- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Allan Lichtman says the electorate failed, NOT his "13 Keys"
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:15 am
I don't agree with Eric Daightery's headline here. Lichtman clearly blames the voters
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 10:17 am
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:16 am to SirWinston
What a fricking idiot
He didn’t analyze his own keys correctly
He didn’t analyze his own keys correctly
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:16 am to SirWinston
It failed because he is completely out of touch like most Progs.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:16 am to SirWinston
You’d figure with how much these idiots say misinformation they’d remove all the fiction books from their liberal libraries.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:17 am to SirWinston
lol this dude is such a fricking loser
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:17 am to SirWinston
It failed because he is suffering such an extreme case of TDS that he is unable to apply them honestly.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:17 am to SirWinston
quote:
Allan Lichtman
Licht my balls.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:18 am to Scruffy
Yah the irony is that his bullshite scam would still be in tact if not for his TDS-fueled dishonesty
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:18 am to SirWinston
Good grief, for a man who claims to be smart, this guy is stubborn and stupid. I really don't care that he's a liberal, but when he refuses to see that his interpretation of his impartial model was skewed by his own partisanship, that's a problem.
I really don't think his model failed, just his interpretation.
I really don't think his model failed, just his interpretation.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:19 am to SirWinston
Progressive arrogance example right there.
It’s not him, it’s literally everyone else, lol.
Smh.
It’s not him, it’s literally everyone else, lol.
Smh.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:20 am to SirWinston
His 13 keys were right!
He horribly misinterpreted them
ETA:
# Name Description[18]
1 Party mandate After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
2 No primary contest There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
3 Incumbent seeking re-election The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
4 No third party There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5 Strong short-term economy The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6 Strong long-term economy Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7 Major policy change The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8 No social unrest There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9 No scandal The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10 No foreign or military failure The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11 Major foreign or military success The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12 Charismatic incumbent The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13 Uncharismatic challenger The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.
His guide was that Dems had 2, 4-9, 11 and 13.
Most would say they obviously don’t have 5-7, 9, 11, or 13.
He horribly misinterpreted them
ETA:
# Name Description[18]
1 Party mandate After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
2 No primary contest There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
3 Incumbent seeking re-election The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
4 No third party There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5 Strong short-term economy The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6 Strong long-term economy Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7 Major policy change The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8 No social unrest There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9 No scandal The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10 No foreign or military failure The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11 Major foreign or military success The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12 Charismatic incumbent The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13 Uncharismatic challenger The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.
His guide was that Dems had 2, 4-9, 11 and 13.
Most would say they obviously don’t have 5-7, 9, 11, or 13.
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 11:00 am
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:20 am to SirWinston
I actually wonder if any of their talking heads just simply fessed up, "Hey I was completely wrong, it's my fault". Just wondering.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:21 am to SirWinston
Lolololololololol
That could be SFP’s dad.
That could be SFP’s dad.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:21 am to SirWinston
quote:
pragmatic" "We've seen the explosion of some trends [...] Disinformation, Elon Musk..."
He’s right, disinformation cost her the election.
“Suxkers and losers” hoax
“Trump is going to enact a national abortion ban”
“Trump held a Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden”
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 10:22 am
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:22 am to SirWinston
He applied his own keys incorrectly. He gave the advantage to Kamala on some of the keys when she did not have the advantage.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:22 am to thebigmuffaletta
They are definitely still in the denial phase.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:29 am to SirWinston
No model is going to be right 100% of the time and Trump is one of a kind.
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:33 am to SirWinston
Reason he says it failed:
1. Elon Musk spreading disinformation
2. Racism, misogyny and xenophobia
1. Elon Musk spreading disinformation
2. Racism, misogyny and xenophobia
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 10:35 am
Posted on 11/10/24 at 10:49 am to SirWinston
What an arrogant prick. “…my keys depend upon a rational electorate…”
Sorry, but I thought he was an “expert” in reading the electorate? And, thus, he failed miserably. However, as it turns out, we have all gotten dumber in the last 4 years. You know, when we were smart and voted for his preferred candidate.
he also does not realize that we notice the dead animal on his head
Sorry, but I thought he was an “expert” in reading the electorate? And, thus, he failed miserably. However, as it turns out, we have all gotten dumber in the last 4 years. You know, when we were smart and voted for his preferred candidate.
he also does not realize that we notice the dead animal on his head
Popular
Back to top


28









