Started By
Message

What kind of person is against the thought of able bodied having to work some for benefits

Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:19 am
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
14234 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:19 am
That's my question.

Which one of you thinks it's a problem to expect an able-bodied adult to have to put in a few hours of work to qualify for benefits? They don't even have to work full-time. What is your problem with that?
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
9362 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:19 am to
Only the lazy are.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 9:20 am
Posted by TechBullDawg
Member since May 2014
2006 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:20 am to
Full time dependency is the goal
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
25984 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:20 am to
Easy. They need the indolent vote.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70124 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:20 am to
Lazy scum


Aka democrat votwrs
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12441 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

They don't even have to work full-time. What is your problem with that?


They don't even have to *work*... I believe I read it is an 80hr/mo working OR volunteering.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18752 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:21 am to
Democrats that rely of the votes of degenerates.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13389 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
I don’t think many would be against it. Democrats and the media will just use it to make stupid people think they will lose their medical coverage if Republicans pass their bill.

If we had a halfway honest media arguments like this wouldn’t exist.

Posted by Mushroom1968
Member since Jun 2023
5165 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
It's the flavor of the day. Egg prices, Iran, social security, stock market, India/Pakistan, etc. It's just something they scream about, and then when Americans realize it wasn't doomsday like libs and media screamed, they move on to something else. Nobody truly has a problem with people on Medicaid needing to work; they just pretend to have a problem. The media tells them what to pretend to be concerned about.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
10972 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
“Moderate” women like 4cubbies
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
24402 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
Lazy arse, free-loading, good for nothing, SOBs.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

What kind of person is against the thought of able bodied having to work some for benefits
imagine working 40 hours a week at 10 bucks an hour. then imagine receiving 70% of those wages for zero hours of work. Which one would you take?

work for 40 and get 400

or sit on your arse for 40 and make 280 plus food stamps and every other gov program
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
12796 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:22 am to
Cradle to grave
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30517 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:23 am to
quote:

They don't even have to work full-time.


This is my problem with it...

Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
16898 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:23 am to
Lazy is one thing but purposefully extracting money from others because because you don’t want to work is outright selfish
Posted by Enfuego
Uptown
Member since Mar 2009
9951 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:24 am to
These are the same folks that thing voter IDs are racist.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57653 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

What kind of person is against the thought of able bodied having to work some for benefits


-The lazy who would be subject to such a change.
-The lazy of thought who simply want to only look at the surface level of something.
-Those who are so worthless that the only way they can find any relevance for themselves is by being a shite-stirrer for the support of ultimately negative things (which insures they continue to have relevance).

Society is better off without any/all of them.
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
8548 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:26 am to
In the Progressive world view, one should only be judged if they are white straight male, conservative, and/or Christian.

Anything else (potential Dem voters) is off-limits and we are just being mean for even questioning it.
Posted by Aguga
Member since Aug 2021
3594 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:26 am to
It’s about fraud. I know several people who are in $1M+ houses whose kids have been covered by Medicaid for 10+ years because they were preemie. Kids are fine of course and the parents take lots of nice vacations with the savings this allows them.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47771 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 9:26 am to
This is the population the Democrats want - at least enough of them to give them complete ballot control in all future elections.

communism period = because it has worked so well in the past.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram