- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/11/22 at 7:15 pm to ApexTiger
I'll be interested if Trump is OK with releasing the warrant. But it's looking more and more like Trump is done relative to running. He can't run for office and fight off the DOJ. It would be best for the country off he concentrated on his legal issues.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:21 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
He can't run for office and fight off the DOJ.
Yes he can
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:28 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Trump's lawyer could notify the court that they are ok with unsealing both with an e-mail
they don't even have to do that... they have had both the warrant and the receipt list in their possession since Monday... at any point, they can just release it themselves... yet it still hasn't been... and you can DAMN SURE bet if it was a big dust up over nothing, both the warrant and receipt list would have come out by now...
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:31 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
Thank the Lord that Trump removed Garland as a SCOTUS candidate ….
what? Trump had NOTHING to do with that... literally NOTHING...
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:32 pm to ApexTiger
Would the warrant even give details on the documents they were looking for?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:32 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
But it's looking more and more like Trump is done relative to running.
how you figure that? if anything, i think this just solidifies it, and in fact, it speeds up the timeline, in my opinion...
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:33 pm to AUstar
quote:
Would the warrant even give details on the documents they were looking for?
warrant would list the statutes, while the receipt list would specify, more or less, what they retrieved
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:35 pm to chRxis
quote:
warrant would list the statutes, while the receipt list would specify, more or less, what they retrieved
Yeah, but would it go into any detail about the docs? Such as "Nuclear document #1" (lol).
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:37 pm to AirbusDawg
quote:
How did Trump remove Garland?
I thought the same thing, but somebody (I believe Laura Ingram) explained that Garland's name was still on the list of potential candidates to replace Scalia even after his first nomination was dunked by The Turtle. Trump removed him from consideration all together and nominated Gorsuch, not Garland, to replace Scalia.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:41 pm to AUstar
quote:
Yeah, but would it go into any detail about the docs? Such as "Nuclear document #1" (lol).
you want to specifically list the stuff BEFORE it's found? that's not exactly how that works... they had probable cause to believe sensitive documents were there, but they didn't know exactly what that was... it's not like he took page 42 of the Nuclear Handbook of the US Govt, and they were looking specifically for that page...
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:42 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Why would Trump not okay it being unsealed?
There will be lots of insane, illogical theories on here when/if Trump moves to stop this, but to answer your question the only logical conclusion, if he does this, is that he’s hiding something and being dishonest with his public characterization of the sequence of events. That’s it. We’ll see.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:46 pm to thatthang
quote:
the only logical conclusion, if he does this, is that he’s hiding something and being dishonest with his public characterization of the sequence of events.
pretty much... but you can bet your bottom dollar it will be attempted to be spun as some sort of 5D chess play...
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:54 pm to thatthang
We’ll revisit this when it turns out to be another giant nothing burger like the Russia collusion hoax and you Cucks are once again left holding your wife’s boyfriend’s dick in your hands
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:57 pm to thatthang
quote:
is that he’s hiding something and being dishonest with his public characterization of the sequence of events.
That’s it? Lol. Genius!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:58 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
He can't run for office and fight off the DOJ.
I watched a low-energy stalk of celery never leave his basement and wage a campaign in 2020.
Trump’s got 75 million votes in the bag if he runs tomorrow.
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:59 pm to thatthang
He is raising money off it why let air out of balloon
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:This is 100% right.
It’s not the warrant that matters. It’s the affidavit
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:03 pm to thatthang
quote:
There will be lots of insane, illogical theories on here when/if Trump moves to stop this, but to answer your question the only logical conclusion, if he does this, is that he’s hiding something and being dishonest with his public characterization of the sequence of events.
Or…
…maybe, just maybe…
…he’d be acting upon the advice of attorneys he’s paying a metric shite ton of money, and who know more about the situation than any of us.
Yeah, crazy, I know…
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:03 pm to thebigmuffaletta
There’s no need to get all emotional and lash out with these debilitating, feminine emotions. I took no stance on where this story is going. I simply answered the OP’s hypothetical question. If you disagree with my conclusion feel free to point out your reasoning, if you are capable of engaging in rational debate. That said it seems you’re most likely a woman, and many can’t really do that so they resort to these emotions. If that’s the case, no worries- you’re probably already back to online shopping.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News