- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. McCullough:Study shows Pfizer vax reverse transcribes & installs DNA into human genome
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:57 pm to FlexDawg
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:57 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
Dr. McCullough
Isn't this the nutjob who was trying to launder his anti-vax sentiments by claiming to be employed by Baylor, when in reality he had been canned months before?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 1:58 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
bullshite!!
You understand that this isn't what the study says, right? There is as of yet no evidence of actual integration into the cell genome itself.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:00 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
At least the third time this has been posted. Wrong all three times. The Swedish study made no such claims.
Can someone send the poor guy an audio readout of the study?

Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:01 pm to Geauxgurt
It's probably nothing. You're probably ok
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:02 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
1) This isn't a new study. It was published in February. 2) It was run in vitro (on a dish), which means absolutely nothing in regards to in vivo (in an actual subject). 3) The concentrations of the vaccine used were absurdly high in these studies (ug levels give to a linear single layer of cells). 30 ug is the dose for an entire human, and they were putting 1-2 ug on a single layer of cells that are already effed up. 4) The cells used are not primary cells in anyway shape or form. They are an immortalized hepatic cancer cell line. These cannot be used to understand what would happen in reality in vivo and are basically manipulated to keep dividing. 5) Again, if they show this in multiple primary cell lines and then in animal studies, you have an argument, until then, this is meaningless. This is exactly why you have some many failed therapies/drugs that work glowingly in lab studies. The results of in vitro work is just an initial look. It means very little on where something will work or happen in vivo. I am not defending the vaccines as being perfect or without legitimate side effects, but you really need to take a breath and learn how scientific research works and what it actually means.
Tell it to the most published cardiologist in history
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:02 pm to crazy4lsu
We are also told it was safe. And effective.
Now we have sudden adult death syndrome. For which experts are baffled.
Now we have sudden adult death syndrome. For which experts are baffled.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:04 pm to Damone
quote:
Isn't this the nutjob who was trying to launder his anti-vax sentiments by claiming to be employed by Baylor, when in reality he had been canned months before?
Are nutjobs typically the most published cardiologists in history?
Meh, you’re probably right, just stick with the narrative the government handed you.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:08 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
Are nutjobs typically the most published cardiologists in history?
Meh, you’re probably right, just stick with the narrative the government handed you.
Can he read a study? Because his publication record is irrelevant when discussing the wild conclusions he got from the relatively narrow focus of the study itself. And he seemingly fails to mention one major thing too, but alas.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Jake 88, Korkstand, NCTigah and Cosmo assured me this could never happen
How in the hell did I forget to list crazy4lsu?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:10 pm to crazy4lsu
Regardless there was no reason to chance a rushed shot for something that had a survival rate of 99.4%.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:11 pm to RobbBobb
Again, do you think that this study proves genomic integration? Very excited to hear your thoughts on Mobile DNA in Humans.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:11 pm to crazy4lsu
The downvoters should prob focus their effort on pressuring the govt and experts to conduct analysis and see if this is happening in the boddy?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:13 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Can he read a study? Because his publication record is irrelevant when discussing the wild conclusions he got from the relatively narrow focus of the study itself. And he seemingly fails to mention one major thing too, but alas.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:13 pm to FlexDawg
quote:Not my fault you fell for this...again
Can someone send the poor guy an audio readout of the study?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:14 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, do you think that this study proves genomic integration? Very excited to hear your thoughts on Mobile DNA in Humans.
The major problem here is many of these people simply clamp onto anything to justify their belief that the vaccines are pure evil, even when the studies are flawed or worse not even making the claims they are.
They want to trust a cardiologist over geneticists and doctors/scientists that actually are experts in this particular area. Somehow, it amazes me how much bullshite people will buy from someone because they have a non-relevant credential.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:16 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Not my fault you fell for this...again

Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:17 pm to FlexDawg
What’s the big deal if it changes your DNA a little bit? People should be thankful it can stop you from getting a cold. Or at least lessen the effects a little bit.
Popular
Back to top



3








