- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump cannot line up full bond in New York fraud case, offers to post $100 million
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:36 pm to TBoy
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:36 pm to TBoy
quote:
IF Trump can't suspend the Judgment, it would not be a wrongful seizure
You are a fricking idiot.
He has an absolute right to appeal.
The bond is to suspend the enforcement of the judgment while appealed.
If she acts on the judgment while under appeal without bond, she absolutely subjects herself to claims for wrongful seizure if the judgment is reversed because it is not yet a final judgment. She would be acting on the judgment at her peril (and no immunity).
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:37 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Who was defrauded? The bank who received the loan paid back in full
I just read that they can’t actually seize any of Trumps stuff because he is mortgaged out his arse. The narrative that all these loans were paid back doesn’t seem to be true .
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:37 pm to DEG
quote:
The lesson here is that if you are going to commit fraud, don’t also be an absolute piece of shite human being.
So, if you defraud actual victims, but are otherwise a nice guy, that’s ok?
Some of you fricking people. I swear.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:41 pm to bayoudude
quote:
quote:
banks did not use his appraisals. They used their own. ALL banks do their own appraisals. How did Trump commit fraud.
And on top of that the loans were repaid in full.. so tell me what fraud was committed?
I guess you could say if anything, the banks were fraudulent so they could loan out more money than they should to earn a profit on something they otherwise couldn't have. If Trump committed fraud, then the banks involved are all complicit in the act as well. Why aren't they all on trial?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:43 pm to udtiger
quote:
The bond is to suspend the enforcement of the judgment while appealed.
If she acts on the judgment while under appeal without bond, she absolutely subjects herself to claims for wrongful seizure if the judgment is reversed because it is not yet a final judgment. She would be acting on the judgment at her peril (and no immunity).
Well, your opinion is 100% wrong, so at least there's that.
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:43 pm to DEG
quote:
My opinion doesn’t matter.
True.
But I do have a problem with DAs promising to get political enemies during elections.
That doesn't mesh with being apolitical at all.
I'm sure you are ok with it considering the target. It's expected.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:47 pm to DEG
Are you really this stupid or just trolling?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:48 pm to deeprig9
quote:
It's weird seeing Tboy's and SFP's concede the judgement is ridiculous.
I still don't understand the math for how they got the number they got. A Judgment has to reflect some sort of metric for how it is determined, otherwise it is just an arbitrary number. While I didn't follow the trial to the point of knowing exactly what was introduced, the reporting about the trial has not demonstrated a discernable method. That's problematic, even if there was intentional fraud.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:51 pm to Steadyhands
quote:
I guess you could say if anything, the banks were fraudulent so they could loan out more money than they should to earn a profit on something they otherwise couldn't have.
WTF?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:52 pm to DEG
quote:
He was convicted
Jesus. You can’t even get the most basic legal terms correct. Yet you have an opinion. Opining from a place of complete ignorance.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:53 pm to Motownsix
quote:
I just read that they can’t actually seize any of Trumps stuff because he is mortgaged out his arse. The narrative that all these loans were paid back doesn’t seem to be true .
Not true? what a shocker
Posted on 2/28/24 at 2:56 pm to The1TrueTiger
quote:
Not true? what a shocker
You shouldn’t believe everything you read on the internet. Executives from the bank testified that they received 100 percent of the principal and interest on the note. Are you shocked?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:00 pm to Motownsix
quote:What fraud?
committing fraud.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:02 pm to Warboo
quote:Absolutely, but they won't understand. If a libtard could think and reason, it wouldn't be a libtard in the first place.
The bold above describes your libtard arse.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:02 pm to DEG
Wouldn't it stand to reason that if one of the banks didn't get their money back, the last place they'd show up is as witnesses for the DEFENSE?
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:03 pm to Northwestern tiger
It would be hilarious to see the left’s heads explode if Putin loaned the whole amount to him.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:03 pm to John Coctostan
Clearly it depends on who is doing the taking and from whom.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:03 pm to roadGator
How does one commit fraud and not damage? Doesn’t make sense. It’s either financial physical or mental damage but something was damaged
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You shouldn’t believe everything you read on the internet. Executives from the bank testified that they received 100 percent of the principal and interest on the note. Are you shocked?
Wouldn't it be funny if Trump leveraged them again? I just heard on the radio the judge stayed the decision barring him from borrowing in NY.
I'm betting they get nothing from Trump.
Posted on 2/28/24 at 3:19 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:Or Musk.
if Putin loaned the whole amount to him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News