- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Melanie Curtin is Now a Free Woman - Appeal Overturned
Posted on 4/23/24 at 7:35 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 4/23/24 at 7:35 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Plus, just replace her with a dreadlocked hood rat and ask how you would feel about her actions, or a trailer trash methhead with face tats. She's getting a pass in the court of public opinion for being a reasonably attractive blonde.
BS. She's getting a pass in the court of opinion because potentially exculpatory evidence was suppressed/withheld. It's kind of a big deal.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 7:55 pm to Shexter
Is that pic the preview of a bangbus interview?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:12 pm to sleepytime
quote:
She's getting a pass in the court of opinion because potentially exculpatory evidence was suppressed/withheld. It's kind of a big deal.
That's legit grounds for a do-over. But she still (allegedly) participated in a gang rape.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:17 pm to rmc
quote:
So if she posted a surety bond before and went through the trial and all of that, she now has to potentially put another up?
Generally speaking, a commercial surety is a one off. Think of it less like general insurance and more like insuring a single event. Once that event has occurred, your insurance is done, even if that event needs to be done over.
If she made a cash or property bond, she can just put it up again. If she went surety, then most likely, she would have to post it again.
This post was edited on 4/23/24 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:19 pm to OptionRight
quote:
Bruh, who even has carpet?
Not most, but some are resorting back to a little mat by the door.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:25 pm to Shexter
I read some of the case today and from what I understand, her and Perkins were having a sexual relationship since 2013. The video they found of Perkins and her doing sex acts to Perkins' wife when she appeared to be unconscious was in 2014.
So the reason she got off is because the video doesn't prove the wife was unconscious nor does it prove that she was acting not under the influence of any substance that might have been put in her drink or something?
So the reason she got off is because the video doesn't prove the wife was unconscious nor does it prove that she was acting not under the influence of any substance that might have been put in her drink or something?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:27 pm to OweO
Since no one else has said it...
I can fix her.
I can fix her.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:45 pm to Shexter
So what's the cliffs on the story?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:48 pm to Tasseo
Home girl was eating some pussy and then shite hit the fan for her
Posted on 4/23/24 at 8:53 pm to Ghost of Colby
This isn’t her. This was Perkins girl.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:10 pm to SuperOcean
quote:
Why do women take so many pictures in cars?
Why do grown men take selfies looking down at their phone?
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:35 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Plus, just replace her with a dreadlocked hood rat and ask how you would feel about her actions, or a trailer trash methhead with face tats.
Remind me what she did? I do not remember the tale.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 9:58 pm to Shexter
The appeal was not overturned. The Supreme Court denied writs which effectively maintained the court of appeal's decision, which reversed the trial court.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:01 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
A freak is still a freak at the end of the day
That is how I read this..... I just hope the Orange didn't make a New Black.
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:05 pm to Joshjrn
Judge is allowing her to move out of state. I'm thinking that's probably the end of it
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:06 pm to Tasseo
From another poster:
LINK
LINK
quote:
Joshjrn quote: Did the victim's credibility play any role? I thought the main evidence was a video of the incident (which speaks for itself). Just finished the opinion. The very short version is that the video cuts in during the act, so there's no evidence of whether she consented or didn't consent. She testified that she has no recollection of that night, so she can't testify to consent either way. However, she testified that, as a categorical, she would never consent to a threesome and allow it to be filmed. However, there was evidence that was kept out that she had previously engaged in filmed sex with multiple people, engaged in filmed sex with masks, and the later found affidavit outlines that she had had group sex with multiple other couples. While none of that contradicts the video itself, it does potentially undermine her testimony that, in spite of the fact that she can't say she didn't consent, she can say with certainty that she would never consent under those circumstances.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 4/23/24 at 10:47 pm to krewerider
quote:
Judge is allowing her to move out of state. I'm thinking that's probably the end of it
I know her. She’s originally from CA. I figure she’ll move back. Has 2 sons, one is in college, the other in HS. Both are good kids. They’ve been through a LOT - this, and their dad’s suicide. Prayers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News