Started By
Message

re: EvangelicalBible.com with a boom today

Posted on 12/12/23 at 5:48 pm to
Posted by jfran23
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
1339 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 5:48 pm to
Who gives you the right to say that? Please explain why I should blindly support Israel and Jews since I'm a Christian?
Posted by TNTigerman
James Island
Member since Sep 2012
10516 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:12 pm to
If you truly want to learn something, you will take the time to read the ariticle from a web site linked below. It's a very succinct ariticle on the Jews returning to the land promised to them by the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jaob - who are, by the way, the same people today as they were then. Most of the Diaspora Jews settled in the Arab countries, Eastern, Western, and Central Europe, Russia, and that's where most of them came back from.

Also, read further below and you will understand why God has brought them back into the land. Spoiler alert: It's not based on any modern day changes to the Jews' 3000 years of disobedience to God and His statutes.

The Restoration of Israel

God said he would bring them back in "unbelief" as clearly stated in the article multiple times and below:

The Process of Restoration
All the prophets agree that Israel’s last-days restoration would involve a two-phase process. First, there would be a physical return to the Land and then a spiritual return to God. That is, Israel would return to the Land in unbelief for the purpose of coming to belief.

Both Zechariah 1:3 and Malachi 3:7 express this two-step process in very simple terms: “Return to Me and I will return to you.”

Hosea 6:1-3 also speaks of Israel’s return or tshuva (repentance), leading to God’s return to them.

Jeremiah 24:6-7 states: “I will bring them back to this land… Then I will give them a heart to know Me, that I am the Lord; and they shall be My people, and I will be their God, for they shall return to Me with their whole heart.”

In Jeremiah 32 the Lord promises: “Behold, I will gather them out of all countries where I have driven them in My anger, in My fury, and in great wrath; I will bring them back to this place, and I will cause them to dwell safely. They shall be My people, and I will be their God; then I will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear Me forever… And I will make an everlasting covenant with them… and I will assuredly plant them in this land, with all My heart, and with all My soul.” (Jeremiah 32:37-42)

And in the clearest picture of this two-phase process of restoration, Ezekiel 36 declares: “For I will take you from among the nations, gather you out of all countries, and bring you into your own land. Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you… I will deliver you from all your uncleannesses. I will call for the grain and multiply it, and bring no famine upon you. And I will multiply the fruit of your trees and the increase of your fields, so that you need never again bear the reproach of famine among the nations.” (Ezekiel 36:24-30)

God has not yet "sprinkled clean water" on them. It will be in His time. And it will be for the sake of His Holy Name:

17 Son of man, when the house of Israel dwelt in their own land, they defiled it by their own way and by their doings: their way was before me as the uncleanness of a removed woman.

18 Wherefore I poured my fury upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for their idols wherewith they had polluted it:

19 And I scattered them among the heathen, and they were dispersed through the countries: according to their way and according to their doings I judged them.

20 And when they entered unto the heathen, whither they went, they profaned my holy name, when they said to them, These are the people of the Lord, and are gone forth out of his land.

21 But I had pity for mine holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the heathen, whither they went.

22 Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went.

23 And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord, saith the Lord God, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes.

24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.

25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.

26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.

27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.

28 And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.

29 I will also save you from all your uncleannesses: and I will call for the corn, and will increase it, and lay no famine upon you.

30 And I will multiply the fruit of the tree, and the increase of the field, that ye shall receive no more reproach of famine among the heathen.

31 Then shall ye remember your own evil ways, and your doings that were not good, and shall lothe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and for your abominations.

32 Not for your sakes do I this, saith the Lord God, be it known unto you: be ashamed and confounded for your own ways, O house of Israel.

33 Thus saith the Lord God; In the day that I shall have cleansed you from all your iniquities I will also cause you to dwell in the cities, and the wastes shall be builded.

34 And the desolate land shall be tilled, whereas it lay desolate in the sight of all that passed by.

And for you who still claim that the Jews of the first century were Christ killers: God sent His Son to die for our sins. Jesus was simply following God the Father's wishes. If that weren't the plan, do you think God would have let that happen to His Son? Further, it was prophesied multiple times in the Old Testament that the Messiah would die on a cross for our sins.

Finally, Genesis 12:3:
"And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”




Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59055 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

TNTigerman


Oh good lord. Your religious beliefs would have been anathema to Christians for the vast majority of the past 2000 years.
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
2834 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:40 pm to
Thanks for the response I’ll check it out!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111597 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:42 pm to
Genesis 12:3 is referencing Jesus. Not Israel. Just to be clear.

