- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should the "con" - servative influencer soda whores ever be trusted or followed again?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:30 pm
The fact they were willing to sellout to freaking soft drink companies to cheerlead SNAP benefits means they should never be followed again. You can't trust anything from them.
No surprise to see the biggest political whore of them all, Jenna Ellis pushing tax payer funded diabetes with the rest of them.
No surprise to see the biggest political whore of them all, Jenna Ellis pushing tax payer funded diabetes with the rest of them.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:31 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Jenna Ellis
Shes like SFP of the poli. Imploded on Piers Morgan the other week over Orange bad
Big Soda just fricking lulz
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:31 pm to burger bearcat
This was not cool. I definitely don’t trust any of them.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:33 pm to burger bearcat
Doesn't change how i feel about tax $ going to welfare food purchases.
They want junk food, fine. Buy it on their own dime. Not SNAP cards.
They want junk food, fine. Buy it on their own dime. Not SNAP cards.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:34 pm to burger bearcat
Is there a list of all the people?
I know Eric was one of them.
And this has been a thing.
I know Eric was one of them.
And this has been a thing.
quote:
When San Francisco proposed a tax on sweetened beverages in 2012, ABC News reported that the industry paid protesters up to $13 per hour to attend anti-tax rallies. These demonstrations were designed to appear grassroots, with participants claiming the tax would disproportionately harm minority communities.
quote:
Similar tactics emerged in New York when then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed size restrictions on sugary drinks. The NAACP and Hispanic Federation opposed the regulation without disclosing financial connections to Coca-Cola. In their court filing against the Bloomberg rule, the NAACP argued the regulation "arbitrarily discriminates against citizens and small-business owners in African-American and Hispanic communities."
quote:
The industry has also influenced the debate by funding groups that might otherwise support restrictions. Save the Children, which previously endorsed taxes on sweetened beverages to fight childhood obesity, abandoned this position while pursuing significant grants from major soda producers, including a $5 million contribution from the PepsiCo Foundation.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:34 pm to burger bearcat
Everyone saw John Barron for what he is. This was just the icing on the cake.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:34 pm to burger bearcat
No. Especially for what amounts to about 30 pieces of silver. No way in hell a conservative can approve of SNAP benefits for sodas.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:34 pm to burger bearcat
I don't think it should be purely soda. Even juice has tons of added sugar and added calories for nothing.
Is soda good?No, but thinking that some of these "healthier" drinks are better is a fallacy.
Is soda good?No, but thinking that some of these "healthier" drinks are better is a fallacy.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:44 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Should the "con" - servative influencer soda whores ever be trusted or followed again?
"Again" would imply I ever trusted them to begin with, but the answer is no.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:44 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Everyone saw John Barron
Yeah. I posted I was against Junk food being purchased on EBT cards. Now go clean up some more shite off the floor like your wife makes you do you lying Libtard
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:53 pm to burger bearcat
You shouldn't "follow" any of them. Use them as a source? Maybe. But, most of these types that people "follow" are nothing more than aggregators of news outlets and actual journalists (many of which you all rail against constantly). Most have no real sources, rarely cite or credit where they get information, lack the means to do any real vetting of 90% of the information they share, and only exist because people choose to "follow" them instead of the other sources they constantly rip off.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:54 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You shouldn't "follow" any of them. Use them as a source? Maybe. But, most of these types that people "follow" are nothing more than aggregators of news outlets and actual journalists (many of which you all rail against constantly). Most have no real sources, rarely cite or credit where they get information, lack the means to do any real vetting of 90% of the information they share, and only exist because people choose to "follow" them instead of the other sources they constantly rip off.
100% this
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:54 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Should the "con" - servative influencer soda whores ever be trusted or followed again?
You shouldn't have trusted them in the first place.

Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:19 pm to burger bearcat
Who knew there were this many yankees on this board?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:14 pm to burger bearcat
Are there more than 4 “influencers”?
Clown World
Not Jerome Powell
Eric Daugherty
Ian Miles Chong

Clown World
Not Jerome Powell
Eric Daugherty
Ian Miles Chong
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:18 pm to John Barron
sure get paid on X under your real name deflect on here 

Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:21 pm to burger bearcat
Why would anyone trust them in the first place? They've always been grifters. They just made it easy enough for the blind to see with the soda pimping.
Popular
Back to top
