- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The House should get impeachment ready against every judge issuing these immediate TRO
Posted on 2/10/25 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 6:53 pm
If I was running the HOR I would have articles of impeachment ready to be filed against every judge issuing these immediate TRO without notice or actual authority or the opportunity to be heard.
I would then have the entire house immediately vote and impeach.
The next judge might not be so quick to usurp the executive branch for the democrats
I would then have the entire house immediately vote and impeach.
The next judge might not be so quick to usurp the executive branch for the democrats
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 8:01 pm
7
Posted on 2/10/25 at 6:56 pm to dafif
Yes. These lib judges need some peachmint. The RINO's too
Posted on 2/10/25 at 6:57 pm to dafif
there's a better way to deal with communists, but if I posted it I'd get banned
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:01 pm to Don Quixote
Dims aren't going to vote to impeach so it would not result in anything. Maybe in the future after some dims are in jail it might work.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:07 pm to dafif
Let's hope they are getting ready to file on a few at once!!
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:11 pm to dafif
Remember when some of you argued impeachment required a criminal conviction beforehand?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:16 pm to boosiebadazz
I believe two thirds of the senate would have to vote in favor. I would investagate those crooked judges. I am sure with their lack of concern for the constitution that they have done other illegal things. Find it and nail them.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:30 pm to Don Quixote
quote:.
there's a better way to deal with communists, but if I posted it I'd get banned
Time to bring back drawn and quartered
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:59 pm to DefCon1
quote:
I believe two thirds of the senate would have to vote in favor.
To remove one from office, yes. But impeachment only requires a simple majority of the House.
Many forget impeachment and removal are two different things.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 7:59 pm to boosiebadazz
I will say it again, the Supreme Court has defined Presidential immunity and what Trump has done falls well within what the Supreme Court defined as his Constitutional duties and hence he is immune from criminal proceedings while fulfilling his Presidential duties.
So yes, POTUS and Elon must carry on.
So yes, POTUS and Elon must carry on.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:03 pm to 4x4tiger
quote:
Yes. These lib judges need some peachmint. The RINO's too
I know saying or writing that RINO shite sounds good but the most "controversial" nominees are being supported by 52 or 53 republicans. And the edge in the HOR is razor thin. Yeah, be done with that RINO shite talk. It doesn't exist to any large degree at all.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:08 pm to dafif
Republicans should sue in a friendly court and seek a nationwide TRO blocking disbursement of funds by federal departments that misappropriated funds. Like USAID.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:09 pm to dafif
Do things legally and there won't be a problem.
I'm startled that it seems like so many people are willing to break the law. Maybe I'm missing something.
I'm startled that it seems like so many people are willing to break the law. Maybe I'm missing something.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:11 pm to Don Quixote
quote:
there's a better way to deal with communists, but if I posted it I'd get banned
Is a helicopter involved?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:11 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Trump has immunity and he can give blanket immunity. Thanks Biden.
The judges are pissing in the wind.
The judges are pissing in the wind.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:12 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
I'm startled that it seems like so many people are willing to break the law. Maybe I'm missing something.
What laws have been broken?
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:16 pm to tgrgrd00
Perhaps none.
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:17 pm to dafif
Let’s get it done!
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:52 pm to Timeoday
quote:
I will say it again, the Supreme Court has defined Presidential immunity and what Trump has done falls well within what the Supreme Court defined as his Constitutional duties and hence he is immune from criminal proceedings while fulfilling his Presidential duties.
So yes, POTUS and Elon must carry on.
This non-sequitur has literally nothing to do with impeachment as defined in the Constitution and the English common law from which it was derived.
It’s somewhat alarming that you conflated the two so easily.
This post was edited on 2/10/25 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 2/10/25 at 8:59 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Remember when some of you argued impeachment required a criminal conviction beforehand?
Remember when Trump pardoning himself would be an admission of guilt?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News