- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judge orders Trump Administration to (spins the wheel) "Release arrested Columbia student"
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:56 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:56 am
ABC News
quote:
A judge has ordered that Mohsen Mahdawi, the Columbia University student who was arrested two weeks ago by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents following his citizenship interview, be released from detention while his case proceeds.
"The two weeks of detention so far demonstrate great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime," U.S. District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said at a hearing Wednesday. "Mr. Mahdawi, I will order you released."
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:57 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
"The two weeks of detention so far demonstrate great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime," U.S. District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said at a hearing Wednesday.
now do J6ers
Posted on 4/30/25 at 9:57 am to HubbaBubba
Good why should someone charged with no crime sit in jail?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:02 am to HubbaBubba
How about no we dont release Bunks cousin
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:02 am to HubbaBubba
can someone explain the whole judge thing? I don't understand how these cases even get to them? can they unilaterally change rulings regarding any federal issue in any district or jurisdiction? are they just watching the interwebz for stories that they can improperly insert themselves into? is that how they get these cases?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:03 am to tgerb8
quote:
are they just watching the interwebz for stories that they can improperly insert themselves into? is that how they get these cases?
Certainly seems like it.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:04 am to tgerb8
quote:dems have no power right now in government so they have weaponized the entire legal system and go after every single thing trump does w/ some kind of trumped up crisis to get emergency stays for everything from cutting fraudulent payments to ordering the return of terrorists from foreign countries.
can someone explain the whole judge thing? I don't understand how these cases even get to them?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:06 am to HubbaBubba
Where was this judge when Jan 6ers were held in prison WITHOUT charges?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:08 am to Jack Carter
quote:
Where was this judge when Jan 6ers were held in prison WITHOUT charges?
That's (D)ifferent. Just ask oklahogjr. He'll explain it, I'm sure.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 10:09 am
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:10 am to Jack Carter
quote:Likely counting their Soros money.
Where was this judge when Jan 6ers were held in prison WITHOUT charges?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:20 am to CAD703X
quote:
dems have no power right now in government so they have weaponized the entire legal system and go after every single thing trump does w/ some kind of trumped up crisis to get emergency stays for everything from cutting fraudulent payments to ordering the return of terrorists from foreign countries.
Huh? The history of litigating our government and hanging up everything the government does in court goes back a long ways. Are you familiar with naders raiders?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:21 am to HubbaBubba
Look, just say we lost him.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:25 am to HubbaBubba
It seems like one of these cases, at least, is going to address the limits - if any - of free speech that foreign nationals/green card holders have.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:35 am to oklahogjr
You need to rethink that statement
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:37 am to tgerb8
quote:
can someone explain the whole judge thing? I don't understand how these cases even get to them?
Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just answering the question.
These cases get to judges because someone files a habeas corpus petition in that judge's court. The petition alleges that their detention is unlawful.
The judges don't just invent cases. They only call balls and strikes on what is pitched to them. NOW, I am not saying they rule fairly. AND, at least in one case that was filed and ruled on after office hours, I think there might have been collusion between the plaintiff and the judge.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:39 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Good why should someone charged with no crime sit in jail?
quote:Did you say the same about J-6'ers?
oklahogjr
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:42 am to oklahogjr
quote:
The history of litigating our government and hanging up everything the government does in court goes back a long ways.
quote:
Trump’s second term, though only three months in, is already facing legal challenges (205–207 cases, 15 injunctions) at a rate surpassing Biden (133 cases, 14 injunctions), Obama (30–50 cases, 12 injunctions), and Bush (10–20 cases, 6 injunctions) over their full terms. His first term (266 cases, 64 injunctions) remains the high-water mark for legal opposition.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:42 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Good why should someone charged with no crime sit in jail?
That is the procedure when you are set to be deported.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 10:43 am to HubbaBubba
Put an ankle monitor on him
Popular
Back to top


12










