Started By
Message

re: Putin’s Invasion Had the Opposite Intended Effect - Russia Now Surrounded by NATO

Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Who said anything about "during their tenure with NATO"? When Germany needs resources, they have a tendency to go get them.


The question was about Putin's fake propaganda about NATO aggression.

That would require a member of NATO being aggressive.

Now that you have context, feel free to provide examples of NATO aggression.

As for Germany, they pretty much are the bull in the China shop for the EU. They get what they want because everyone in the EU allows them to get what they want. They need the stability of the German economy to backbone the EU.
It isn't much different for the treatment of the USA in the world.
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
616 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:21 pm to
This post was edited on 4/5/24 at 2:48 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262209 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Something doesn't add up.
right. With one breath they call Russia weak, then cry they're taking over the region

They just say whatever is convenient at the time.



Posted by B2BWWchamps
Jasper, FL
Member since Aug 2023
652 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

A Vote for Trump will stop this war.



exactly

there is only one man that putin fears and it isn't biden
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8333 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

As for Germany, they pretty much are the bull in the China shop for the EU. They get what they want because everyone in the EU allows them to get what they want. They need the stability of the German economy to backbone the EU.


Seems like it's not being talked about enough that the German manufacturing industry is struggling mightily currently and industrial output is falling. This doesn't bode well for the EU with Germany being a huge power, and pushes more leverage to Russia. Europe is in an energy predicament regardless of what Putin does the next few years.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45876 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

A Vote for Trump will stop this war.
If Biden gets this one last haul, there will be a "historic" peace deal done. He knows this is it. Nothing else will come after this next money grab, and they can't let Trump take credit for the peace deal.

Mark my words, "Biden stood strong and ended the war through strength!" That will be his rally cry. Trump will be mocked for doing nothing.
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
2487 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

This aggression was never actually about NATO.



Here is another worthless opinion from SFP

You have no idea if that is true or false. You should always start any post with "IMO". The rest of us will laugh hard and then state our opinion.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
13079 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Here is another worthless opinion from SFP You have no idea if that is true or false. You should always start any post with "IMO". The rest of us will laugh hard and then state our opinion.


“If you have a different opinion than me you’re just being emotional” ~ SFP
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124313 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

As in bilateral resolutions?
100%!
That was a proposal following 4 rounds of negotiations, first in Belarus, then in Turkey. Multiple parties report Kyiv and Moscow were very close to a deal. Lavrov says Russia had signed off on the agreement.

• Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated a peace deal was reached with Ukraine last April and all the points were initialled before the deal was abandoned under Western pressure. He said, "We were not only ready, we agreed to negotiate, we reached an agreement in April 2022. And after that, as I understand it, Zelenskiy was told: since they agreed so quickly, let's exhaust [Russia].”

• Putin also confirmed a deal was done in comments in June. Putin waved a ‘peace agreement’ before Russian TV cameras on June 17, 2023, which, he said, Ukraine had ‘trashed’. It was a “Treaty on permanent neutrality and security guarantees of Ukraine” with 18 articles and an appendix dealing with ‘armed forces and other things’ Putin said.

• Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also confirmed that the West had blocked a potential peace deal. Bennett, who was participating in the talks between Ukraine and Russia, said of the US and its European allies: “Basically, yes. They blocked it, and I thought they were wrong.”

• Fiona Hill confirmed the same. “Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.”

• German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder said the same thing. Schroeder said that negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow consisted of five main points:

1. Refusal of Ukraine's membership in NATO.

2. Abolition of Ukrainization laws prohibiting the Russian language in the public sphere. Ukraine was ready to discuss the return of the Russian language to Donbass.

3. Donbass remains part of Ukraine, but becomes an autonomy based on the model of South Tyrol in Italy (autonomy with special status).

4. Ukraine receives security guarantees from the UN Security Council and Germany (according to the “5+1” formula, which was supported, according to Schroeder, by Umerov)

5. Crimea, judging by Schroeder’s wording, remains with the Russian Federation: “Crimea for Russia is not just a piece of land, it is part of its history.” But the Ukrainians, he said, demanded negotiations on the status of the peninsula.

According to Schroeder, it was not possible to reach an agreement because “everything was decided in Washington.” He stated, "I think that the Americans did not want a compromise between Ukraine and Russia. The Americans think that the Russians can be contained.



Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124313 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

The question was about Putin's fake propaganda about NATO aggression.
Good Lord

You people are 'special.'
Are you honestly contending NATO is no threat to Russia? Would your opinion be the same if you were Russian?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124313 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

You have no idea if that is true or false.
Which, considering Russia's litany of clear, published opinions re: a NATO-Ukraine alliance, is quite sad. His statement is demonstrably false.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Are you honestly contending NATO is no threat to Russia?


It is a free country.
Site your evidence.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14175 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

The question was about Putin's fake propaganda about NATO aggression.

While I strongly denounce Putin's invasion of Ukraine, it's not an unreasonable argument that NATO was aggressive in slowly creeping east onto Russia's borders.

quote:

That would require a member of NATO being aggressive.


No NATO member has been aggressive yet, but I wouldn't put it past Germany to get aggressive over resources and for Finland to get aggressive in taking back what was once theirs if they perceived sufficient Russian weakness.

quote:

They get what they want because everyone in the EU allows them to get what they want.

They get what they want from the E.U. because they're the ones largely picking up the tab. I don't blame them for making demands.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162266 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Russia will remain a functioning intact country long after the USA has been destroyed from within.


Their population vacuum won't be filled as easily as you think
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

With one breath they call Russia weak, then cry they're taking over the region


Russia can be weaker than NATO or the US but stronger than Ukraine, or Georgia, or Crimea.

That is how bullies typically operate. They punch down in weight. Not up.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

While I strongly denounce Putin's invasion of Ukraine, it's not an unreasonable argument that NATO was aggressive in slowly creeping east onto Russia's borders


Lol

NATO didn't invade Russia.
You can just hit a full stop with your nonsense.
Every country has borders.
Acting like the existence of a border is a threat is funny.
quote:


No NATO member has been aggressive yet, but I wouldn't put it past Germany to get aggressive over resources and for Finland to get aggressive in taking back what was once theirs if they perceived sufficient Russian weakness.

So there is no evidence of territorial aggression. Just Putin talking points.
Got it
quote:


They get what they want from the E.U. because they're the ones largely picking up the tab. I don't blame them for making demands.

We are in agreement on this one.
Germany acting in favor of the German economy should be expected.
As is the USA acting in favor of the US economy.
The difference is that Russia is moving their borders. Not Poland. Not Finland. Not the US.
Acting in one's interest shouldn't involve troops on the ground.
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:46 pm to
Never thought I would see the day that so many fellow Reps would love and defend Russia and dictators.. Strange days indeed......
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14175 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

So there is no evidence of territorial aggression.

Bitch, we're talking about the Northern European Plain. The entire history of that area is aggression and conquest. The fact that it's been peaceful for the past 80 years is completely artificial and was created by Bretton Woods and NATO. Remove either of those two and Europe will devolve back to what it's always been....a war-torn shithole rivaling the Middle East.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
15856 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

that it's been peaceful for the past 80 years is completely artificial


So 80 years of "artificial peace" doesn't count?

Wtf

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124313 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It is a free country.
So is Cuba. There is a reason they don't have nukes.

quote:

Site your evidence.
It's been done numerous times here. First of all, perception is reality. Russia perceives a threat. There is basis for that belief.

NATO rejected Russia joining the alliance 2 decades ago. That established a NATO-Russian adversarial status for the Russians. In 2008 NATO stupidly pronounced the Ukraine and Georgia would become alliance members. Russia responded immediately and forcefully that those countries by 1991 agreements were to remain neutral. NATO alignment would breach those agreements and would result in war.

In the interim between 2008 and 2022, Russia reiterated its position over, and over, and over again. Putin highlighted the threat posed to Russia of NATO exercises in the Baltics. As he put it, flying nuclear bombers 12mi from the Russian border forces Russia to deploy defensively. NATO claims to be a defensive alliance, but as he puts it, nuclear bombers are not defensive weapons. Succumbing to the same threat on the Ukrainian and Georgian borders would constitute a real financial and defense problem for Russia.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram