- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GA Judge Mcafee in Rico case
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think the judge just jumps over the bench and arrests them himself, like Judge Dredd?
quote:
SlowFlowPro
1
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:47 pm to Godfather1
Pump the brakes, people. They perjury charge is coming.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think the judge just jumps over the bench and arrests them himself, like Judge Dredd?
No, but it would have been nice if he had the balls to care of the problem directly, instead of teeing it up for someone else to do.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:59 pm to LJBurton
quote:
but it would have been nice if he had the balls to care of the problem directly
That's what I was referencing. What do you think he could do?
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's what I was referencing. What do you think he could do?
He should have removed her from the case for making a mockery of his court.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think the judge just jumps over the bench and arrests them himself, like Judge Dre
I know that you know better than that
I'm sure you know that this judge has some extra judicial powers as it relates to truthful testimony by an officer of the court
In fact the proper procedure would be to call in both of them with everyone else present, put them under oath and question them about the cell phone data points
Ask Wade as an officer of the court he was at the residence of Willis at the time identified.
I don't think even he is stupid enough to deny it
Then put Willis back on and ask her to confirm
This judge wanted no part of his duties for the testimony that went on in his court
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:20 pm to dafif
quote:
In fact the proper procedure would be to call in both of them with everyone else present, put them under oath and question them about the cell phone data points
Were those even in evidence? I thought that motion was filed just prior to the final day.
I don't see how they would have been in evidence considering I don't think anyone testified about them, to even authenticate it.
This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What do you think he could do?
what would you do from the bench?
what would like him do?
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think the judge just jumps over the bench and arrests them himself, like Judge Dredd?
He can immediately refer her to the state Bar for lying under oath.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:27 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
what would you do from the bench?
There isn't much a judge can do while remaining impartial.
It becomes a credibility issue for the judge.
Any criminal or ethical investigation is for another body in another proceeding.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:29 pm to masoncj
A gutless coward. Hoping someone else takes the blame and he can go back to bbq at the country club.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:34 pm to masoncj
quote:
The right thing to do would’ve been for him to disqualify them immediately
He should have recused. He used to work for Fani.
It just has the appearance of giving her an out. And she took it. Nothing in the Trump case was improved by his ruling, for either side. All he did was kick the can down the road, and protect Fanis job.
For now
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:35 pm to Bamafig
quote:
go back to bbq at the country club.
That does sound nice.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:36 pm to masoncj
Let me get this straight-
Trump and the other defendant's lawyers made a motion to the court.
The judge grants the motion.
MAGA still mad and judge is cuck.
Am I following along so far?
Trump and the other defendant's lawyers made a motion to the court.
The judge grants the motion.
MAGA still mad and judge is cuck.
Am I following along so far?
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:36 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
He should have recused.
It would have turned out worse for the Trump team. He was probably as good as they were going to get.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:38 pm to TDTOM
quote:
He was probably as good as they were going to get.
In Fulton County, Trump was extremely lucky to get this judge. It could have been like the psycho judge in NYC and none of this Fani stuff ever sees the light of day.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
No but couldn’t he have seen that perjury charges be brought ? Forwarded on to State Bar Association?
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:07 pm to TDTOM
quote:
It would have turned out worse for the Trump team.
There is no way. Shes still on the case, despite being nailed for obvious lies. He only went to the extenet he did because of the increased attention from the legislature
The only difference with a 'worse judge' is that Wade would still be getting paid. That doesnt hurt Trump. It just increases his chance of winning on appeal, or access to the Supremes
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:07 pm to Bass Tiger
Didn't Trump lie under oath when he said he had $400 million in case? That's different though, right? The case isn't going away, so buckle up buttercups.
Posted on 3/20/24 at 2:28 pm to masoncj
quote:Here come da board. Here come da board.
Having Fani and Atlanta DA office removed will be decided outside of his authority.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News