Started By
Message
locked post

Update on Olympic boxer - definitely not a "biological woman"

Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:09 am
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
2955 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:09 am
LINK

quote:

For example, Umar Kremlev, President of the IBA, elected not alleviate concerns with his comments, “We didn’t check what was between their legs,” he said, regarding the status of Khelif and fellow boxer Lin Yu-ting, per Crane. “They have men’s levels of testosterone. We don’t know if there were born like men or some changes intervened [sic] at a later stage.”


quote:

“Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting were among 4 boxers who underwent blood test carried out by a laboratory in Istanbul at a championship in May 2022 after questions from boxers, coaches and medics. Two boxers’ results were clear. Khelif and Yu-ting’s results were ‘inconsistent.’


quote:

A second blood test was carried out on Khelif and Yu-ting by another laboratory before another championship in March 2023. Based on the results of the second tests, Khelif and Yu-ting were told they were disqualified from the 2023 competition and had the chance to appeal.


Yu-ting did not appeal. Khelif appealed, an appeal Roberts said was part funded by the IBA. Khelif’s appeal was submitted to CAS (the Court of Arbitration for Sport) but was not taken further (by the athlete) and was dropped.

Chris Roberts, IBA Secretary General, said for privacy reasons he could not give details of the blood test results but people could ‘read between the lines.’ He said the IBA had been told by Algeria and Taiwan not to disclose any information on the two boxers.


quote:

Dr Ioannis Filippatos, president of the European Boxing Confederation and a medical doctor for 30 years, said the second blood test results from the laboratory showed they were ‘male…showed a male caryotype.’

Gabrielle Martelli, IBA World Coaches Chairman, said international coaches had raised concerns. He said it was not about discrimination but about the safety of boxers.



So, lets recap -

1. News article breaks about this - people are outraged.
2. Mostly liberals see this as a political attack on trans community - comes out and shames republicans and everyone who attacked based on the VAGUE response (This has become consistent as hell with the liberal media (trump staged his own assassination, biden is competent, trump didn't get shot by a bullet, etc etc). So, just like all of these other themes, the liberal media goes "here republicans go again, jumping to conclusions, they didn do their research, they are wrong they are idiots etc." Then they allow their audience to believe this is some normal chick that just looks masculine. Their reasoning was BS to begin with "meh russian collusion, they wont state the specifics (it was THEM who were using the lack of specifics to lie to the public).
3. Now, we get clarification, yet again, like in all these other instances that - no the "initial outlash" was correct. This girl doesn't belong here.

I see liberals on my facebook posting Idiocracy memes. They actually think its the conservatives that are stupid. Then i somehow ran across a profile of these LGBTQ and "trans" ones. Turns out - its a heterosexual male and a heterosexual female that are dating. They are identifying all this other stuff, and LGBTQ wearing rainbows etc, but at the end of the day, they are just two straight people that think they are gay? What the crap is going on?

/ end rant.
Posted by AUriptide
Member since Aug 2009
7459 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:16 am to
Did he win the Gold medal?
Posted by rnojoman
Harlan
Member since Nov 2023
139 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:24 am to
quote:

So, lets recap -

1. News article breaks about this - people are outraged.
2. Mostly liberals see this as a political attack on trans community - comes out and shames republicans and everyone who attacked based on the VAGUE response (This has become consistent as hell with the liberal media (trump staged his own assassination, biden is competent, trump didn't get shot by a bullet, etc etc). So, just like all of these other themes, the liberal media goes "here republicans go again, jumping to conclusions, they didn do their research, they are wrong they are idiots etc." Then they allow their audience to believe this is some normal chick that just looks masculine. Their reasoning was BS to begin with "meh russian collusion, they wont state the specifics (it was THEM who were using the lack of specifics to lie to the public).
3. Now, we get clarification, yet again, like in all these other instances that - no the "initial outlash" was correct. This girl doesn't belong here.

I see liberals on my facebook posting Idiocracy memes. They actually think its the conservatives that are stupid. Then i somehow ran across a profile of these LGBTQ and "trans" ones. Turns out - its a heterosexual male and a heterosexual female that are dating. They are identifying all this other stuff, and LGBTQ wearing rainbows etc, but at the end of the day, they are just two straight people that think they are gay? What the crap is going on?

/ end rant.


FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
32257 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:26 am to
Semifinals are tomorrow morning
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 11:27 am
Posted by kbtigers85
Member since Apr 2024
1461 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:27 am to
quote:

FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird

Here we go with the media programming “weird” bullshite. The entire democrat party is a freak show and you wanna call others weird. You people are straight up brainwashed
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62570 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:27 am to
quote:

FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird


Stop misgendering the boxer. He is a male.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37095 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:28 am to
Good lord this shouldn’t be this difficult and confusing

-not directed at you OP just overall in general. We make things so complicated
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46031 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:29 am to
JFC. Seeing something that is wrong, debating it, and demanding change from those in a position to fix things things is exactly what productive people in civil society are supposed to do.

