Started By
Message

Dodgers plan to pursue Kyle Tucker in free agency

Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99850 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 12:55 pm







Tucker is predicted to draw somewhere from $350-$500 million in free agency.


An ugly lockout is coming. MLB has got to figure out some balance between haves and have nots. We're about to have MLBs worst teams ever in back to back seasons with the White Sox and Rockies, meanwhile the Dodgers are purchasing a hall of fame roster with deferrals into the next century. Salary cap and salary floor needs to happen.
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
23981 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Salary cap and salary floor needs to happen.


So reward shitty players with minimum good paying contracts just cuz?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
68980 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

So reward shitty players with minimum good paying contracts just cuz?

There's a floor in the NFL. It's to prevent shitty teams from selling off all their good players to teams with a bigger payroll. There's already a league minimum salary in baseball.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
213856 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:06 pm to
Agreed…,Greed is killing a once great sport. The contracts go up and the overall quality goes down.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
213856 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:08 pm to
Just wait for Skenes to become available…Some team will pay $1 billion for him to throw a baseball…
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11289 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Just wait for Skenes to become available…Some team will pay $1 billion for him to throw a baseball…


Angels or Giants hopefully
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
34743 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:30 pm to
Tucker is already being exceeded in WAR by Isaac Paredes who was but one of the components of that trade

Paredes WAR 1.7

Tucker WAR 1.5


Whoever pays that much for Tucker is going to regret it.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125894 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:35 pm to
Tucker is great until he gets hurt and/or the postseason starts
Posted by Dale Murphy
God's Country
Member since Feb 2005
24827 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

An ugly lockout is coming


I agree. And while everyone wishes their team spent like the Dodgers, their obnoxious spending will be what kills baseball for a while. Another reason they are public enemy #1.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
34743 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:42 pm to
His postseason OPS is .680 and is minimum .100 under the other guys from the astros post season runs-Alvarez, Bregman, altuve, springer, Correa.


It’s why I say he’s perfect for the cubs a franchise with no post season expectations and is best known for being the “lovable losers”
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
16392 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Just wait for Skenes to become available…Some team will pay $1 billion for him to throw a baseball…



Hope he stays in the NLC so the cardinals can continue with the automatic win against skenes
This post was edited on 5/12/25 at 4:46 pm
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27837 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Another reason they are public enemy #1.


Along with this guy



Stan Kasten: CEO/part owner of the Dodgers and one of the biggest pricks you'll ever meet.
Posted by cubbynole
Member since Mar 2024
94 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:19 pm to
the LF well at Wrigley really impacted Paredes in his time with the Cubs. So many warning track flyouts with that 355 LF line, makes since he would see improved numbers with the Crawford boxes in his home stadium.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
148135 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

their obnoxious spending will be what kills baseball for a while
yes, THATS what kills it
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
23577 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

makes since he would see improved numbers with the Crawford boxes in his home stadium.


He's got 4 HRs

A pull hitter, it would stand to reason that he may gain an advantage there, but what has played out is that he gives you a QAB. Walks as much as he Ks.

Can get behind 0-2 and work 3-2 with the best of them. That kind of patience plays out in the long run much better than power when it comes to production.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15216 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

the LF well at Wrigley really impacted Paredes in his time with the Cubs. So many warning track flyouts with that 355 LF line, makes since he would see improved numbers with the Crawford boxes in his home stadium


He’s got 4 HR lol
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99850 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

I agree. And while everyone wishes their team spent like the Dodgers, their obnoxious spending will be what kills baseball for a while. Another reason they are public enemy #1



I dont like what the Dodgers are doing. Signing the top free agents of every glass but I don't necessarily begrudge them for doing it. But this system that has no guardrails for payroll where the biggest market team can just stack the roster with the best talent or conversely, smaller markets tank for years and still make the owner a profit. Its a shite product for the league. Somethings wrong if we're having back to back years of the worst baseball team's to play the game.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15216 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Tucker is already being exceeded in WAR by Isaac Paredes who was but one of the components of that trade Paredes WAR 1.7 Tucker WAR 1.5 Whoever pays that much for Tucker is going to regret it.


Yeah I’ll take Tucker. Idk how that WAR added up but that’s fricky lol

This post was edited on 5/12/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted by KTrain915
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Feb 2010
840 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 3:34 pm to
This right here is why I guess I'll never understand WAR. All of these stats either favor Tucker by a bit or are basically even and somehow WAR doesn't which I thought was a combo of those stats... Is it just because Third is a more valuable defensive position?
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15216 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 3:37 pm to
Yeah, somehow Tucker is a -.4 dWar
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram