- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Meanwhile back at the Media Matters lawsuit/filth pile; donors identified
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:00 am
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:00 am
Meanwhile back at the Media Matters lawsuit/filth pile; donors identified in their attack on free speech and AMERICANS
BREAKING:
@FreeBeacon
has uncovered a confidential list revealing Media Matters' major contributors.
Brace yourself for this shocking surprise — they're all Democratic megadonors.
• Deborah J. Simon: $4,000,000
• Gill Foundation: $2,970,000
• Josh and Anita Bekenstein: $1,750,000
• Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation: $1,900,000
• Susan T. Buffett Foundation: $1,751,199
Media Matters, the brainchild of Clinton loyalist David Brock, calls itself a media watchdog but operates as a DNC front group orchestrating advertiser boycotts and suppressing free speech on social media.
In a shocking federal lawsuit, a Media Matters employee obsessively refreshed a fringe video on
@rumblevideo
over 70 times until he found a Netflix ad that could be used as fodder for a public pressure campaign.
Despite being the sole viewer of that Netflix ad next to the fringe video, Media Matters falsely insinuated in an article that Netflix ads frequently accompanied fringe content on Rumble, coercing advertisers to abandon the platform.
On
@X
, Media Matters accessed accounts active for 30 days, bypassing ad filters for new users, and selectively followed accounts with fringe content and those owned by X's major corporate advertisers.
After repeatedly scrolling and refreshing their timeline - 13 more times than an average user - they generated screenshots of fringe content next to X's top advertisers.
Media Matters' defamation was so fabricated that IBM, Comcast, and Oracle had their ads appear next to fringe content for just one account—an employee of Media Matters—out of over 550 million active users on
@X
.
Media Matters conveniently left out these details in their reporting, sidestepping the fact that their reporters manipulated the platform to create fringe content next to major corporate advertisers.
Why are Democratic megadonors like
@GillFoundation
,
@Josh_Bekenstein
, and
@BuffettScholars
financially supporting these clearly deceptive, malicious tactics aimed at stifling free speech on the internet?
BREAKING:
@FreeBeacon
has uncovered a confidential list revealing Media Matters' major contributors.
Brace yourself for this shocking surprise — they're all Democratic megadonors.
• Deborah J. Simon: $4,000,000
• Gill Foundation: $2,970,000
• Josh and Anita Bekenstein: $1,750,000
• Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation: $1,900,000
• Susan T. Buffett Foundation: $1,751,199
Media Matters, the brainchild of Clinton loyalist David Brock, calls itself a media watchdog but operates as a DNC front group orchestrating advertiser boycotts and suppressing free speech on social media.
In a shocking federal lawsuit, a Media Matters employee obsessively refreshed a fringe video on
@rumblevideo
over 70 times until he found a Netflix ad that could be used as fodder for a public pressure campaign.
Despite being the sole viewer of that Netflix ad next to the fringe video, Media Matters falsely insinuated in an article that Netflix ads frequently accompanied fringe content on Rumble, coercing advertisers to abandon the platform.
On
@X
, Media Matters accessed accounts active for 30 days, bypassing ad filters for new users, and selectively followed accounts with fringe content and those owned by X's major corporate advertisers.
After repeatedly scrolling and refreshing their timeline - 13 more times than an average user - they generated screenshots of fringe content next to X's top advertisers.
Media Matters' defamation was so fabricated that IBM, Comcast, and Oracle had their ads appear next to fringe content for just one account—an employee of Media Matters—out of over 550 million active users on
@X
.
Media Matters conveniently left out these details in their reporting, sidestepping the fact that their reporters manipulated the platform to create fringe content next to major corporate advertisers.
Why are Democratic megadonors like
@GillFoundation
,
@Josh_Bekenstein
, and
@BuffettScholars
financially supporting these clearly deceptive, malicious tactics aimed at stifling free speech on the internet?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 11:42 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Thus is why the fed govt is attacking elon musk relentlessly
He is a major player to save the republic from the commies
He is a major player to save the republic from the commies
Posted on 1/8/24 at 12:24 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Elon saw that screen shot listing these donors and replied back:
"Interesting...will have to add them to the lawsuit!"
"Interesting...will have to add them to the lawsuit!"
Posted on 1/8/24 at 12:45 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
There seems to be one group of really rich people who hate freedom of speech in this country. They try to undermine it nonstop
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:22 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Democrats and establishment politicians are so fricking corrupt.
How can anyone side with them nowadays?
How can anyone side with them nowadays?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:31 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
3 of those names are Jewish. I can't figure what the Hell they're afraid of?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:32 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Democrats applaud this.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:42 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
The “About” section for Tim Gill, the head of the Gill Foundation, returns a 404 error.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:00 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
The OP is further proof we don't have a government of the people for the people, we have a US Corporatocracy for the benefit of the Corporate Globalists.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:59 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
The question that needs an answer is what are these big money "donors" getting in return for their money. I do not see media matters as a charity organization providing a social need, it's more of an aggregator and promoter of liberal news narratives.
I always figured they were the "subscription" service packaging stories to MSM for copy/paste print media and smile and read copy for radio/TV.
I always figured they were the "subscription" service packaging stories to MSM for copy/paste print media and smile and read copy for radio/TV.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:46 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
No shite, they’ve been running cover for the Uniparty on the internet for years now.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:54 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 10:58 am
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:08 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
Deborah J. Simon: $4,000,000
• Gill Foundation: $2,970,000
• Josh and Anita Bekenstein: $1,750,000
• Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation: $1,900,000
• Susan T. Buffett Foundation: $1,751,199
Posted on 1/8/24 at 9:00 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Lots of Steins. fricking Jews
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News