- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Privatizing Amtrak
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:18 pm
LINK
Why haven't we had this caliber of conversation before now?
quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Billionaire Elon Musk, who is advising President Donald Trump on plans to radically shrink the U.S. government said Wednesday that the U.S. Postal Service and passenger railroad Amtrak should be privatized.
"I think logically we should privatize anything that can reasonably be privatized," Musk said at a Morgan Stanley conference. "I think we should privatize the Post Office and Amtrak for example... We should privatize everything we possibly can."
Why haven't we had this caliber of conversation before now?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:25 pm to Aubie Spr96
I'm ok with Amtrack but not so sure about the post office.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:27 pm to Aubie Spr96
When has privatization ever decreased costs?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:28 pm to Aubie Spr96
With the way the railways operate, and the track ownership, Amtrak would be effectively dead except for maybe the New York to DC corridor. Not saying that's bad it is just the realities of train travel in the US.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:29 pm to Aubie Spr96
I looked into taking amtrack and it’s ridiculously expensive and there aren’t many destinations worth visiting on the route.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:29 pm to Aubie Spr96
Not viable as a purely privatized company. There's a reason it's government run.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:30 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
When has privatization ever decreased costs?
Sometimes it does but mostly does not.
The question then should be, if it's not necessary, should it exist?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:31 pm to SpartanSoul
If train travel was clean, quick, not ridiculously expensive for what you get, and not full of hobos and weirdos, I'd travel that way all the time. We need an actual rail system like other countries.
Sign me up for this.
Sign me up for this.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:32 pm to bayoudude
quote:Same, thought it could be a neat way to travel
I looked into taking amtrack and it’s ridiculously expensive and there aren’t many destinations worth visiting on the route.
In addition to what you mentioned the site for trying to book travel sucks, no easy way to see routes timing etc
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:33 pm to theballguy
quote:
Not viable as a purely privatized company. There's a reason it's government run.
That's because the product fricking sucks. Make it high speed and efficient and people would bypass the airports every chance they could.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:36 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
When has privatization ever decreased costs?
What does that have to do with it?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:37 pm to notsince98
quote:
What does that have to do with it?
What is the purpose of privatization? How would that benefit our government or the American people?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:37 pm to chryso
quote:I am absolutely certain it needs to be privatized.
I'm ok with Amtrack but not so sure about the post office.
Junk mail is the customer, not you.
I would expect innovations (which originally were scoffed at) would take place.
Plus, I'm not against a good living but postal employees are paid far beyond their value, thanks to the union. It's been like this for 30-40 years now.
Think about the amount of changes from Amazon over the past 5 years. When UPS, FedEx and USPS started costing too much, Amazon built their own infrastructure for last mile distribution. Yes they farm this out to independents but my goodness, my home cameras catch them delivering packages at 3am.
I would imagine Bezos would be one of the bidders for the Post Office.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:37 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What is the purpose of privatization? How would that benefit our government or the American people?
Less government spending helps allow lower taxes.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:38 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
When has privatization ever decreased costs?
There is about 100 years of Econ research that finds govt run enterprises are costlier than private enterprise
Now, that isnt to argue that privatization is always the answer, but “decreasing costs” is not the reason for public ownership. Market failure is the reason for public enterprise
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:38 pm to Aubie Spr96
If you're going to rely on the free market and consumer demand to fund public rail transit in this country you won't have public rail transit in this country for long.
On a positive note, it should effectively kill this inexplicable love affair that some have in the potential of US commuter rails.
On a positive note, it should effectively kill this inexplicable love affair that some have in the potential of US commuter rails.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:39 pm to Jax Teller
quote:
If train travel was clean, quick, not ridiculously expensive for what you get, and not full of hobos and weirdos, I'd travel that way all the time. We need an actual rail system like other countries.
Sign me up for this.
I wish but it will never happen.
The freight companies own the tracks and prioritize freight and there is no way to economically build new ones so that will just never happen on a large scale in the US. Best case would be a short-range commuter line, that's why I said the New York DC corridor might be viable.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:40 pm to Aubie Spr96
Post office would be well profitable if republicans would stop intentionally sabotaging it.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:40 pm to theballguy
quote:
Not viable as a purely privatized company. There's a reason it's government run.
Only the government would pay $80 for hamburgers in the train lounge and sell them for $12.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 3:41 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
If you're going to rely on the free market and consumer demand to fund public rail transit in this country you won't have public rail transit in this country for long.
But that’s exactly how markets work. The consumer is king.
It’s a horrible misallocation of resources to publically fund an enterprise that consumers would not value on a free market.
Popular
Back to top


16









