Started By
Message

re: Hiatus in Global Warming: The New Pause lengthens again: 101 months and counting …

Posted on 2/5/23 at 6:14 am to
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
12019 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 6:14 am to
quote:

We are living in the Quaternary Period. The Quaternary is an ice age comprised of >20 110K-yr stadial-interstadial cycles. The max-min climatic temperatures are fairly regular as is each cycle length. Ice core data shows CO2 and climate temp tracking closely. Higher temps are associated with higher atmospheric CO2 levels.

"Scientists" therefore claim interstadial warming is d/t CO2 forcing, and results from atmospheric loading secondary to volcanic eruptions.

Meanwhile, Henry's Law (a scientific law actually is settled science, btw) holds that partial pressure of gas contained in liquid increases (solubility decreases) as the temperature of the liquid increases. If open to the atmosphere, as temp rises, the gas will leave solution and enter the atmosphere. 93% of terrestrial CO2 is contained in our oceans ... i.e., a gas contained in a liquid.

So the volcano eruption CO2 climate-driving hypothesis is problematic for two reasons:

(1) Volcanic eruptions are random. Our quaternary climate cycles are not.

(2) If CO2 was the climate driver as claimed, volcanic CO2 emissions would warm the earth, oceans included. As the oceans warmed, they would release more CO2 which would cause more warming, which would release further oceanic CO2, which would cause more warming, etc. If CO2 was the climatic driver as claimed, once warming commenced, there would be no off-switch.

---

The sun is not an absolute constant.
110K-yr cycles would explain exactly the correlation of CO2 and temperature variance observed in ice cores. As the sun warms oceans, more CO2 enters the atmosphere. As it cools, CO2 reenters the oceans, leaving the atmosphere.


Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
5137 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 7:12 am to
quote:


Tarzana says global warming affects different areas at different times. So kinda not so global but still very dangerous and we need more taxes to fix



He also says that a spy balloon cannot lift a 1.4 megaton nuclear device because that’s just too heavy.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26471 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Increased CO2 is greening the deserts

The complete opposite is occurring. Semi-arid areas of our planet, with limited crop production, are desertifying, in the Southwest US, the African Sahel, and Australia. Mass migrations happening from the Sahel are rampant due to starvation.
quote:

I don't think CO2 is driving global temperatures in any way

Because your religion is the faith of climate denial. Go ahead, light candles at the shrine of Britain's Lord Monckton.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 9:30 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124572 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 10:09 am to
quote:

The complete opposite is occurring. Semi-arid areas of our planet, with limited crop production, are desertifying
Well ... there it is.
Right on time.

Warm air leads to evaporation, which leads to water saturated atmosphere, which leads to more precipitation, which leads to increased rainfall, which causes massive floo .. ooops ... uh .... massive drought and "desertification," because ... science.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13513 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Me, “Increased CO2 is greening the deserts.” You, “The complete opposite is occurring. … Because your religion is the faith of climate denial.“


LINK

Is NASA a religion Be-itch?!

C’mon Tarzan’s, get with the SCIENCE!


Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73680 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 12:13 pm to
dude, do you want tarzana to have a stroke here? he is a huge climate nazi! check his post history
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73680 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 12:19 pm to


there he is! climate sheep.

hotter during erik the red in greenland.

antartica core samples showed hotter 55k years ago.

sun causes climate change

Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11089 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 12:21 pm to
Wait, I thought the world ended around 2013 and all this was just a simulation?…
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19991 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 1:43 pm to

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19991 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 1:46 pm to
You take the computer sims. I'll take real science and history.

Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26471 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 3:35 pm to
That's a hugely deceptive temp v CO2 graph. It doesn't include the last 70 years of human history--current atmospheric CO2 levels are off the chart, at over 400 ppm. In 1950 it was ~250 ppm, still within an expected normal range. Since then, humankind, particularly in developed countries, have gone on an emissions jag like there's no tomorrow. As a result, the climate cross the globe is FUBAR.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
40172 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

The audacity that mankind thinks he is more powerful than mother nature is funny.

Your post was a good one, with which I largely agree. I wish you would lose this last sentence, which is ludicrously incorrect. Mankind can easily overwhelm nature. If all nations decided to simultaneously blow up their entire nuclear arsenals the climate on earth would be changed far more than the amount you ridicule the warmys for projecting.

They have beclowned themselves, but not because they think man can overwhelm nature - we can.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101890 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

there he is! climate sheep.


The most baffling thing to me, is how mad they get at the possibility that there could be evidence to show this stuff is not as bad as they are fearing.

Stuff like the OP is NEVER looked at as ‘hey, this could be good news.’
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73680 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The most baffling thing to me, is how mad they get at the possibility that there could be evidence to show this stuff is not as bad as they are fearing.

Stuff like the OP is NEVER looked at as ‘hey, this could be good news.’





tarzana and his commie dem ilk always proves us right as they have zero self awareness....by that i mean they continually prove they have zero objectivity, perspective, rationality or critical thinking skills.

Did GOD make this guy this damn stupid or did he choose to be stupid and ignorant? i will go with chooses to be stupid for 200 alex.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73680 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

emissions jag like there's no tomorrow.



disproves none of the below. shite and it still provides zero empirical evidence your climate change is from manmasde emissions.

hotter during erik the red in greenland.

antartica core samples showed hotter 55k years ago.

sun causes climate change

WE MUST DRAIN THE OCEANS TOO MUCH WATER VAPOR GREENHOUSE GAS! OH NOZ


Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124572 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

As a result, the climate cross the globe is FUBAR.
FALSE!
Not a single CO2-driver predictive climate model has held up precisely because your premise is false.

Yes, CO2 is up 130ppm over natural levels. Yes, climate models predicted at 420ppm we'd be in crisis mode. Yet, CO2 forcing models haven't smelled accuracy. Not one.

CO2 climate driver models predicted the Arctic would be ice free a decade ago, for goodness sakes.

Trying to duplicate Douglas Mawson's 1911 to 1913 voyage to Antarctica 100yrs later, in a horrible warmist embarrassment, the 2014 expedition ship got trapped in ice a couple of hundred miles shy of Mawson's landing point.

We have 250 yrs of consistent glacial retraction in Alaska evidenced in the historical record. No rate change. No variation. Yet every mm of current ice withdrawal in Glacier Bay is assigned w/o evidence to anthropogenic CO2.

None of it plays out

Posted by Ernaye
Member since Oct 2018
201 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 6:50 pm to
They created a endless cycle. Set a timeline for crisis. WHEN it doesnt happen, say it is because of the climate control efforts that was put in place. Rinse and repeat and the impressionable (youth) and dumb will eat it up over and over...fricking Brilliant really
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
10155 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

light candles at the shrine of Britain's Lord Monckton.

I prefer propane/natural gas flares.

That cool with you?
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Tarzana says global warming affects different areas at different times. So kinda not so global but still very dangerous and we need more taxes to fix

so that is true if the different areas are venus mars, saturn, jupiter and the rest of planets where a similar warming or cooling is observed to be like ours

HINT: it is that little star in the sky each day that gives us the statistical entirety of changes in climate
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124572 posts
Posted on 2/6/23 at 6:10 am to
quote:

so that is true if the different areas are venus mars, saturn, jupiter and the rest of planets where a similar warming or cooling is observed to be like ours
It's just a ..... 'coincidence'
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram