- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Dr. McCullough:Study shows Pfizer vax reverse transcribes & installs DNA into human genome
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:35 pm
LINK
According to Dr. McCullough, who is the most published cardiologist in history, this is the first hard evidence that shows the experimental vaccines do, in fact, change the DNA of the person who is injected.
Dr. McCullough: “The news is buzzing – out of Lund University in Malmo Sweden… [this is] the first demonstration in a human hepatic (liver) cell line that the Pfizer vaccine in fact reverse transcribes and installs DNA into the human genome.”
Following up on Dr. McCullough at the request of the host, Dr. Bartlett broke the findings down in more simple terms. And, as he correctly points out, we were told this would never happen.
Dr. Bartlett: “So, basically, there’s an enzyme that can take that messenger RNA vaccine information and put it into the DNA of the person – into their DNA. And we were told that could not happen… the vaccine is messenger RNA. And we were told that messenger RNA could not go into your DNA, but this is showing that – in a lab – it can.”
Noticeably uncomfortable – and rightfully so, one of the panel hosts nervously asks: “If you’re pregnant and you have this done [take the vaccine] can that then affect your baby?”
Unfortunately, she got the answer she was dreading. Quite simply, yes it will.
Dr. McCullough continued:
“Yes. This is an alarming finding.
CDC says on its website – very explicitly – this [vaccine] will not change your DNA. The paper that came out of Sweeden – there will be many more to confirm it – and the steps are to: a) confirm it – to confirm that the entire code is installed. And then, to actually confirm that it [the foreign vaccine DNA] is expressed – meaning that the spike protein is now being continually expressed from human cells because the lipid nanoparticle has taken up everywhere – that means somatic cells in your organs, but also gametocytes, which are the cells that actually are the sperm and the egg.
If they [gametocytes] are carrying it, that indeed means it can be passed to the daughter’s [or son’s] cells in the embryo.“
The study: LINK
“Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.”
“In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells.
We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2.Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution.
We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure…
…BNT162b2 Enters Human Liver Cell Line Huh7 Cells at High Efficiency.”
“The Pfizer EMA assessment report also showed that BNT162b2 distributes in the spleen (<1.1%), adrenal glands (<0.1%), as well as low and measurable radioactivity in the ovaries and testes (<0.1%) [26].”
According to Dr. McCullough, who is the most published cardiologist in history, this is the first hard evidence that shows the experimental vaccines do, in fact, change the DNA of the person who is injected.
Dr. McCullough: “The news is buzzing – out of Lund University in Malmo Sweden… [this is] the first demonstration in a human hepatic (liver) cell line that the Pfizer vaccine in fact reverse transcribes and installs DNA into the human genome.”
Following up on Dr. McCullough at the request of the host, Dr. Bartlett broke the findings down in more simple terms. And, as he correctly points out, we were told this would never happen.
Dr. Bartlett: “So, basically, there’s an enzyme that can take that messenger RNA vaccine information and put it into the DNA of the person – into their DNA. And we were told that could not happen… the vaccine is messenger RNA. And we were told that messenger RNA could not go into your DNA, but this is showing that – in a lab – it can.”
Noticeably uncomfortable – and rightfully so, one of the panel hosts nervously asks: “If you’re pregnant and you have this done [take the vaccine] can that then affect your baby?”
Unfortunately, she got the answer she was dreading. Quite simply, yes it will.
Dr. McCullough continued:
“Yes. This is an alarming finding.
CDC says on its website – very explicitly – this [vaccine] will not change your DNA. The paper that came out of Sweeden – there will be many more to confirm it – and the steps are to: a) confirm it – to confirm that the entire code is installed. And then, to actually confirm that it [the foreign vaccine DNA] is expressed – meaning that the spike protein is now being continually expressed from human cells because the lipid nanoparticle has taken up everywhere – that means somatic cells in your organs, but also gametocytes, which are the cells that actually are the sperm and the egg.
If they [gametocytes] are carrying it, that indeed means it can be passed to the daughter’s [or son’s] cells in the embryo.“
The study: LINK
“Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.”
“In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells.
We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2.Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution.
We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure…
…BNT162b2 Enters Human Liver Cell Line Huh7 Cells at High Efficiency.”
“The Pfizer EMA assessment report also showed that BNT162b2 distributes in the spleen (<1.1%), adrenal glands (<0.1%), as well as low and measurable radioactivity in the ovaries and testes (<0.1%) [26].”
This post was edited on 7/11/22 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:38 pm to FlexDawg
Not surprising that everything we feared would come from this is being proven true.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:39 pm to FlexDawg
What are the implications of this?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:39 pm to FlexDawg
I was told this was literally unpossible.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:40 pm to FlexDawg
Somehow in the last decade, we figured out conspiracy theories are just truth being muffled.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:40 pm to FlexDawg
The vaxfags aren’t going to like this one bit.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:40 pm to FlexDawg
2020
Purebloods: Did you hear? Pfizer vax may alter your DNA!
John Q Public: Whatever! That's just a conspiracy theory! OMB!
Purebloods:
Purebloods: Did you hear? Pfizer vax may alter your DNA!
John Q Public: Whatever! That's just a conspiracy theory! OMB!
Purebloods:
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:41 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
“Yes. This is an alarming finding.
Four Alarm Sounded

Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:42 pm to FlexDawg
Hmmm I recall this was a conspiracy theory early on
Mark it in the “ yep it was true all along” category
Mark it in the “ yep it was true all along” category
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:44 pm to FlexDawg
Somehow “I told you so “ just doesn’t quite say it.

Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:45 pm to FlexDawg
"now here's why this is a good thing"
- CNN, probably.
- CNN, probably.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:46 pm to FlexDawg
At least the third time this has been posted. Wrong all three times. The Swedish study made no such claims.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:48 pm to Huey Lewis
quote:
What are the implications of this?
Trump prosecuted for Malfeasance and Negligent Homicide?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:50 pm to Huey Lewis
That the mRNA is permanently transcribed into DNA and inherited by any children. Could cause liver issues since is a gene affecting the liver.
This was shown can happen in lab/petri dish. Not yet known if happens in the body. But could analyze DNA or sperm and see? But they won't do this, so they can truthfully say "no evidence this is happening."
This was shown can happen in lab/petri dish. Not yet known if happens in the body. But could analyze DNA or sperm and see? But they won't do this, so they can truthfully say "no evidence this is happening."
This post was edited on 7/11/22 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:51 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
[this is] the first demonstration in a human hepatic (liver) cell line that the Pfizer vaccine in fact reverse transcribes and installs DNA into the human genome.”
bullshite!!
Jake 88, Korkstand, NCTigah and Cosmo assured me this could never happen
And they were adamant about it
Lulz
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:53 pm to AlxTgr
Study
quote:Looks like it to me but I'm no egghead and have nothing to worry about. Get to studying
Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:56 pm to FlexDawg
1) This isn't a new study. It was published in February.
2) It was run in vitro (on a dish), which means absolutely nothing in regards to in vivo (in an actual subject).
3) The concentrations of the vaccine used were absurdly high in these studies (ug levels give to a linear single layer of cells). 30 ug is the dose for an entire human, and they were putting 1-2 ug on a single layer of cells that are already effed up.
4) The cells used are not primary cells in anyway shape or form. They are an immortalized hepatic cancer cell line. These cannot be used to understand what would happen in reality in vivo and are basically manipulated to keep dividing.
5) Again, if they show this in multiple primary cell lines and then in animal studies, you have an argument, until then, this is meaningless.
This is exactly why you have some many failed therapies/drugs that work glowingly in lab studies. The results of in vitro work is just an initial look. It means very little on where something will work or happen in vivo.
I am not defending the vaccines as being perfect or without legitimate side effects, but you really need to take a breath and learn how scientific research works and what it actually means.
2) It was run in vitro (on a dish), which means absolutely nothing in regards to in vivo (in an actual subject).
3) The concentrations of the vaccine used were absurdly high in these studies (ug levels give to a linear single layer of cells). 30 ug is the dose for an entire human, and they were putting 1-2 ug on a single layer of cells that are already effed up.
4) The cells used are not primary cells in anyway shape or form. They are an immortalized hepatic cancer cell line. These cannot be used to understand what would happen in reality in vivo and are basically manipulated to keep dividing.
5) Again, if they show this in multiple primary cell lines and then in animal studies, you have an argument, until then, this is meaningless.
This is exactly why you have some many failed therapies/drugs that work glowingly in lab studies. The results of in vitro work is just an initial look. It means very little on where something will work or happen in vivo.
I am not defending the vaccines as being perfect or without legitimate side effects, but you really need to take a breath and learn how scientific research works and what it actually means.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:56 pm to FlexDawg
McCullogh is making some incredibly wild conclusions from the study itself. And the study is also based on a study where the SARS-CoV-2 sequences can also integrate into human cells in vitro through the same transposon. Why that isn't mentioned is curious too. Regardless, the study's claims are quite narrow and there needs to be a long line of evidence before you can justify any of the claims McCullogh made here.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:57 pm to FlexDawg
Double Post
This post was edited on 7/11/22 at 2:00 pm
Popular
Back to top


28













