Another Crazy Conspiracy Theory I believe.

It's absolutely true. I have a friend who brought me a chaff disgronificator and the reading showed an aluminum parts per million that astounded me.To imagine all that aluminum suspended there in the air is really scary. It causes impotence too and mimics soy poisoning in males under 30. I'd urge everybody to be the Repeli 4500YT disgronificator and start monitoring it before your children begin to grow gills..

Why isn't this posted @ the OT Lounge?

quote:

---

Someone please debunk this.

---

I'm not going to. I haven't even researched it, but conspiracy theorists are, I think, undefeated at this point. I'm going to say it's possible, if not likely.

quote:

---

The US military is releasing chaff above our heads ... tons and tons each year. This is resulting in aluminum particles being suspended into the air.

---

They don't need to do that.

They just put it in your deodorant.

quote:

---

I believe all sorts of nutty, crazy conspiracies.

---

The question is why this is so.*

Without re-hashing a previous thread in its entirety, I believe it's a difference in philosophy.

For example, I don't default to believing a conspiracy theory and have to have it debunked before I stop believing it. Belief is not my default setting.

I remain skeptical until/unless compelling evidence is offered. Especially if it defies common sense or seems unlikely to start with.

But that makes sense considering that my baseline philosophy isn't defined by being a perpetual victim of government elites. I don't need to believe in conspiracy theories for my operating system to work. Some of y'all (and "some" is being kind) absolutely do.

*Before someone says that the "why" is because "there have been so many conspiracy theories that have been proven true," I've had that discussion before. What ends up getting offered to support it includes examples that aren't conspiracy theories at all, it includes examples that have not been proven true by any reputable or official sources (the people mistake their own personal certainty for offers of objective compelling evidence...the moon landing being fake is a great example of this...and/or take the word of some anonymous blogger or YouTuber as proof), and it excludes all of the theories that they forget about that have come and gone without evidence.

What we end up with is 2-3 legitimate conspiracy theories that have been "proven" to be true out of maybe a couple of dozen. Which is about right in the context of American history.

Was going to debunk it but I forgot.

I've been a witness of this phenomena for decades as a radar monitor. The exercise the military is doing is to mask aerial exercises. To hide an aerial attack should we need to use this technology. It's not to poison the earth. Chaff deployments are almost always in the same locations, and the population below them are not reporting medical anomalies to my knowledge. There are also spikes of energy returns that are blamed for DEW or other weather modification attempts, but almost all of them can be explained by radar algorithm or clutter pattern filtration weaknesses. To summarize, the use of radar data to confirm nefarious activities in real time is not likely to be a sample we could use. If you assume that technology exists, you should also assume they have a way to mask the operation to where radar technology isn't smart enough to give us a preview.