism to reset.
quote:
maintenance meds are long-term
At least they didn’t lie about this part
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:32 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
An doc told me they had seen research that says you have to be a constant weight for about 3 years for your body's metabolism to reset.
Do you have any reason or evidence to doubt this?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:34 am to shspanthers
quote:
Do you have any reason or evidence to doubt this?
Look up reverse dieting
And it fundamentally makes no sense anyway. If you are 300lbs and have a bmr of 3k and lose 120lbs your bmr isn’t still going to be 3k calories. That defies thermodynamics
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 7/17/25 at 10:18 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Look up reverse dieting
And it fundamentally makes no sense anyway. If you are 300lbs and have a bmr of 3k and lose 120lbs your bmr isn’t still going to be 3k calories. That defies thermodynamics
I looked up reverse dieting, and I don't see how it contradicts my point. It looks like it's something you'd add after reaching a goal weight to help reset the metabolism, right?
Could you elaborate on the bmr statement? I don't think I understand. Your bmr is determined by multiple factors, like hormones, age, body composition, and it's certainly possible it could be 3k or higher whether you weight 300lbs or 150lbs.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 10:21 am to shspanthers
quote:
I looked up reverse dieting, and I don't see how it contradicts my point. It looks like it's something you'd add after reaching a goal weight to help reset the metabolism, right?
So you can reset your metabolism via reverse dieting but it also takes 3 years for your metabolism to “reset,” whatever that means?
Popular
Back to top

20