I’m also not interested in your heretical dispensationalism.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
1839 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Of course the religion that grew up around him is an entirely different matter and has more to do with Paul than with Jesus.


Yes, Paul is the only reason Christianity exists.

In Paul’s letters, he references a celestial Jesus being killed by archons (demons, what your Bible will translate as rulers, powers, and principalities) in the lowest heaven under the firmament. Paul makes no mention of an earthly Jesus. He makes no mention of anyone ever meeting an earthly Jesus. In fact, Paul states that just like the other apostles, namely Peter and James but others too, he knows of Jesus and the gospel by finding hidden meaning in the Jewish scriptures and by direct revelation (hallucinations, visions) of the Lord himself.

Paul argues amongst his congregations and the other apostles. Wouldn’t it have been something for Paul to say “yeah but Jesus told me this directly himself when he was in Galilee” or something to that extent. Paul never gets “one-up’d” by the other apostles, because like Paul, the others had also never met an earthly Jesus and they didn’t claim for him to have ever been on earth in a fleshly body.

Mark created a narrative very much like a play. The end has the two women running away from the tomb in fear after the man/angel told them Jesus had been resurrected. It literally says they ran away in fear and told no one. I think Mark may have been some type of play or literature meant for entertainment value only, but possibly as a tool to convert gentiles who weren’t familiar with Jewish theology of the celestial Jesus.

In Mark, the disciples are dummies. They don’t understand what Jesus is or what he’s doing. They’re like Jesus’ dumb sidekicks like you have on old looney tunes cartoons for comedic relief.

Mark replays the day of atonement. Two identical unblemished goats. Pilate “sacrifices” Iesous the one called Christos, and he “releases” Iesous bar Abbas (Jesus son of the father) as the goat to be sent off to the wilderness to Azazel the desert demon.

When was Jesus crucified? Day before or day after Passover? It depends on which gospel you read (hey I took that straight from Bart Ehrman).

Pilate, what a nice guy, he lets Jesus’ followers take down his body from the cross after he dies… bullshite. The purpose of a Roman crucifixion was to let the body of the deceased rot for all to see, and for the beasts of the air and of the field to consume the body.

Matthew redacted and edited Mark. Matthew is not a separate account obviously. Two independent people aren’t going to write two stories that are word for word copies of some verses… without actually copying.

Luke copied and redacted Matthew and Mark. John was less lazy than Matthew and Luke and he copied and redacted all the gospels but at least put it in his own words.

The gospels all disagree with each other and with Paul on the very basics of Jesus. None are historically accurate.

quote:

But to say that Jesus never existed, I'd say you're in the minority with that view


Absolutely, but it’s because the majority are indoctrinated, uneducated, ignorant, unintelligent, or foolish. In my opinion.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27960 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

And before that it was Philistia.

And the only reason you can site this is references from the Hebrew writings. Which attests to the domination of that region by the Jewish people who documented and retained their writings to support their claims

The Philistines were wiped from the Earth around 600BC. Therefore, they have no descendants to claim that territory
quote:

The Philistines disappear from written history during the 6th century B.C. when the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II (reign ca. 605 BC – c. 562 BC) conquered the region and destroyed several cities, including Ashkelon.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61328 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

He makes no mention of anyone ever meeting an earthly Jesus
He's quite clear that he never did

quote:

Matthew redacted and edited Mark. Matthew is not a separate account obviously. Two independent people aren’t going to write two stories that are word for word copies of some verses… without actually copying.

Luke copied and redacted Matthew and Mark
Yes

quote:

John was less lazy than Matthew and Luke and he copied and redacted all the gospels but at least put it in his own words.
I think John came from a different source, as Raymond Brown writes about in his Community of the Beloved Disciple. It's not about not being lazy. It's an entirely different story. No parables. No mention of the kingdom of God, which is Jesus' central teaching in the Synoptics. No virgin birth, but rather a preexistent deity come to earth. All 7 I Am statements. The kingdom is in heaven not here on earth. And so on and so on

quote:

The gospels all disagree with each other and with Paul on the very basics of Jesus. None are historically accurate.
Which is why I cited none of that in my rationale for accepting the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth

quote:

Absolutely, but it’s because the majority are indoctrinated, uneducated, ignorant, unintelligent, or foolish.
I'm not talking about the majority of believers. I'm talking about the majority of scholars.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 8:11 pm
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
1839 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

No virgin birth, but rather a preexistent deity come to earth.


The pre-existent deity gospel - similar to Paul’s Jesus - is the Ascension of Isaiah. Not sure if you’ve heard of it, but it matches much of Paul’s theology of Jesus wearing a body of sinful flesh and being killed in the heavens by the archons, who wouldn’t have done what they did if they’d have known it was Jesus. But that was the plan, to trick the archons into killing Jesus in heaven because he was disguised. I have a copy translated from Coptic that is pretty good (translated by Charles). You can find it on Amazon.

quote:

I'm not talking about the majority of believers. I'm talking about the majority of scholars.


Of course. Most legit scholars work for universities. To be gainfully employed as a professor of Jesus-related studies at most of these institutions, one must sign an agreement that they will never publicly deny or doubt the existence of an earthly Jesus. They don’t have to believe in the supernatural, but they have to acknowledge that a real man on planet earth was named Jesus that the gospels are based on in some form. Many of these people were very devout and spend their life studying Christianity only to figure out for themselves Jesus wasn’t real… they’re pot committed at that point to be a professor of religious studies now that they’ve got a PhD and spend all their money on tuition. They have to keep up the charade if they want to continue their research and to teach and write books and collect a paycheck.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Genesis 12:3 is referencing Jesus. Not Israel.
The best interpretation I've seen is that it's referencing Abraham specifically, not the nation.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59055 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Which is why I cited none of that in my rationale for accepting the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth


So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring? I don’t think there are any.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111597 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Two independent people aren’t going to write two stories that are word for word copies of some verses… without actually copying.


Or alternately, they used the same oral tradition.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111597 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?


If you need contemporary references to prove people existed, just chuck your history books into the trash.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79322 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

I saw the meme on twitter. Who are they? Or what are they?

I just went to their website. They sell Bibles! And from the looks of it, very high quality Bibles.


Indeed, to my knowledge they're the biggest seller of Schuyler and Allan Bibles in the US. I wanted a nice/heirloom Bible for readings at our wedding and it has kinda spiraled out of control from there.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59055 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

If you need contemporary references to prove people existed, just chuck your history books into the trash.


Insightful.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111597 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:38 pm to
It’s insightful that you didn’t know that. Sure.
Posted by civilag08
Member since Feb 2011
806 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 9:57 pm to
I had to stop an reflect on Israel during this time a nation that had at one time forgotten their Savior loves them and He came for them and He will come again for them. It reminded me of this time of year, a Christmas song that reflects on the current times, even now.

1 O come, O come, Emmanuel,
And ransom captive Israel;
That mourns in lonely exile here,
Until the Son of God appear.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to Thee, O Israel!

2 O come, Thou Rod of Jesse, free
Thine own from Satan's tyranny;
From depths of hell Thy people save,
And give them victory o'er the grave.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to Thee, O Israel!

3 O come, Thou Day-Spring, come and cheer
Our spirits by Thine Advent here;
Disperse the gloomy clouds by night,
And death's dark shadows put to flight.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to Thee, O Israel!

4 O come, Thou Key of David, come,
And open wide our heavenly home;
Make safe the way that leads on high,
And close the path to misery.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to Thee, O Israel!

5 O come, O come, Thou Lord of might!
Who to thy tribes, on Sinai's height,
In ancient times didst give the law,
In cloud, and majesty, and awe.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to Thee, O Israel!
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41735 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Squirrelmeister
I pity you and hope the Lord changes your heart and brings you repentance and a saving trust in Jesus before you die. Otherwise He will pour out His wrath on you for eternity for not only your rejection of the truth but for attempting to lead others astray.
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
1245 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

And those same Jews chose to crucify him and continue to deny Him today. I’m a Christian but the evangelical boomer mentality about jew worship is crazy. Jews literally see Jesus as a false prophet yet evangelicals continue to give them unwarranted loyalty even when a lot of people in Israel aren’t even religious. The country of Israel today is not the same thing as the tribes of Israel from 2k years ago.




way to ruin a good circle jerk right off the batt
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61328 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?

I'm referencing the usual sources that are cited. Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews, Tacitus's Annals, a letter from Pliny the Younger, the Roman biographer Suetonius, the authentic letters of Paul (1 Thessalonians, Galatians, 1 Corinthians, Philippians, Philemon, 2 Corinthian and Romans) where he claims that he personally knew James the Just and Peter the Apostle, both of whom claim to have known Jesus, and the lost Q document, which forms the basis for the sayings of Jesus in the Synoptics. These, to me, are about as compelling an argument as we're likely to find when searching for proof of anyone's existence from that time and place.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 10:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram