Started By
Message

re: Senator John Kennedy introduces bills to address rising flood insurance costs

Posted on 3/3/23 at 8:35 pm to
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
10037 posts
Posted on 3/3/23 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Senator John Kennedy
A National Treasure.
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13683 posts
Posted on 3/3/23 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

At the rate of inflation of policy increases, I believe it is conceivable that I would need to pay close to 10k a year for just 100k in coverage in about 10 years. That is insanity.


I think if it got to this point, your best bet would be paying off the mortgage and dropping the insurance, basically self insure by throwing 10 grand into a money market account every year
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31330 posts
Posted on 3/3/23 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Why does the National Flood Insurance Program exist? It encourages people to build and live in areas that the private sector deems uninsurable. It’s the definition of welfare and needs to go away.


I think I totally agree with you.

If I had to guess I would say that you can’t predict which prone areas will flood and people in non flood prone areas don’t pay in?
This post was edited on 3/3/23 at 8:43 pm
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11469 posts
Posted on 3/3/23 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Nothing like paying a premium to live in Louisiana. We get so many benefits.

From the 10% sales tax on all car purchases, to inspections, piss poor road, massive crime in your cities, and the sky-rocketing homewowner's insurance.....If I lived there, I'd be looking to move.
Posted by ChickennBiscuits
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2019
343 posts
Posted on 3/3/23 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

Agreed. Big government! Big Problems!


No one is stopping you from purchasing it on the free market.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20152 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 7:33 am to
I think I see a reason why the Biden administration is reluctant to release the algorithm.

quote:

Risk Rating 2.0: Equity in Action Guidance FEMA is pleased to share our finalized Risk Rating 2.0: Equity in Action guidance documents, FEMA’s pricing methodology for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The Flood Insurance Manual outlines the NFIP underwriting policies and processes to enable effective and consistent program implementation within the new pricing framework. The Risk Rating 2.0:Equity in Action Industry Transition Memo outlines how a policy rated with the legacy rating plan transitioned to the new pricing methodology. RR 2.0 NFIP Flood Insurance Manual April 1, 2021 Risk Rating 2.0 Industry Transition Memorandum W-21012 For a background and additional information about FEMA’s new pricing methodology, please visit fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/risk-rating.



It’s woke and it’s racist.
Posted by DCtiger1
Panama City Beach
Member since Jul 2009
8803 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 8:31 am to
Take a step back, do some fricking research and understand that the federal government has nothing to do with home owners insurance. You sound like a buffoon
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37174 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 8:32 am to
quote:

No one is stopping you from purchasing it on the free market


In my area, there are no carriers that offer private flood insurance unless you aleaady have the 250K NFIP coverage, and you are simply looking to purcahse additional coverage that only kicks in after NFIP is used up.
Posted by Scrowe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2010
2926 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 9:02 am to
No speculation needed, he has staffers that set him up with his southern zingers.
Posted by questionable
FL
Member since Apr 2008
1025 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

If someone wants to live in a flood zone

You know how I know you know nothing about S Louisiana? Many people who flooded recently weren’t in flood zones, their areas had never flooded before. You’re actually seeing it all over the country, rainfall rates and sea levels are rising.

I agree we shouldn’t build in these areas we know now are very high risk, but you can’t expect everyone to pick up and leave or be able to self insure.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37174 posts
Posted on 3/4/23 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Why does the National Flood Insurance Program exist? It encourages people to build and live in areas that the private sector deems uninsurable. It’s the definition of welfare and needs to go away. If someone wants to live in a flood zone the private market won’t insure, they should do so at their own risk.


If that happened, you would have about 5 million people owning a home that immediately loses 90 percent of value AND violating mortgage covenants.

No one could move away further inland without a massive amount of assistance…
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9429 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 6:52 pm to
Just got my renewal (zone X) and it increased 16% again. Second year in a row. Only thing that keeps them from increasing it more is the % increase is capped annually.

Getting tired of this.
Posted by lsutigers23
Member since Jan 2009
661 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 6:56 pm to
An elevation certificate would Help you it sounds like
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
7090 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:35 pm to
Maybe it's because only those in flood prone areas are required to have flood insurance? When the entire risk pool is high risk you get high premiums. The NFIP pays out triple what it takes it. This board may say what it wants, but the only way to reduce premiums is to require those in low risk areas to have flood insurance.
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19542 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

10k a year for just 100k in coverage in about 10 years. That is insanity.


Don't forget the part where they "go bankrupt" if you ever need to make a claim
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
114069 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 7:55 pm to
He is a fricking moron but he is a trump lover so the majority on this board would probably jerk him off if he asked them.
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
1726 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 8:03 pm to
Subsidizes bad decisions... that should be handled by private insurers....

No constitutional authority for it to exist.... like most govt programs

And i have it living near the FL coast
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9429 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 8:52 pm to
Flood insurance is not required where I live but these increases are getting ridiculous.

I’m considering not renewing.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124631 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

I swear that dude has a writer just to use for stereotypical southern sayings.


Now that, I say that statement is falser than granpa's teeth. Arguments got more holes than a small town speed limit sign.

Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25861 posts
Posted on 3/20/23 at 9:02 pm to
Transparency should be a no brainer.

I don't agree with the caps on rate increases. With transparency, it should be fairly evident if premiums are sufficient or need significant bumps.

I know it is frustrating to have coverage remain the same but to see double digit premium increases.
But if a kitchen used to cost $10k to replace but now costs $18k, you should be thankful to only see a 16% increase.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram