- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Chicago Taps Brakes on Gentrification With a Tax on Teardowns
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:06 am
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:06 am
Chicago Taps Brakes on Gentrification With a Tax on Teardowns
(Bloomberg) -- Right next to the California stop on Chicago’s Blue Line, one-bedroom apartments in a new luxury building start north of $2,000 a month. Recently built single-family homes on adjacent streets frequently go for $1 million or more. Coffee shops and craft breweries have become neighborhood staples.
Scattered throughout: taquerias marked with a single dollar sign on Google Maps, and traditional duplexes and triplexes. These multi-unit dwellings have housed members of Logan Square’s Latino population since a wave of immigration in the 1960s, but lately the flow has gone in the opposite direction. The Latino population in the neighborhood has diminished to 36% from 65% in 2000, according to the US Census Bureau, as wealthy, and often White, residents find appeal in the area’s trendy businesses and proximity to The 606, a 2.7-mile railway-turned-walking and biking path that opened in 2015.
“Living in a gentrifying neighborhood is like living with a live and open wound,” said Christian Diaz, who was born in Mexico but has called Logan Square home for most of his life. “It turns our streets into an emotional minefield because it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here. And it wasn’t before, because it was predominantly Latinx.”
Still, Logan Square is not completely transformed. There is new, upscale development here, Diaz said, but less than some surrounding neighborhoods — in part, he added, because community organizers in Logan Square have found a patchwork way to slow the march of gentrification that’s spreading westward from the main commercial Loop. One key tool: a pilot ordinance that charges developers a fee of at least $15,000 for tearing down existing buildings.
The ordinance was born of the advocacy of Palenque LSNA, formerly known as the Logan Square Neighborhood Association, for which Diaz is the housing director. It’s one of a suite of policy interventions — including minimum density requirements, home repair grants and allowing additional units — that community organizers and Windy City officials have put forth in recent years to preserve a dwindling supply of affordable residential units. These are often found inside the two- or three-story townhouse-style buildings — like the city’s distinctive “two-flat” homes — that occupy the “missing middle” of the housing market.
“We still remain 4 million homes short of housing generally in the US, and so we can’t afford to lose any of the existing stock,” said Justin Dorazio, a research associate focused on racial equity and justice at the Center for American Progress, a liberal public policy research group. “But we also have a requirement that we keep the existing stock up to a decent enough quality,” he said — otherwise, unsafe conditions can drive displacement, with a particular impact on low-income people, people of color and people with disabilities.
Nationwide, at least 110,000 Black residents and 24,000 Hispanic residents were displaced from urban areas between 2000 and 2013, according to the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, meaning they won’t benefit from the economic growth and services that come with neighborhood revitalization projects. As more cities attempt to address displacement with zoning rules that allow for increased housing density, Dorazio said Chicago’s demolition fee and other preservation interventions provide a unique potential solution that works alongside new development.
LINK
(Bloomberg) -- Right next to the California stop on Chicago’s Blue Line, one-bedroom apartments in a new luxury building start north of $2,000 a month. Recently built single-family homes on adjacent streets frequently go for $1 million or more. Coffee shops and craft breweries have become neighborhood staples.
Scattered throughout: taquerias marked with a single dollar sign on Google Maps, and traditional duplexes and triplexes. These multi-unit dwellings have housed members of Logan Square’s Latino population since a wave of immigration in the 1960s, but lately the flow has gone in the opposite direction. The Latino population in the neighborhood has diminished to 36% from 65% in 2000, according to the US Census Bureau, as wealthy, and often White, residents find appeal in the area’s trendy businesses and proximity to The 606, a 2.7-mile railway-turned-walking and biking path that opened in 2015.
“Living in a gentrifying neighborhood is like living with a live and open wound,” said Christian Diaz, who was born in Mexico but has called Logan Square home for most of his life. “It turns our streets into an emotional minefield because it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here. And it wasn’t before, because it was predominantly Latinx.”
Still, Logan Square is not completely transformed. There is new, upscale development here, Diaz said, but less than some surrounding neighborhoods — in part, he added, because community organizers in Logan Square have found a patchwork way to slow the march of gentrification that’s spreading westward from the main commercial Loop. One key tool: a pilot ordinance that charges developers a fee of at least $15,000 for tearing down existing buildings.
The ordinance was born of the advocacy of Palenque LSNA, formerly known as the Logan Square Neighborhood Association, for which Diaz is the housing director. It’s one of a suite of policy interventions — including minimum density requirements, home repair grants and allowing additional units — that community organizers and Windy City officials have put forth in recent years to preserve a dwindling supply of affordable residential units. These are often found inside the two- or three-story townhouse-style buildings — like the city’s distinctive “two-flat” homes — that occupy the “missing middle” of the housing market.
“We still remain 4 million homes short of housing generally in the US, and so we can’t afford to lose any of the existing stock,” said Justin Dorazio, a research associate focused on racial equity and justice at the Center for American Progress, a liberal public policy research group. “But we also have a requirement that we keep the existing stock up to a decent enough quality,” he said — otherwise, unsafe conditions can drive displacement, with a particular impact on low-income people, people of color and people with disabilities.
Nationwide, at least 110,000 Black residents and 24,000 Hispanic residents were displaced from urban areas between 2000 and 2013, according to the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, meaning they won’t benefit from the economic growth and services that come with neighborhood revitalization projects. As more cities attempt to address displacement with zoning rules that allow for increased housing density, Dorazio said Chicago’s demolition fee and other preservation interventions provide a unique potential solution that works alongside new development.
LINK
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:08 am to djmed
This is why we can't have nice things.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:18 am to djmed
quote:
One key tool: a pilot ordinance that charges developers a fee of at least $15,000 for tearing down existing buildings.
Is this fee meant to curtail development or is it destined for the city coffers that will go towards things other than helping the citizens they claim to be helping.
Virtue Signaling is all that this is.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:26 am to djmed
So, we cannot have nice things because some other folks cannot have nice things...
$15K is not going to deter a developer, so it is nothing more than a money grab by the city...
$15K is not going to deter a developer, so it is nothing more than a money grab by the city...
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:29 am to djmed
quote:
Living in a gentrifying neighborhood is like living with a live and open wound
Holy shite

