- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Exxon and Chevron shareholders cut support for climate resolutions
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:17 pm
quote:
ExxonMobil and Chevron shareholders solidly rejected climate change proposals at the US oil majors’ annual meetings on Wednesday, scaling back support from last year and splitting with results at peers in Europe where resolutions related to global warming have won stronger support.
Only 11 percent of Exxon shareholders supported a petition calling for the company to set emissions reduction targets that would be consistent with the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. A similar proposal at Chevron received less than 10 percent support.
The vote tallies highlight differences between shareholder support for climate change action at US and European oil companies. Last week, 20 per cent of Shell’s shareholders voted against the company’s energy transition plan, arguing that it was not enough to reduce emissions. At BP in April, 17 per cent of shareholders backed a resolution to force the company to reduce its oil and gas output faster.
Unlike BP and Shell, the US oil majors have resisted setting targets for emissions from consumer use of their products because they would in effect force the companies to start reducing oil and natural gas production. Both of the companies plan to increase output, and last week Chevron spent $6.3bn to acquire US shale producer PDC Energy, adding new oil and gas reserves.
quote:
In the US, where Republicans have attacked asset managers’ voting behaviours, investor support for climate action has lost momentum. Last year, the Paris alignment shareholder proposals received 28 per cent and 33 per cent support at Exxon and Chevron, respectively, according to Dutch shareholder activist Follow This, which filed these petitions again this year.
quote:
The votes came after a change in public perceptions over the past year, as Russia’s war in Ukraine drove up fuel prices and gave renewed emphasis to energy security alongside protecting the climate.
quote:
On Wednesday, Exxon and Chevron faced 13 shareholder proposals related to carbon emissions or climate change. Only one petition received more than 20 per cent support, a threshold regarded as a strong sign of investor dissent. About 36 per cent of shareholders supported a proposal asking Exxon to report more about its methane emissions.
quote:
Exxon fired back at van Baal, arguing he has said publicly that his shareholder proposal is meant to be a “Trojan horse” to force companies to eliminate oil and natural gas investments.
LINK
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:20 pm to ragincajun03
So investors want their money, not chase rainbows and unicorns.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:31 pm to ragincajun03
As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority.
Fossil fuels and Nuclear are the fricking best, and it's not even close.
Fossil fuels and Nuclear are the fricking best, and it's not even close.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to Vols&Shaft83
The rest of it is a grift.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Fossil fuels and Nuclear are the fricking best, and it's not even close.
Have done more for the betterment of our society than damn near anything.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:35 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority.
Same
Proud owner of 300 shares CVX and 500 shares XOM
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:36 pm to ragincajun03
We need to increase emissions
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:36 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Scientists have said there are no fossils below 16000 ft. And wells today are much deeper than that so why the hell do we call it “fossil” fuels other than to give people the impression that it’s gonna run out.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:20 pm to Cosmo
Wish they would have made the vote a little more public, I would have liked to have voted.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:36 pm to ragincajun03
A little sanity in a sea of derangement. It’s tough out there folks. Stay strong corporate leaders.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:35 am to ragincajun03
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:20 am to killedbyindians
quote:The same reason it went from global warming to climate change. The same reason you say some one passed instead of died. They are controlling you sheep via language they are choosing.
Scientists have said there are no fossils below 16000 ft. And wells today are much deeper than that so why the hell do we call it “fossil” fuels other than to give people the impression that it’s gonna run out.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:27 am to ragincajun03

Now...we just need some shareholders to initiate lawsuits against them for their ESG bullshite for breach of fiduciary duties, since it is clearly contrary to the will of the OWNERS of the company
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:40 am to udtiger
Just came in from a 21 day hitch with more money in bank! Deepwater drilling is wide open.! Bb
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:44 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
As a shareholder in both companies, I am pleased to have voted with the majority
Same
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:52 am to ragincajun03
This is all some sort of global high jacked energy policy.
Ask these climatistas about the mining of the metals needed for these batteries… and they don’t have a clue .
They don’t know if the dangers to human life nor the impact on the earth that they’re mined from.
Ask these climatistas about the mining of the metals needed for these batteries… and they don’t have a clue .
They don’t know if the dangers to human life nor the impact on the earth that they’re mined from.
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 7:54 am
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:19 am to ragincajun03
This is what I tell my liberal friends…..”Until China, India, & Russia start abiding by the same rules as the USA then no deal.”
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:49 am to back9Tiger
quote:
So investors want their money, not chase rainbows and unicorns.

Popular
Back to top
