- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jim Jordan says Congress is preparing to pass legislation that will limit injunctions
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:43 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:43 am
20
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:45 am to John Barron
This is a good thing.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:45 am to John Barron
Hopefully this instills more of a sense of urgency for our Chief Justice to get his house in order.
I'm okay with this.
I'm okay with this.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:47 am to John Barron
When are they back from break?
Tell him not to go on Hannity and I may believe they will try to do their jobs for a change.
Tell him not to go on Hannity and I may believe they will try to do their jobs for a change.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 10:48 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:48 am to John Barron
Well do it already!
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:52 am to GumboPot
quote:
Hopefully this instills more of a sense of urgency for our Chief Justice to get his house in order.
I'm okay with this.
It will do the opposite.
He will take the position that the Legislative Branch is addressing the issue and the SCOTUS does not need to get involved.
In the meantime, Senate Dems will block it, so the orders will remain in place.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:53 am to John Barron
Oh no Tammi and Derek from Lake Charles!
Absolutely NO way your divorce documents are getting submitted this afternoon.
Absolutely NO way your divorce documents are getting submitted this afternoon.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:55 am to John Barron
quote:Several reasonable proposals have been floating around for decades.
Jim Jordan says Congress is preparing to pass legislation that will limit injunctions
It will be interesting to see whether this proposed legislation incorporates one or more of those or whether it will just be some silly red meat for the Populists.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:57 am to John Barron
Perhaps we can also get them write a tersely worded letter of complaint.
Those always work.
Those always work.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:57 am to John Barron
Sorry
Judge in San Francisco ruled that congress cant do that
Judge in San Francisco ruled that congress cant do that
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:58 am to John Barron
We don’t need new legislation.
Congress has the power to take away every thing except the salaries of these corrupt judges. So, use it and stop grand standing.
The standard isn’t “high crimes & misdemeanors,” it’s “good behavior.” Judges have historically been removed many times for far far less.
Congress has the power to take away every thing except the salaries of these corrupt judges. So, use it and stop grand standing.
The standard isn’t “high crimes & misdemeanors,” it’s “good behavior.” Judges have historically been removed many times for far far less.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:59 am to John Barron
Sounds good but it also seems like Jim Jordan is always the one talking a big game about what they’re about to do or are going to do.
shite or get off the pot, Jim. You’ve been hearings, task forcing, and committying us to death.
shite or get off the pot, Jim. You’ve been hearings, task forcing, and committying us to death.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:01 am to John Barron
Jim Jordan = Jason Chaffetz = Gowdy Doodie, but without a tie or jacket.
All hat and no cattle.
All hat and no cattle.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 11:05 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:03 am to Raz
quote:Which would be done through ... wait for it ... "legislation."
We don’t need new legislation. Congress has the power to take away every thing except the salaries of these corrupt judges
quote:Federal judges have been removed from office exactly fifteen (15) times in the entire history of the USA. There have been about 10,000 federal judges in that time frame.
Judges have historically been removed many times for far far less.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 11:18 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:10 am to Auburn1968
quote:
This is a good thing.
Won't happen, unfortunately.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:11 am to John Barron
Unfortunately, it will die in the Senate because of the filibuster. I don’t think there are 7 Dems that will vote for anything that would prevent judges from screwing up Trump.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:12 am to Reagan80
quote:
Unfortunately, it will die in the Senate because of the filibuster.
As it's planned to.
The GOP isn't giving up nationwide injunctions to use against the next DEM President
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:17 am to GumboPot
quote:
Hopefully this instills more of a sense of urgency for our Chief Justice to get his house in order.
I'm okay with this.
I really respect you Gumbo. I suspect you know something that I don't, so, please educate me.
The Chief Justice isn't "head of the judicial branch." It's certainly not "his house." Other than the appeals process (where he is just one of 9 justices with equal say), practically, how would CJ Roberts address the issue? [FWIW, I thought his comment re impeachment of judges was completely out of line.]
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The GOP isn't giving up nationwide injunctions to use against the next DEM President
Yes they would and it would be an easy decision on the cost/benefit. The DEMs invoked this 15 times in February 2025, which is 1 more than the Rs did in 4 years against Biden's lunatic positions.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 11:43 am to John Barron
Nothing...
Will
Happen
Will
Happen
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News