- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who do you think was pound for pound the strongest cartoon character and why?
Posted on 6/28/25 at 1:55 am
Posted on 6/28/25 at 1:55 am
(no message)
Posted on 6/28/25 at 1:59 am to Breesus
I was gonna say popeye but grok is right, hes probably 150-200lbs.
Grok says the warners from animaniacs although i have no clue who that is
Grok says the warners from animaniacs although i have no clue who that is
quote:
Determining the "pound for pound" strongest cartoon character is tricky since it implies comparing strength relative to size or weight, but most cartoons don’t provide precise metrics for this. Still, based on feats of strength, implied power, and relative size, **Yakko, Wakko, and Dot Warner** from *Animaniacs* stand out as top contenders.
### Why the Warners?
- **Size and Weight**: The Warners are tiny, toon-like kids, likely weighing less than 50 pounds each. Their small stature makes their feats even more impressive when judged "pound for pound."
- **Strength Feats**: In *Animaniacs* (1993–1998) and its reboot, the Warners regularly perform absurd, reality-defying acts. They’ve lifted objects like anvils, pianos, and even entire buildings with ease (e.g., in "The Sound of Warners," they casually toss around massive props). They also overpower much larger characters, like security guards or villains, with minimal effort.
- **Toon Physics Advantage**: Their strength operates under "toon force," a cartoon logic where physical limits are irrelevant. They can stretch, squash, or manipulate reality (e.g., pulling mallets from nowhere or surviving explosions), making their effective strength limitless despite their size.
- **Versatility**: Unlike characters tied to specific powers (e.g., Superman’s Kryptonian strength), the Warners’ abilities are unbound by consistent rules, letting them adapt to any challenge. This makes their "pound for pound" strength arguably unmatched.
### Comparison to Other Contenders
- **Popeye the Sailor**: Popeye’s spinach-fueled strength lets him lift ships or punch out whales, but he’s a grown man (likely 150–200 pounds), so his pound-for-pound ratio is less impressive than the Warners’ childlike frames.
- **Bugs Bunny**: Another toon force user, Bugs can match the Warners’ reality-bending antics (e.g., lifting heavy objects or outsmarting physics). However, his feats are often more about cunning than raw strength, giving the Warners an edge in pure power displays.
- **Mighty Mouse**: A tiny superhero mouse, Mighty Mouse lifts buildings and fights giants, making him a strong contender. However, his feats are more grounded in superhero tropes, while the Warners’ unpredictable toon force gives them broader, less-defined limits.
- **Hercules (Disney)**: As a demigod, Hercules performs massive feats (e.g., lifting boulders or Titans), but his muscular build and larger size (likely 200+ pounds) lower his pound-for-pound ratio compared to the pint-sized Warners.
### Why They Win
The Warners’ combination of tiny size, reality-warping toon force, and consistent displays of overpowering larger objects or characters makes them exceptional. Their strength isn’t bound by physical or narrative constraints, unlike most other characters. For every pound of their small bodies, they output disproportionate, often incalculable power.
If you had a specific cartoon universe or character in mind, I could compare them directly or dig deeper into their feats!
Posted on 6/28/25 at 2:01 am to Breesus
Buggs Bunny. He never got killed while all of his nemeses’ plans were foiled. He could sing, dance, burrow, fly to outer space, conduct orchestra, and even once beat “the man” and made them build a freeway around his concreted rabbit hole. There’s no cartoon character he couldn’t outwit, outfox, or outplay.
Close second: Snoopy.
Close second: Snoopy.
This post was edited on 6/28/25 at 2:04 am
Posted on 6/28/25 at 2:06 am to Breesus
Atom Ant
Because he was an ant.
Because he was an ant.
This post was edited on 6/28/25 at 2:08 am
Posted on 6/28/25 at 2:14 am to Breesus
Mighty Mouse is the correct answer
But I'll also add Bamm Bamm Rubble
But I'll also add Bamm Bamm Rubble
Posted on 6/28/25 at 2:25 am to auggie
quote:
Atom Ant
Because he was an ant.

Posted on 6/28/25 at 4:16 am to Honkus
So fricking lazy to use a computer program to answer what should just be a fun back and forth between PEOPLE.
This post was edited on 6/28/25 at 4:19 am
Posted on 6/28/25 at 4:48 am to Breesus
Sandy is pretty strong for a squirrel

Posted on 6/28/25 at 4:49 am to Breesus
Pink Panther. Didn't even need to say a word. Just got shite done.
This post was edited on 6/28/25 at 4:51 am
Posted on 6/28/25 at 4:51 am to Pelican fan99
quote:So close: right series, wrong character.
Sandy is pretty strong for a squirrel

Posted on 6/28/25 at 4:51 am to Breesus
Hong Kong Phooey…
He was a dog, who was Asian and had a black accent.
Pretty strong characteristics to me….
He was a dog, who was Asian and had a black accent.
Pretty strong characteristics to me….
Posted on 6/28/25 at 5:00 am to soccerfüt
Dang I forgot plankton was jacked as well
Popular
Back to top


31












