Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Greenpeace must pay over $660M in case over Dakota Access protest activities, jury finds

Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:53 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133476 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:53 pm
quote:

MANDAN, N.D. (AP) — Environmental group Greenpeace must pay more than $660 million in damages for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company in connection with protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline’s construction in North Dakota, a jury found Wednesday.

Dallas-based Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access had accused Netherlands-based Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA and funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc. of defamation, trespass, nuisance, civil conspiracy and other acts. Greenpeace USA was found liable for all counts, while the others were found liable for some. The damages owed will be spread out in different amounts over the three entities.

Greenpeace said earlier that a large award to the pipeline company would threaten to bankrupt the organization.


LINK

Great news.
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
30197 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:54 pm to
Pay up, Greenpeace.

FA

FO
Posted by DLauw
SWLA
Member since Sep 2011
6159 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Greenpeace said earlier that a large award to the pipeline company would threaten to bankrupt the organization.
yourtermsareacceptable.gif
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
14436 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:55 pm to
I’m a proud owner of ET. I’ll take that money.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86976 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:56 pm to
That’s a bigly award. That should cripple them pretty good.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
189403 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:58 pm to
Grosse Pointe Blank early on in the movie there's a scene where he's checkin his secretary played by his sistershe tells him there's an offer to blow up a Greenpeace boat it's in French

This was sometime after they had caught scuba divers with the French secret service or Navy trying to put a mine on a Greenpeace boat


laughed out loud in a theater ,, me and 1 other guy
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33523 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

$660M

Just as with all absurdly high jury awards, it’ll get knocked down on appeal and whoever sued them will be lucky to actually recover attorney fees. Like most civil judgments.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69312 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Greenpeace said earlier that a large award to the pipeline company would threaten to bankrupt the organization.


Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
1917 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:05 pm to
so after all the constant crying about biased judges, juries and lawfare...a north dakota court finds against greenpeace?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
13309 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

a large award to the pipeline company would threaten to bankrupt the organization.


We're all hoping it does.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
79748 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

In addition to advertising and protesting in favor of various environmental causes, Greenpeace has also been involved in trespassing, violence, and the destruction of property of those they consider to be harmful toward the environment



Terrorism
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
7547 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Greenpeace must pay over $660M in case over Dakota Access protest activities, jury finds


And from what I have read and heard, all of the Leftists camped out and virtue signaling while nearly everything they own is manufactured only due to these pipelines, was they left actual mountains of garbage and toxic debris behind not even caring about the environment.

They left their temporary environment in shambles compared to modern pipeline regulations for protecting the environment.
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
2544 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:37 pm to
Yeah not all judges and juries are rigged. But you knew that.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5459 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:45 pm to
Lawfare is a 2-way street.
Posted by TheBoo
South to Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
5139 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:52 pm to
Surely you can see the difference in the two matters and not conflate the two to propagate a narrative, right?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133476 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:59 pm to
Technically “lawfare” has a media component and is focused on process. The lawfare process produces media narratives for political outcomes. That’s lawfare.

This is regular old lawyering.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
5459 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:07 pm to
Good pernte. I still think this case has some lawfare flavoring. But you are correct that Greenpeace legitimately committed wrongful acts and was deserving of being sued on the merits.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
17016 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:27 am to
Local rail company is hauling the freight and they announce the pipeline will be built. Local rail company's value drops to nothing and Warren Buffett moves in and buys it for a song, given they will have no business, it is quite puzzling.

Suddenly Greenpeace and a few other NGOs show up, along with some indians and start protesting about the environment and how the pipeline is running across their main water source.

One, when they left they left the place literally filled with shat, literal human waste everywhere, so they didnt care about the environment.

Two, that precious water source......there were already two old rusty pipelines running across it.

Just a hit piece by some paid mercenary NGOs so Buffett could make some coin.

Always remember JP Morgans rule. There is the good reason.....save the environment, and the REAL reason.....Buffett making a payday.
Posted by da foozball
Member since Nov 2012
526 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:30 am to
Of course not. Their candidate lost.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
25066 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:22 am to
Good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram