- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why do so many people ignore major threats like climate change?
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:47 pm
Why do so many people ignore major threats like climate change?
Earlier last month, the European Union's Copernicus Climate Change Service announced that Earth’s average temperature in 2024 had been on average 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. This was the major threshold established in the 2015 Paris climate accord as a dangerous milestone for our species, in which temperatures are so hot, that collapse of major ocean and atmospheric systems and mass extinctions follow. Was this headline news? The biggest story of the year? The source of mass protests?
Quite to the contrary, it has already been swept under the rug in the public’s consciousness.
Yet the EU’s announcement did not occur in a vacuum: Scientists have warned of rising temperatures for decades, and 2024 alone saw climate change-fueled natural disasters from unprecedented heat waves in the Southwest to powerful hurricanes in the Southeast. Yet despite these calamities, millions of people voted for a president whose policies experts warn will worsen climate change. It raises a provocative question: Why do people find it so difficult to psychologically grasp the reality of human-caused climate change?
According to Dr. Debra J. Davidson, a professor of environmental sociology at the University of Alberta, it has to do with a feeling of psychological distance from the problem.
“For too long now, scientific and media communications have presented the subject of climate change in ways that have failed to trigger an adequate threat warning among readers and viewers, and have also failed to motivate a sense of personal responsibility to respond,” Davidson explained. Instead climate change is frequently depicted in the abstract, as an extremely complicated scientific process, and this causes many readers to feel remote from the consequences.
LINK
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:51 pm to djmed
Imagine yourself spending the last few decades living in fear of climate change & getting absolutely nothing out of the deal. Climate is the same from the day you were born to the day you die.
The ROI on climate hysteria is the same as Hawk Tuah girl's crypto.
The ROI on climate hysteria is the same as Hawk Tuah girl's crypto.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:53 pm to AlterDWI
I can't take this seriously if they're not going after China and India...and they won't!
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:54 pm to djmed
quote:so, IF you believe their data (and there's some legit reasons not to) we reached the threshold of apocalypse and nothing happened.
Copernicus Climate Change Service announced that Earth’s average temperature in 2024 had been on average 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. This was the major threshold established in the 2015 Paris climate accord as a dangerous milestone for our species, in which temperatures are so hot, that collapse of major ocean and atmospheric systems and mass extinctions follow.
So are people REALLY ignoring a major threat?
Maybe it isn't a major threat after all; the consequences they STATED (not theorized) didn't happen. So not major?
Maybe they aren't ignoring it all. To ignore something it has to exist.
Maybe it's not man made at all, IF the data is now falsified, so none of what they want as far as reaction or measures matters at all?
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:56 pm to djmed
Global warming was first warned about in 1975. It's been 50 years and we are still waiting.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:57 pm to nes2010
quote:I thought we were facing snowball earth at that time? Then bam! It's going to warm up.
Global warming was first warned about in 1975. It's been 50 years and we are still waiting.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 1:59 pm to djmed
Imagine how far left the average Canadian university professor is. Now imagine they are a professor of “environmental sociology”.
They are out of touch elites who should be laughed at.
They are out of touch elites who should be laughed at.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:03 pm to I20goon
People are ignorant of facts, delusional 54 percent of Americans have an illiterate rate below a six grader .
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:14 pm to Mr Cell Phone
Maybe the fact that CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, the fact that its actually lower now than at anytime in history if you look long term, our temp cycles actually aren't out of the realm of normal if you look at Earths history. You know basic stuff like that.
Pollution is a huge problem, but instead we focus on CO2 and temp.
Pollution is a huge problem, but instead we focus on CO2 and temp.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:17 pm to djmed
quote:
experts warn will worsen climate change
quote:
experts warn
quote:
experts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:18 pm to djmed
quote:
Why do so many people ignore major threats like climate change?
Same reason so many people stop believing in Santa Claus when they are 6.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:19 pm to djmed
Because its bullshite.
If it were real (and not a money grab) they would be looking at the worst offenders. China, India and several African nations are the biggest offenders.
And most of the "alternative" methods have a lot of flaws, such as the EV batteries being made from some of the worst elements on the planet. Windmills inability to generate enough power to offset their manufacturing carbon footprint.
What the US needs to do is move more towards hybrids and nuclear power generation. Hybrids allow people to use "clean" energy for short trips around town, but still use ICE for longer trips.
Nuclear is the way to go for power generation. That and a huge increase in grid infrastructure are required to get away from fossil fuels.
If it were real (and not a money grab) they would be looking at the worst offenders. China, India and several African nations are the biggest offenders.
And most of the "alternative" methods have a lot of flaws, such as the EV batteries being made from some of the worst elements on the planet. Windmills inability to generate enough power to offset their manufacturing carbon footprint.
What the US needs to do is move more towards hybrids and nuclear power generation. Hybrids allow people to use "clean" energy for short trips around town, but still use ICE for longer trips.
Nuclear is the way to go for power generation. That and a huge increase in grid infrastructure are required to get away from fossil fuels.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:21 pm to vl100butch
quote:
I can't take this seriously if they're not going after China and India...and they won't!
I can't take this stuff seriously when these so called scientist ignore what they are taught as freshman in chemistry and physics.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:23 pm to djmed
Because we know it is BS. When the climate nuts start acting like they TRULY believe and stop jetting around the world and living in their huge mansions, and hold other countries besides the USA responsible. But guess what? The only answer the climate religion nuts have is to make US TAX PAYERS PAY MORE TAXES. That’s why we know it is a complete hoax “.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:52 pm to djmed
Climate is changing. It happens.
Come to the mid west. If you don't like it, wait 10 minutes and it will change again.
Come to the mid west. If you don't like it, wait 10 minutes and it will change again.
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:54 pm to vl100butch
quote:
I can't take this seriously if they're not going after China and India...and they won't!
I can hear Gretta in the background going How dare you??
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:55 pm to djmed
I remember when the 80s were supposed to be the new ice age. Seems like yesterday
Posted on 12/6/24 at 2:58 pm to djmed
Wealth redistribution scheme
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 12/6/24 at 3:18 pm to djmed
Notice that they changed the name from global warming to
But they're singing the same song with the same lyrics
quote:because of the coldest winter on record for the entire northern hemisphere.
climate change
But they're singing the same song with the same lyrics
quote:
Earth’s average temperature
Back to top

17







