Started By
Message

Theoretical Question: What % rate would your mortgage need to be to pay more aggressively

Posted on 10/31/24 at 3:19 pm
Posted by UncleLester
West of the Mississippi
Member since Aug 2008
8357 posts
Posted on 10/31/24 at 3:19 pm
Theoretically, you are maxing out 401k/IRA and have six months of savings for a rainy day.

In your current situation, what interest rate (% amount) would flip a switch to you to get you to pay off more aggressively (if no fees for early payments) instead of trying to outperform that rate in the market with investing extra cash flow each month?

I do not have one of those magical 2.25% rates from a few years back. So to me, I am (at the moment) sending my extra cash flow each paycheck to pay down a mortgage above 6% more aggressively.

I feel to me it is the right move to spend my extra cash on now while my best friend told me that I should easily be able to outperform 6% in this market and I should just pay down the minimum note each month and invest the rest.

Curious to poll the rest of you since you all are money conscious. Thanks.

Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2121 posts
Posted on 10/31/24 at 3:20 pm to
Around 5%
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38701 posts
Posted on 10/31/24 at 3:29 pm to
It would have to be pretty damn high.


My portfolio is up like 32% this year. Would be pissed if I had put that towards my 6.125% mortgage instead.
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
18286 posts
Posted on 10/31/24 at 3:39 pm to
Yeh if rates were higher so would be my returns on savings and investments. That's a tough question to answer for me. Giving up money that can be earning is the kicker.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
34626 posts
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:03 pm to
Outside of investments and retirement accounts, I have cash in HYSA and laddered T-bills. If T-bill rates drop below my mortgage, I would consider recasting my mortgage. Right now, T-bill rates are about 130 bps above my mortgage rate.

That being said, I do round up my mortgage payment which adds a few hundred each month. I think it pays off my mortgage 8-9 years earlier if I did the match correctly…which isn’t a given.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
18546 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 4:19 am to
quote:

should easily be able to outperform 6% in this market


“Easily?”

6% is a decent return.

“The historical average yearly return of the S&P 500 is 9.352% over the last 150 years, as of the end of July 2024. This assumes dividends are reinvested. Adjusted for inflation, the 150-year average stock market return (including dividends) is 6.991%.”


Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6521 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 5:53 am to
I'm generally pretty decisive but when it comes to investing vs debt reduction, and taking gains, I struggle. Ultimately, my personal decision is to reduce non mortgage debt as a priority and put less towards investments until they're paid off. At least my simple brain logic is that your house is generally an appreciating asset and virtually all other debt items are generally depreciating assets. It doesn't change the taste of interest much, but there is a value growth of the asset that offsets and hopefully exceeds the interest payment.

How many years are remaining on your note and how long is the note?
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
19288 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 6:19 am to
Probably somewhere in the 10% range. If you’re starting with a mortgage there buying points to get the rate down may make sense.

My first mortgage was 17%, paid 4 points (then paying a point was 1% rate deduction) to get it to 13. Paid it off in 7 or 8 years as I recall. Aggressively paid over the payment every month.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
34420 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Probably somewhere in the 10% range.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
70841 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 7:39 am to
quote:

“The historical average yearly return of the S&P 500 is 9.352% over the last 150 years, as of the end of July 2024. This assumes dividends are reinvested. Adjusted for inflation, the 150-year average stock market return (including dividends) is 6.991%.”



The S&P 500 has only been around since the 1950s so not sure where "150 years" is coming from. The average return of it is also a little bit above that 9.35%. Around 10.6% through last month with DRIP.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14026 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

It would have to be pretty damn high. My portfolio is up like 32% this year. Would be pissed if I had put that towards my 6.125% mortgage instead.


How much would it have needed to be in 2022, then? I agree that I prefer to have money in investments, but not everyone wants that level of risk. It has been easy to make money since 2009 in the stock market thanks to massive government spending (and really going back to the early ‘90s). I do not see a reversion to the mean as I think the annual overall market averages are going to be much higher than 10% over the next 30 years (likely 15% or higher) because both parties are hemorrhaging money.

Any interest rate that is above what can be guaranteed return (bonds, savings accounts) then it is reasonable to pay down early. There are plenty of people whose peace of mind in owning a home is more valuable than investment returns. For those people, peace of mind is worth more than financial gains, so paying early is worth more than investment returns.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
92601 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Around 5%


Feels about the right line or at least by 6%.

At a certain point, having a "paid for" house is peace of mind money actually CAN buy.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
23330 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 8:44 am to
quote:


My portfolio is up like 32% this year. Would be pissed if I had put that towards my 6.125% mortgage instead.


Same. Totality of all accounts is sitting YoY at 30%. Stock only account which would be most impacted paying off mortgage is sitting at 37%.

Mortgage is the last debt I would focus on. If it is your only debt, you are not going be over 10% interest on mortgage, so invest.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2121 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 8:51 am to
If you can reliably do 30% yearly then none of this really matters. And you should be seeking/freeing up capital any way you can get it.
This post was edited on 11/1/24 at 9:03 am
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38701 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 9:16 am to
No one is reliably getting 30% yearly, but your wealth accumulation is going to be severely stunted if you're not invested in those 30% years.


Remember, it's much more important to be IN on the green days than it is to be OUT on the red days.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
2292 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 9:39 am to
Remember, it's much more important to be IN on the green days than it is to be OUT on the red days.
___________

This is so true!
Posted by LSUDbrous90
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2011
1539 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 9:46 am to
My mortgage is at 2.875% so doing the minimum there but my HELOC follows prime so that is sitting at 8.25% currently I think. I moved my wife and I's roth IRA contributions and anything else I could muster and put it towards our HELOC every month at least until it comes down to 6% ish.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
2292 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 10:20 am to
A number of factors to consider:

Would you really consistently invest the discretionary amount?
How long will you stay in the home?
What are your short term liquidity needs?
What is your risk tolerance? Asking this because a low mortgage or no mortgage is more important to some vs others.


In general, I would only consider paying mortgage down if rate is 8% or higher. I will add that I have not used a 30-year mortgage in years. I only buy what I can afford with a 15-year mortgage, so I am already on an accelerated schedule.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2121 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 11:06 am to
I agree with that, but isn’t that why the average annual gain is somewhere in the sub-8% realm? Without what you’re referring to, the average is probably 3-5%.

So if you can’t predict the 30% years, what’s the assumption? It’s gotta be sub-8%. If you can spot the 30% years…

Fwiw, I’m paying the min on my mortgage and don’t often agree with the early payoff strategy.
This post was edited on 11/1/24 at 11:12 am
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
37079 posts
Posted on 11/1/24 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Outside of investments and retirement accounts, I have cash in HYSA and laddered T-bills. If T-bill rates drop below my mortgage, I would consider recasting my mortgage. Right now, T-bill rates are about 130 bps above my mortgage rate.
This is the correct answer - it depends on the spread between the mortgage rate and the risk free rate. If my mortgage were 10% but the risk free rate were 12%, I wouldn't pay it off.

Of course I'm massively biased in the first place against retiring long-term, tax deductible, prepayment penalty and margin call free debt.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram