- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wednesday or other SCOTUS experts, is this a trap?
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:48 pm
Elections are state issues. If SCOTUS reverses this will it give precedent for elections to be federal?
Example: Down the road, fed gov wants to ban voter ID or make early voting and mail in voting nationwide. Will they vote this Trump v.Colorado case?
Example: Down the road, fed gov wants to ban voter ID or make early voting and mail in voting nationwide. Will they vote this Trump v.Colorado case?
27
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:49 pm to anc
State issue to vote not one to block voting rights
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:50 pm to anc
No. This is a separate issue.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:51 pm to anc
With this sort of nefarious, insane ruling from the Democrats, what's to stop States from putting some REALLY restrictive rights on candidates and who can actually vote?
Democrats are fking Nazis.
Democrats are fking Nazis.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:52 pm to anc
quote:
Elections are state issues
Yes, and no. This is not about the mechanisms of the voting process, but candidate qualifications.
In that regard, federal elections are federal.
Also, this was an application of Federal Law (Constitution [14th Amendment]).
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:54 pm to anc
I can certainly see them baiting republicans into removing Biden as retaliation and then going full lawfare against anyone who was involved, much like Jan 6. The media will forget who did it initially and republicans will be painted as anti-democracy.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 7:56 pm to anc
....
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:01 pm to anc
It just similar to 1960’s saying an African American or woman cannot run due to race or color of their skin.
If someone qualifies they should be able to run. This is a slippery slope.
If someone qualifies they should be able to run. This is a slippery slope.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:10 pm to anc
It’s more of a substantive due process issue than it is a state election issue.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:30 pm to anc
quote:
Elections are state issues. If SCOTUS reverses this will it give precedent for elections to be federal?
So you slept thru the 2000 election?
The Supremes took over the state of Flas procedure to select their own electors. The decision to overturn CO would be far less intrusive than 2000
This post was edited on 12/19/23 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 12/19/23 at 8:32 pm to anc
1. This is a trap but not the kind you’re thinking.
They want the right to react with violence/protests
2. If you read the ruling they will “stay the ruling until Jan 4th pending USSC rule.” They know exactly what the ruling would be and don’t care
All state ballot options must be In by The 5th.
They want an extreme reaction. That’s it
They want the right to react with violence/protests
2. If you read the ruling they will “stay the ruling until Jan 4th pending USSC rule.” They know exactly what the ruling would be and don’t care
All state ballot options must be In by The 5th.
They want an extreme reaction. That’s it
Posted on 12/19/23 at 9:02 pm to anc
USSC already ruled Cali can’t deny ballot by requesting tax returns…..
Posted on 12/19/23 at 9:45 pm to anc
quote:
Wednesday or other SCOTUS experts
I literally spit my beer out.
Posted on 12/19/23 at 10:15 pm to anc
State is trying to defy a Constitutional Amendment (14th) by misinterpreting it.
If a state is challenging an established CA, then the Constitution takes precedence, and the SCOTUS definitely has cause to rule on it.
If a state is challenging an established CA, then the Constitution takes precedence, and the SCOTUS definitely has cause to rule on it.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 4:20 am to anc
quote:
Wednesday
Posted on 12/20/23 at 4:49 am to anc
I can’t imagine the SCOTUS allowing the Colorado ruling to stand. As we all know, it is the business of courts to ensure free and fair elections. This ruling will be challenged and likely reversed.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 5:01 am to anc
I hope Clarence Thomas writes the opinion amd puts a picture of his nutsack where his signature belongs.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 5:14 am to anc
No, …. this is a sign of desperation. Can you smell the fear yet?
This will result in an emergency SC Ruling to stay the Colorado ruling. Likely in January.
Their need for control, to openly deny due process, is a response to fear.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 6:20 am to anc
quote:
Elections are state issues. If SCOTUS reverses this will it give precedent for elections to be federal?
No.
Posted on 12/20/23 at 6:32 am to anc
quote:
Elections are state issues. If SCOTUS reverses this will it give precedent for elections to be federal?
Qualifications for being able to run for President are a Constitutional (federal) issue. Shouldn't have the effects you're worried about.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News