- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I’ll take Mark Williams and PJ Washington for BI and Val
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:57 am
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:57 am
Sue me
3
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:25 am to Louisianabound88
Cleveland: BI, Val and picks from NYK
Knicks: Mitchell
Pels: Barret, Quickley, Allen
Call it in, everyone can get what they want/ need, and Knicks keep enough ammo and salary to still pull off a KAT trade.
Knicks: Mitchell
Pels: Barret, Quickley, Allen
Call it in, everyone can get what they want/ need, and Knicks keep enough ammo and salary to still pull off a KAT trade.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:27 am to Soggymoss
I can think of a trade for all other 31 teams for BI, I’m done with this dude
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:22 am to Louisianabound88
You’ll miss BI if he’s gone. Promise.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:31 am to VOR
quote:
You’ll miss BI if he’s gone. Promise.
You might, but he’s needed to be gone for 2 years now for the sake of this team
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:33 am to VOR
quote:
You’ll miss BI if he’s gone.
He's rarely on the court so it won't be too bad
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:00 am to VOR
quote:
You’ll miss BI if he’s gone. Promise.
He's been gone Baw
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:27 am to Louisianabound88
They could have just draft mark Williams
Or Jalen Duren
Or Jalen Williams
Or Jalen Duren
Or Jalen Williams
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:53 am to Lester Earl
This right here and add Kessler...drafting Dyson when we had 4 ball handlers, as well as Herb/Naji on cheap deals, and we were thin up front made no sense. It's a killer.
ETA: I think Dyson may end up being a nice piece, but it's still unfortunate, and this isn't one of those hindsight is 20/20 situations. A ten year old playing 2k could look at our roster and realize this wasn't a great move.
ETA: I think Dyson may end up being a nice piece, but it's still unfortunate, and this isn't one of those hindsight is 20/20 situations. A ten year old playing 2k could look at our roster and realize this wasn't a great move.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 10:56 am
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:03 am to Solo
quote:Dyson was drafted 8 overall. No one in their right minds would have taken Kessler at #8, not really valid to say we could have gotten him. It's not realistic.
This right here and add Kessler...drafting Dyson when we had 4 ball handlers,
In hindsight, it's obvious. In the moment, no one had Kessler being what he's been, which is why he went 22 overall.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:08 am to shel311
The point is that Kessler is a front court player, but yes, he wasn't going to be drafted at 8.
ETA: Add Sochan to this debate.
ETA: Add Sochan to this debate.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 11:11 am
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:38 am to Louisianabound88
quote:
Sue me
For stupidity??
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:47 am to Solo
quote:
ETA: I think Dyson may end up being a nice piece, but it's still unfortunate, and this isn't one of those hindsight is 20/20 situations. A ten year old playing 2k could look at our roster and realize this wasn't a great move.
I admit I was a slight lean to Sochan over Dyson but even with Dyson's struggles, I think I will be proved wrong on that one. Dyson will eventually be a very solid performer, for the Pels...jmo
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:49 am to Dinky Mulberry
I hope you’re right because I love Dyson’s defense. But I just wish the kid would crack double digit scoring once in a while. Especially when we’re lacking scoring depth.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:55 am to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
I admit I was a slight lean to Sochan over Dyson but even with Dyson's struggles, I think I will be proved wrong on that one. Dyson will eventually be a very solid performer, for the Pels...jmo
We’ll see but the clock is ticking on his contract and he hasn’t shown much improvement in his offensive game. I’d take Sochan right now. Dyson hasn’t shown flashes like Trey showed early.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:57 am to Dinky Mulberry
quote:
admit I was a slight lean to Sochan over Dyson but even with Dyson's struggles, I think I will be proved wrong on that one. Dyson will eventually be a very solid performer, for the Pels...jmo
I agree. His defense is elite and I have seen some offensive improvement this year. Obviously the shot isn’t there, but as solid as his form is I think it eventually will get there. Right now with all the injuries we need more offense from him that he’s just not ready to deliver. Can’t really fault him on that.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:23 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
They could have just draft mark Williams Or Jalen Duren
The amount of people who assured me that drafting a center in the 1st was a terrible idea sure are eager now to use assets to look for an upgrade at the position…
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:50 pm to Solo
quote:
ETA: I think Dyson may end up being a nice piece, but it's still unfortunate, and this isn't one of those hindsight is 20/20 situations. A ten year old playing 2k could look at our roster and realize this wasn't a great move.
Almost every person on this board loved the pick. It's not hindsight is 20/20, it's revisionist history.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:53 pm to Louisianabound88
Looking more and more like the Lakers punked Griffin on the AD trade, doesn’t it?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:56 pm to PUB
quote:No, not really.
Looking more and more like the Lakers punked Griffin on the AD trade, doesn’t it?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News