Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2634
Registered on:8/16/2016
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:


Plans on entering


We don't really need to stand on semantics, do we?

Everyone (well almost everyone) knows that the portal is not officially open, but these announcements are the equivalent. They get the player's name out there so their agent can field the calls and have a deal worked out before the official date.

The "portal window" is a lie. Deals are being made all year long.
Well, I wouldn't pay Underwood money for Underwood :lol:

I can't see paying top dollar for a player that might not even be able to play but I'm sure the coaches will have more insight into his recovery.

Bit in any case the $ spent have to make sense. Just because LSU has money to spend doesn't mean that they can throw it around like a drunken sailor or the $ will dry up.

I trust CLK and company will make good choices.
quote:

Anyone that would pass on a Sam Leavitt type QB is retarded.


You can't say that in a vacuum. $$$ are involved and he definitely won't come cheap. It is up to CLK to determine if he is worth it.

Like all players he has strengths and weaknesses. If he values himself to high, you have to pass, he isn't a pay any price player.

Would you really pay Underwood money for him? Especially not knowing all of the options that will be available when the portal opens.

Maybe he is just unhappy there but I think attitude is crucial.

No matter who we end up picking up they need to have "The Want" to put in work in the VR room and with the receivers etc. over the summer. There are tons of QBs that have the physical attributes that CLK could do well with at LSU. We need one with the work ethic that Joe and Jayden had so they can take that next step.
Don't care. Go if he doesn't want to be here. CLK will find someone no problem.

That being said the OM insiders haven't exactly been doing too well with their thinking.
Oh, there are plenty on this board who fit that description as well.

The ones who love to go into every WBB thread and point out how it is horrible and they don't watch it etc. They can't stay away.
quote:

This is interesting. Kim’s never had her teams out of the locker room for the Anthem, wonder what changed.


From what I gather the sound system was acting up and delayed the playing of the Anthem and it had not been played/sung once the ladies came out of the locker room and they basically had a "frick it, we'll do it live" moment.

I don't think CKM's policy has changed, it just shows how people were blowing the whole situation out of proportion all along.
Chambliss is the obvious primary target. If he is eligible, he's on the team.

You still need a fully heathy backup though so CKL will find another option.

Leavitt would possibly be a 3rd choice with the expanded #s but he will want ridiculous $$$ so I'm not sure he is worth that.

That being said in CLK I trust and I'm sure he will be on top of this. He will also have better insight into where Lavitt is on his recovery and what could be expected of him in addition to his potential.

As bad as the QB situation is now, I'm confident next year will be much better no matter the name on the jersey.
She was asked about her thoughts on scoring 100 points in 3 periods and she said she is just coaching and she had the call reviewed even in a blowout because it was the wrong call.

Also said the players playing in the final minutes deserve to be coached just like the starters who get tons of minutes and wasn't happy they allowed so many points (62).

re: Does Alabama even make it?

Posted by SpartanSoul on 12/6/25 at 9:06 pm to
I think anyone who thinks they don't get in isn't counting Bama's mulligan. You have to subtract a loss.

I don't think they deserve it, but I think they will get in.

re: OL

Posted by SpartanSoul on 12/6/25 at 8:43 pm to
He is so bad it is really hard to gauge what the players are capable of. Even the known good players play like crap as a unit.

re: Zykyiya Johnson?

Posted by SpartanSoul on 12/6/25 at 4:58 pm to
She just got off to a bad start. CKM even said in the press conference that "We didn't get to see the real Z". She will continue to improve.
Why do people keep saying this?

Why would you be willing to "sacrifice" special teams? What qualifications does he have? He isn't a good RB coach, and I don't think he would be a good ST coach either. If he doesn't want to accept an off the field position he can move on. You can't let him hold the program hostage.
But how well would it go over to kill another sport just to bring on more players that probably won't ever see the field?

re: Baker Staying

Posted by SpartanSoul on 12/6/25 at 1:02 am to
quote:

"whole package".


I think you are referring to complementary football. :lol: :lol: :lol:
How can this be? I have it on good authority (all of the media and OM homers) that LSU and OM are the same. There must be a mistake. OM is going to need to speak to a manager about this.
Interesting article I ran across looking at the news. I never thought of the Tittle IX implications.

quote:

Going to 105 scholarships obviously increased the opportunity to give aid to current walk-ons. It also gives you an opportunity to sign more high school players for developmental purposes and overall gives you more numbers to work with. It also increases expenses and depending on where athletic departments are numbers wise it could me needing to add a non-revenue women’s sport for Title IX compliance would would obviously mean more expenses.

Some feel that, while more practice bodies are needed and the ability to take a “chance” on a guy who might develop into a player, more money should be allocated to those who play the bulk of the snaps in games.


https://www.on3.com/teams/tennessee-volunteers/news/report-sec-going-to-105-football-scholarships/
I agree about the good players that don't want to sit but I can envision a program like Texas overpaying for portal players just to deny them to an opponent. Some of them would trade some playing time for a big enough bag.

It won't be Bama of old stacking 4 & 5 stars, but they could definitely pull some important pieces away from teams.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Since every player gets a cut of revenue sharing, bringing on more people makes each get a smaller cut. So, bringing on another two or three star can take money from your four and five star players. NIL can make some of it up but is never unlimited.

They will have to think long and hard about balancing depth and project players with $$$. NIL will be even more important going forward.

I don't think we actually go all the way to 105 but we may have the money so who knows. Either way it will be nice to have some headroom.