Only a psychopath looks at the world through the lens of "everyone I disagree with is an obsessed unhinged cult nazi".

Posted by rnojoman
Harlan
Member since Nov 2023
139 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Only a psychopath looks at the world through the lens of "everyone I disagree with is an obsessed unhinged cult nazi".


Says the weirdo looking into the testosterone levels of a female boxer from Algeria
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46031 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:32 am to
good lord, we are fricked as a society.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34886 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Only a psychopath looks at the world through the lens of "everyone I disagree with is an obsessed unhinged cult nazi".


With your standard prog goon best you can hope for is one volley of debate before they resort to ad hom attacks.

I guess most schools quit teaching logical fallacies right before they dropped civics.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84420 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:34 am to
Neither of them pass the eye test. They have a distinctive male look about them.

The interesting part is that if they truly were born with female genitalia and still have female genitalia but blood markers and other biological characteristics more associated with males, we’re in a much more difficult place in trying to police this stuff.

This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 11:37 am
Posted by TigerPlate
North Dallas
Member since Dec 2023
498 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:35 am to
Politicians have immense difficulty in determining whether a person is male or female. My Dad a WWII Normandy Invasion survivor would not be able to believe that this question could even be asked let along not easily answered.

There are two different aspects to consider.
Phenotype and Genotype
Genetic -- DNA you are either 46XY or 46X Male or Female
Phenotype Secondary sex characteristics Testicles, Penis, Vagina Ovaries, Uterus. etc. Not exactly rocket science. Children are able to easily identify at an early age. It just seems adults are the ones who are challenged to distinguish.
Does not appear to be a challenge in the animal kingdom either.
Noah was able to figure it out when loading up the arc. God did not seem to have much difficulty creating Eve and somehow making her different from Adam.
Yes there are some genetic mix-ups where the Chromsomes get crossed and you have an aberration but that is exceedingly rare.
Of course, if you are an oyster then you are a protandric creature
Most oysters do not have a fixed sex that stays with them throughout the course of their life. Instead, they are protandric animals, meaning that they can change from male to female over the course of a lifetime.

wow probably too long. TLDL got on a rant.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
7858 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:41 am to
You find this odd or in your brainwashed terms “weird”.

Should athletes dope? PEDs?
Should it be tested? No?

“Weird” to test for cheating?

Once again it’s “weird” to rely on science and “normal” to be a political zombie in the leftist perspective.

Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
2955 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Politicians have immense difficulty in determining whether a person is male or female.


I think I can speak for most grounded people when I say - we don't give a crap about someone's gender, unless it has to do with something that requires things be categorized by gender.

In the context of sports - this is pretty clear cut. There are standards with regard to testosterone levels and chromosomes that are there for player safety. These standards were not upheld in this situation. That is the explicit, scientific backing of this. Allowing this girl to participate was one of emotion, not logic. That's a fact, Jack.

When looking at the interactions and exchanges that occured between the IBA and the Olympic committee, this was categorized as an issue of trans rights ironically, as they also get into over the opening ceremony. So, essentially, this was virtue signaling by the Olympic comittee, done on purpose to stir all of this up -- with the intent of coming out on top. So, they already knew the news was going to come out, and had their counter points ready to go the next day. Now, they want to shift focus to something else before the IBA and other organizations, like the European Boxing Organization - which isn't a bunch of Russians - jumped in and called them out for what they are doing here.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 11:46 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109606 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:43 am to
quote:

FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think

maga people are weird


Last time I saw this many people knighting so hard for a dude that likes to beat on women, I was passing through the hood during the OJ trial.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:43 am to
quote:

your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird


Your inability to determine a difference between a biological male and a biological female is comical at best and borders on mental illness...
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116690 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:44 am to
A woman can have high testosterone. A woman can be void of boobs.
BUT
A woman cannot have XY chromosomes. The boxer had them. He's a guy.
The IOC does not check for chromosomes for some odd reason.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
45739 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:47 am to
quote:

FYI, your unhinged obsession with this woman's genitalia is just another prime example of why normal Americans think maga people are weird
The question is whether or not biological males should be competing against biological females in sporting events, especially contact sports like boxing. There is an ethical component to this discussion that is important to understand. Dismissing discussion as some sort of "obsession" is not helpful.
Posted by rnojoman
Harlan
Member since Nov 2023
139 posts
Posted on 8/5/24 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Your inability to determine a difference between a biological male and a biological female is comical at best and borders on mental illness...


So even though this woman was born with female genitalia, they are biologically a male? Does that mean a woman born with male genitalia is biologically a woman if she has slightly higher estrogen levels? lmao you idiots literally cannot put together a single logical argument.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram