- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

150,000 Votes In The 2020 Election Not Tied To A Valid Address In Wisconsin
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:44 am
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:44 am
Zero hedge
Election Watch (EW), a Wisconsin election integrity watchdog organization, has discovered that more than 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election cannot be connected with a valid address.
EW computer analyst Peter Bernegger said the group’s study of Wisconsin’s voter rolls found 45,000 such occurrences involving people who were living out of state in the Nov. 3 ballot, with another 107,000 documented instances on the part of voters who moved to another address within the state and cast a ballot in a different jurisdiction from the one in which they actually reside.
“That’s over 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election that cannot be tied to a valid address,” said Bernegger. “That’s illegal in the state of Wisconsin.
“Though there may be a reasonable explanation for most of these, the number of instances is so large that if only two out of 10 were nefariously cast votes, that was enough to tip the election to Biden.”
Former Wisconsin resident Jacob Alldredge, a 27-year-old industrial engineer living in Tennessee, is a case in point.
“I was outraged to learn that the Wisconsin state voter roll shows that I voted in person at the polls on Nov. 3, 2020, when the fact is I was living, registered to vote, and voted in Tennessee. I was not in Wisconsin that day,” he told The Epoch Times.
“The entire situation distresses me because, without election integrity, your vote doesn’t matter,” said Jacob Alldredge.
Election Watch (EW), a Wisconsin election integrity watchdog organization, has discovered that more than 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election cannot be connected with a valid address.
EW computer analyst Peter Bernegger said the group’s study of Wisconsin’s voter rolls found 45,000 such occurrences involving people who were living out of state in the Nov. 3 ballot, with another 107,000 documented instances on the part of voters who moved to another address within the state and cast a ballot in a different jurisdiction from the one in which they actually reside.
“That’s over 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election that cannot be tied to a valid address,” said Bernegger. “That’s illegal in the state of Wisconsin.
“Though there may be a reasonable explanation for most of these, the number of instances is so large that if only two out of 10 were nefariously cast votes, that was enough to tip the election to Biden.”
Former Wisconsin resident Jacob Alldredge, a 27-year-old industrial engineer living in Tennessee, is a case in point.
“I was outraged to learn that the Wisconsin state voter roll shows that I voted in person at the polls on Nov. 3, 2020, when the fact is I was living, registered to vote, and voted in Tennessee. I was not in Wisconsin that day,” he told The Epoch Times.
“The entire situation distresses me because, without election integrity, your vote doesn’t matter,” said Jacob Alldredge.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 5:47 am to thebigmuffaletta
Anyone watching the election, the results, and policies that followed, know this was a crime.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:26 am to TigerFanatic99
Is 150,000 more or less than a smidgen?
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:44 am to thebigmuffaletta
The goose-steeper’s will be along soon to deflect from the major frickery perpetrated on the American people that night.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:51 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
“The entire situation distresses me because, without election integrity, your vote doesn’t matter,” said Jacob Alldredge.
I stood in line for half a day on the first day of early voting for the 2020 Presidential Election. Yep, my vote was meaningless.
The democrats stole that election from Donald Trump and from us. We know they stole it, and they know they stole it. This latest revelation is just more proof of the theft.
I hoped all that fraud was cleaned up by the 2022 Mid-Term elections. It was not. I leave it to you to imagine what awaits us in the 2024 Presidential Election.
Vote-by-mail and Ballot Harvesting is ripe for fraud.
This post was edited on 1/6/23 at 6:54 am
Posted on 1/6/23 at 6:58 am to thebigmuffaletta
Now’s the time to vote trump as SOTH and impeach the two, taking back what was stolen from him
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:04 am to Jax Teller
quote:
Bigly
Hugely
Which is why a true conservative will never win again
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:05 am to omegaman66
quote:
150,000 more or less than a smidgen?
author pointed out to you (confessed) that probably most of the 150k do have a legit "valid" reason. he then made up that "20%" were nefarious or rather could have been nefarious
thats 20% from out his arse. one can just as easily INVENT that the nefarious component is really only 0.1 but darn it! all the cheat votes were REPUBLICANS.
this story went off half cocked.
get back to us after anyone demonstrates the facts and if there are any nefarious votes at all.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:06 am to CelticDog
Oh look a goose stepper we were warned about
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:07 am to CelticDog
frick off.
Virtually ALL of them are illegitimate to anyone with any semblance of integrity and common sense.
Virtually ALL of them are illegitimate to anyone with any semblance of integrity and common sense.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:17 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Anyone watching the election, the results, and policies that followed, know this was a crime.
The democrats fought like hell to push through lax voting laws for years, including mail ins for 2020…and they now fight like hell against anyone looking into those ballots. When issues like this pop up, they don’t want to discuss it. They have zero interest in election integrity. Sadly, they don’t understand the ramifications of conducting national elections that the majority of the people that actually show up to the polls believe in.
They think this is a game, like they are Alabama football and think they have just found the best way to push the limits. They don’t understand or care for the irreparable harm they are doing to the trust of the American people.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:18 am to thebigmuffaletta
Certified. That's all the democrats need to steal an election. Get them to certify.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:22 am to Zarkinletch416
quote:
The democrats stole that election from Donald Trump and from us. We know they stole it, and they know they stole it. This latest revelation is just more proof of the theft.
Of course…and they’ll just sit their with their shite eating grin, talking about our knowledge of the truth as “The Big Lie” because they know there’s not a damn thing which will be done about it.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:26 am to CelticDog
quote:
author pointed out to you (confessed) that probably most of the 150k do have a legit "valid" reason
That's not what he said. Even on the rare occasions when you manage coherent sentences you're still incapable of honest debate.
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:30 am to CelticDog
quote:
author pointed out to you (confessed) that probably most of the 150k do have a legit "valid" reason. he then made up that "20%" were nefarious or rather could have been nefarious
thats 20% from out his arse. one can just as easily INVENT that the nefarious component is really only 0.1 but darn it! all the cheat votes were REPUBLICANS.
this story went off half cocked.
get back to us after anyone demonstrates the facts and if there are any nefarious votes at all.
This is insane
Posted on 1/6/23 at 7:31 am to CelticDog
quote:
get back to us after anyone demonstrates the facts and if there are any nefarious votes at all.
1. Those that support election integrity support controls in the voting process to ensure everyone gets one vote, including measures to validate addresses as part of the voter roll and during the ballot casting process. Reducing control risk reduces audit risk (ie reduces the need to demonstrate fraud occurred after the fact). That is, the more effective measures in place,the less anyone needs to test actual ballots for validity. That’s the most basic audit concept there is.
2. There is a quote from an individual that says he voted in TN, yet there was a ballot cast in his name in Wisconsin. Anyone that cares about election integrity, regardless of which way the votes went, should be interested in how that occurred and stopping it in the future.
If you are against either of the above, you are simply biased.
But hey, red states, I think you have found a way to obscure (and some may say cheat) elections. Have your voters vote in several states if they are willing to show up in person and give you an address in that state. Let the cheat race begin.
Back to top
