- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So what stops conservative states from…
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sure, but a Harris County jury would smack a Trump-like figure if given the opportunity.
You're certainly right in this respect. I only took issue with you trying to assert that liberal areas were more desirable than conservative areas because of who was more likely to live where.
0
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And I'm explaining why this wouldn't work. The alleged tort has to occur within your venue. If the Defendant can show they were never in that venue, then it won't work. These lawsuits are working against people like Trump, Rudy, etc. b/c they are always present in these liberal areas.
No you’re giving a reasonable legal response. I’m not asking for that. Throw common sense out the window. This isn’t meant to be reasonable. You just have to have a judge and 12 peers with an agenda.
Doesn’t matter what she can prove or disprove.
Someone just got an 83 million dollar judgement for damages over defamation from an alleged crime.
What I’m saying is just start making shite up and stack the deck. Change the laws to where it’s not relevant if that person ever was in that venue or jurisdiction. Fight retarded fire with equally retarded fire.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:45 am to fjlee90
Here's what gets me so they value one of Trump's biggest assets at 18m yet they're gonna put him on the hook for 83m? Besides the corruption of the trial I just had that thought this morning.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:45 am to fjlee90
quote:
No you’re giving a reasonable legal response. I’m not asking for that. Throw common sense out the window. This isn’t meant to be reasonable. You just have to have a judge and 12 peers with an agenda.
Doesn’t matter what she can prove or disprove.
muh fight
You just waived the white flag on rationality and admitted you're just being emotional now.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:47 am to fjlee90
quote:
railroad Adam Schiff for 250 million
Fauchi & Brix before Schiff
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:48 am to dgnx6
quote:
dgnx6
Damn that’s a quality melt.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
muh fight You just waived the white flag on rationality and admitted you're just being emotional now.
For a lawyer, you’re fricking retarded. That was the exact point of this thread. New York just kangaroo courted like a mother fricker. No facts. Only feelings.
My proposition was real simple. Why not do the same shite. Change the law. Go after the other party over bullshite unreal charges.
I’m glad you developed the reading comprehension skills 3 pages in to figure it out.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:50 am to fjlee90
quote:
Adopting similar laws as NY and pulling the same kangaroo court bullshite against high profile democrat politicians?
The NY law already scooped up Cuomo and the NYC mayor as well as many other well known folks of various political stripes. But, to answer your question, nothing stops another state from passing a similar law.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:53 am to fjlee90
quote:
My proposition was real simple. Why not do the same shite. Change the law. Go after the other party over bullshite unreal charges.
I have explained why this would be difficult.
You rejected basic procedure when you said.
quote:
No you’re giving a reasonable legal response.
At this point, you're just having a melt or LARPing.
quote:
Change the law.
You're not going to be able to change venue laws.
quote:
Go after the other party over bullshite unreal charges.
You have to forum shop with a limited number of potential forums favorable to you.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have to forum shop with a limited number of potential forums favorable to you.
Sounds like a possibility.
quote:
I have explained why this would be difficult. You rejected basic procedure when you said.
Then change the procedure too.
quote:
You're not going to be able to change venue laws
New York created a law that allowed someone to be held civilly liable for a crime that was never proven, hell never litigated in court. It’s possible. Is it probable? Probably not. I’m talking lawfare here. Im not talking about doing the right thing.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:59 am to cwill
quote:
But, to answer your question, nothing stops another state from passing a similar law.
Well hopefully a soul and conscience.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The reason that this tactic can be used against people like Trump, Rudy, etc. is because liberal areas are more desirable for conservatives to be present at a high rate, than the reverse.
The reason this works is your Rando off the street conservative respects the rule of law and would be really hard to get a jury of conservatives to frick a liberal over just because they did the same to Trump.
Progressives have no morals and they will ignore the truth, facts and the law to screw trump over.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have to forum shop with a limited number of potential forums favorable to you.
Somebody pull up that red versus blue county map.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:01 am to thetempleowl
quote:
The reason this works is your Rando off the street conservative respects the rule of law and would be really hard to get a jury of conservatives to frick a liberal over just because they did the same to Trump.
I don't know about that, brother.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:03 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Somebody pull up that red versus blue county map.
You're not going to find many high profile liberal types outside of liberal areas.
Nancy Pelosi ain't going to Vernon Parish anytime soon.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
So much of this stuff ain’t hinging on physical presence/contacts, it seems.
I don’t think this is ‘the way’ though.
I don’t think this is ‘the way’ though.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:12 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So much of this stuff ain’t hinging on physical presence/contacts, it seems.
That's how Rudy was dragged into DC and why Trump's civil case was in NYC.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:30 am to fjlee90
I don’t think most conservatives on a jury would be willing to abuse the law in that way. Maybe I am delusional, but the average conservative doesn’t strike me as someone who would be willing to betray their ethics to engage in lawfare.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 10:11 am to fjlee90
Too principled for their own good. Too worried about optics to defeat their opponents.
Posted on 1/27/24 at 12:07 pm to tommy2tone1999
Optics don’t mean much when you’re dead
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News