They're making my neighborhood nicer, which is like an open wound
quote:
it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here. And it wasn’t before, because it was predominantly Latinx
The lack of personal responsibility or belief is just amazing in these "conversations".
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:33 am to djmed
I love the logic.
If you leave these places to rot they scream racism due to white flight.
If you move back in and make it nice… they scream racism because the white people are building things.
What TF do they want?? I wish they would huddle up and tell us what TF they want. And “just sit there and live here like it is, vote for the POC every time, your theft losses are “unplanned donations”, and live in a shitty apartment because we can’t have costs going up is not going to fly.
If you leave these places to rot they scream racism due to white flight.
If you move back in and make it nice… they scream racism because the white people are building things.
What TF do they want?? I wish they would huddle up and tell us what TF they want. And “just sit there and live here like it is, vote for the POC every time, your theft losses are “unplanned donations”, and live in a shitty apartment because we can’t have costs going up is not going to fly.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:37 am to djmed
Remember that these people take the simultaneous positions that "white flight" is bad AND gentrification is also bad.


Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:40 am to CleverUserName
quote:
If you leave these places to rot they scream racism due to white flight.
If you move back in and make it nice… they scream racism because the white people are building things.
t-bass recommended a podcast a few days ago blaming white people for school issues. I listened to the first episode yesterday, and basically a bunch of (white) parents chose to send their kids to a lower-rated school in their neighborhood (instead of doing the city lottery system).
The school didn't have good test scores and wasn't seen as a good school (by the population). The incumbent parents immediately got mad at the new parents b/c there was a sense that the school wasn't good, and they were offended by that. However, the school literally was not good and didn't have good test scores

Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:41 am to djmed
You need to question any Latino who uses the term Latinx. Only like 4% of them like the term.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:42 am to djmed
So, Whitey can't live downtown because that displaces blacks and Latinos, but they also can't live in the suburbs with good schools and low crime because that's racist somehow.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:45 am to djmed
quote:
because it was predominantly Latinx.
There's your sign.
Latinos hate being call this. Someone is losing rent or section 8 status because white people are buying back the neighborhood.
Slum lords hate gentrification. This is why Tiger Land will remain a dump.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:54 am to djmed
These people need to be reminded that whitey built the current buildings/neighborhoods, and were pushed out. Stop whining when it comes back full circle.
We really need to learn how to fight the white cucks guilt in our society, as that's the only reason these people are given a voice for their lack of gratitude and respect.
We really need to learn how to fight the white cucks guilt in our society, as that's the only reason these people are given a voice for their lack of gratitude and respect.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:55 am to TrueTiger
quote:
This is why we can't have nice things.
This is why Chiraq doesn't deserve nice things
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:46 am to djmed
quote:
Christian Diaz, who was born in Mexico but has called Logan Square home for most of his life. “It turns our streets into an emotional minefield because it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here. And it wasn’t before, because it was predominantly Latinx.”
Anyone using "Latinx" is a fricking moron. We now know why they interviewed him for this anti-gentrification piece.



Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:54 am to djmed
quote:
“Living in a gentrifying neighborhood is like living with a live and open wound,” said Christian Diaz, who was born in Mexico but has called Logan Square home for most of his life. “It turns our streets into an emotional minefield because it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here.
It must be heartbreaking seeing his neighborhood getting cleaned up and friendlier.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:55 am to djmed
quote:
Chicago Taps Brakes on Gentrification With a Tax on Teardowns
If you want to tear that crack house down, you have to pay a fee.
What a time to be alive.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:58 am to djmed
quote:
Living in a gentrifying neighborhood is like living with a live and open wound,” said Christian Diaz, who was born in Mexico but has called Logan Square home for most of his life.
I have a solution for him, move back to fricking Mexico
Coming to our country yet crying about whitey moving into your neighborhood, the fricking entitlement.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 11:01 am to crimson crazy
It’s like that person forgot they didn’t own and we’re leasing their home.
Posted on 12/14/22 at 11:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The lack of personal responsibility or belief is just amazing in these "conversations".
The use of the term "Latinx" without irony tells you exactly where this dude is coming from. Didn't even have to read the rest of the article to know it was going to be "wypipo bad."
Posted on 12/14/22 at 11:28 am to djmed
quote:
it just seems like our neighborhood is valuable now because White people want to live here. And it wasn’t before, because it was predominantly Latinx.”
This anti-white bullshite is getting old, so people want to move in and improve these shitholes and the natives complain?
Sounds about right.
Popular
Back to top
