Started By
Message

re: Florida's new Brightline high-speed rail b/w Miami & Orlando is popular among riders

Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:32 pm to
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
707 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

The piont is, there doesn't need to be one linking NYC and L.A. from the get go.

You focus on building regional one's where it makes sense (e.g., NE, SE, TX, West coast, etc) and go from there. Similar to what you see in Europe.

Just because it's a long way from coast to coast doesn't mean it doesn't make sense. Go look at China's rail system.
no. you can't move the fricking goalposts.

you need to try and keep up: the person i replied to said it's a travesty this country doesn't have high speed rail; as if we are the size of France. it's not a travesty, it's the reality that we are an enormous country. it's not far fetched to understand why we, one singular country footing the bill for the world's wants and needs, don't have as extensive of a network of HSR as dozens of other countries the size of Alabama.

nobody said anything about going across the country, but there's a very real, concrete reason we don't have a network of HSR: it starts with politicians and their vanity, and ends with a country the size of "their" continent, along with a couple of sizeable mountain ranges.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35558 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Country is too big for it to work


This sentiment is why America sucks now.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49828 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:36 pm to
Other than along the NE Corridor and Chicago our cities are not set up for intercity train travel.

They are not like dense European cities while also being farther apart.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16196 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

no. you can't move the fricking goalposts.


your entire opening premise was solely based on geography as you berated someone for not knowing elementary geography. You literally retorted to a guy that said "the hell it is" about saying the country is too big.

Who's moving the goalposts?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54808 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

I really hope more states and regions build high speed rail links between major cities and hubs

It would be nice and useful in some cases, but building it should not trump any other existing infrastructure project. Our shite is falling down around our ears. The longer we delay fixing it, the more it will cost.
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8384 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

I'd love to have HSR across this country. Estimates are that it'd cost 550 billion dollars.


LOL. The California bullet train from LA to San Fran is at an estimated $123 Billion to complete and not a single mile of track has been completed since it got voter approval 15 years ago. And when completed it will take 2 hrs and 40 mins. So twice the time and a higher cost than a flight between the two cities.

That's $123 Billion for 500 miles of track.



CA train costs
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 8:49 pm
Posted by bbeck
Member since Dec 2011
14567 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

mudshuvl05
Congrats on outing yourself as a dumbass
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
707 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:49 pm to
and you're the one talking about regional HSR lines: how much italics do I need to use to focus my point of contention, i.e., "this country." good lord son, stay on point.

again, try and keep up: this country is huge. it's a wonder we have the rail lines that we do. we are an enormous country, and if you know anything outside of the standard mercator projection map, you'd understand this. it's not hard to grasp why we, a singular country, don't have a rail network like europe; who's made up of dozens of tiny mississippi sized countries.

it's ignorance in the face of basic geography. try to understand that the op'er I replied to said, "this country," or don't- i couldn't care less if you can't stay on point. the point still remains: ignorance of the fact of the matter, no matter what it is, should be called out.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:51 pm to
Used it twice and it was great
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9435 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

It’s 36 minutes by car. What am I missing?!


Alcohol?
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
707 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:53 pm to
oh look, smoothbrain has a logical retort.
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
707 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

LOL. The California bullet train from LA to San Fran is at an estimated $123 Billion to complete and not a single mile of track has been completed since it got voter approval 15 years ago. And when completed it will take 2 hrs and 40 mins. So twice the time and a higher cost than a flight between the two cities.

That's $123 Billion for 500 miles of track.
that's proving my point. everyone knows that 550 billion dollar number is bullshite. that's politician numbers.
Posted by Sput
Member since Mar 2020
7972 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

Can we do Pensacola to Orlando so I don’t have to drive to Disney?


How about just quit being a kid fricker
Posted by Alpha Dawg
Milton County, Georgia
Member since May 2017
158 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:55 pm to
frick taxpayer funded transportation. Defund all that shite and only do it if private companies want to do it with zero tax dollars. That includes buses and subways.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16196 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:56 pm to
You had me going. Props, you're a talented troll.
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8384 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Same for the interstate system. Yet there it is.


Exactly. 75 years ago we had a need and decided that an interstate system was a better idea than a rail system. What is the need now? What does highspeed rail get you that cars/planes do not? I am not diametrically opposed to rail but without an entirely additional network of subways/local light rail in dozens and eventually hundreds of cities, what did you accomplish?

What you ARE left with is tremendous maintenance and operational costs for the existing interstate system, airports, AND now high speed rail lines.
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired
Member since Feb 2019
4659 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 9:01 pm to
The train system between Boston and NY and NY and Washington is great.
Posted by Permit
Stuart, FL
Member since Jan 2017
366 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 9:07 pm to
The Brightline screams thru our town (Stuart, FL) and I usually catch it. Three minutes later it's gone. Stuart, Ft Pierce, and Port St Lucie are vying for a station.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33954 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

This sentiment is why America sucks now.


Lack of common sense is greater
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37161 posts
Posted on 12/11/23 at 9:15 pm to
Next summer we are going to see the mouse for a few days then taking a cruise out of Ft. Lauderdale, then back to universal for a few days before home.

Plan is to fly round trip to MCO.

Working on getting from Orlando to Ft Lauderdale and back. Plan on renting a car but decided to look on up taking the train.

Round trip for 4 is over $500.

That seems insane. I’ll drive it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram