- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:50 pm to Sulu
They would just say he’s an “insurrectionists” and put him in jail.
See how dangerous it can be to speak against those who have the power.
See how dangerous it can be to speak against those who have the power.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:51 pm to Sulu
Barr is kissing the asses of people who called him a Trump lackey and wanted to impeach him, but bygawd he's not going to miss any D.C. cocktail parties for Trump or anyone else.
Stabbing Trump in the back has its perks.
Stabbing Trump in the back has its perks.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 6:15 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:53 pm to Sulu
quote:
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
Dd he ever say he actually looked at any evidence???
If not, then he should not have affirmed the result.
He only said he had not 'seen' any evidence. Didn't say even if he looked - just that nobody showed it to him.
I am disappointed in him - by speaking out as he did - he gave it the imprimatur of his office = but I have not seen one instance where there was ANY investigation of any sort done. It was just all based on 'they said it was all OK.'
'they" lied. and had reason to lie. and prove it by fighting any attempt for 3rd party oversight = it is all = "trust us" - and "don't bother us"
I will never be convinced it was at all "secure" - it is within the possibility that it was close, but that would have to be shown by something other than the statement of the winners.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:55 pm to Sulu
You would be screaming bloody murder if it were the other way around.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:56 pm to Sulu
Barr is protecting the institution.
Barr even set Trump up for all of it afterwards & J6th by stating in public that mail in ballots were rampant with fraud.
He even hinted at his specialty in recognizing and prosecuting seeping marxism in govt, subversion, destabilization tactics and how we were all watching it.
Then after J6th bait was set he did a 180 for the kill shot.
Barr even set Trump up for all of it afterwards & J6th by stating in public that mail in ballots were rampant with fraud.
He even hinted at his specialty in recognizing and prosecuting seeping marxism in govt, subversion, destabilization tactics and how we were all watching it.
Then after J6th bait was set he did a 180 for the kill shot.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 6:11 pm to Sulu
Statistics are broken frequently. Look at how many statistics are broken in one fell swoop with anything you’d like them compare that to the election and you have anecdotal evidence.
Then add to that the number of counties that determined the election, the behavior of those counties, covering windows where poll watchers were not allowed to view, video evidence where the polls were closed only to have suitcases of ballots unloaded, Biden’s vote trend line and the effort (or lack thereof) Biden put into campaigning, and you can see a really clear picture that massive frickery was going on. Enough to change the election? You can argue all day long one way or the other if it was “enough” but there was a LOT. Just look at potato joes voting graph. It shot literally straight up. Not subtlety up but straight up. Mail in ballots were going to favor Biden by a bit, but not in a straight up trend line. Why were ballots allowed and counted after the close of the deadline? Why were hundreds of thousands of envelopes discarded? Why are liberals so hellbent on not encouraging vote validation of any sorts. I can keep going if you’d like but this election has 0% chance of being legit.
Then add to that the number of counties that determined the election, the behavior of those counties, covering windows where poll watchers were not allowed to view, video evidence where the polls were closed only to have suitcases of ballots unloaded, Biden’s vote trend line and the effort (or lack thereof) Biden put into campaigning, and you can see a really clear picture that massive frickery was going on. Enough to change the election? You can argue all day long one way or the other if it was “enough” but there was a LOT. Just look at potato joes voting graph. It shot literally straight up. Not subtlety up but straight up. Mail in ballots were going to favor Biden by a bit, but not in a straight up trend line. Why were ballots allowed and counted after the close of the deadline? Why were hundreds of thousands of envelopes discarded? Why are liberals so hellbent on not encouraging vote validation of any sorts. I can keep going if you’d like but this election has 0% chance of being legit.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 6:46 pm to Sulu
quote:
Number of Posts: 53
Registered on: 2/9/2022
Lol nice try, Liz.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 6:58 pm to Sulu
He and all the others fall back on the same very lawyerly statement that the fraud wasn't "widespread."
As we have learned, fraud in only 1 or 2 counties in a few states could swing the election.
It was strategically targeted, not "widespread" or "substantial."
Lawyers being lawyers, being technically accurate, but prevaricating all the same.
As we have learned, fraud in only 1 or 2 counties in a few states could swing the election.
It was strategically targeted, not "widespread" or "substantial."
Lawyers being lawyers, being technically accurate, but prevaricating all the same.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 7:49 pm to Sulu
FBI serves search warrants on top GOP officials in Nevada.
Says it all. GO after the innocent.
Says it all. GO after the innocent.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 7:49 pm to Sulu
It's pretty simple, isn't it? What is the name of the person who should be charged? And after that, what would the charge be? If votes can be thrown out, who's votes should be thrown out? If I remember the movie 2000 Mules, there was only 1 mule identified, and you would have to know who's votes he was carrying. In Georgia, it is allowable for certain people to bring someone else's vote to a drop box. It's a narrow list and these mules were certainly ballot harvesting, but how can you prove anything without knowing the names on the ballots?
Posted on 6/23/22 at 10:43 pm to Sulu
Simply: you cannot arrive at that conclusion if you do not investigate.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:21 pm to Sulu
Bill Barr’s first job in government was as a CIA analysts when George H. W. Bush was at the director, that’s all you really need to know.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:41 pm to Sulu
He isn’t looking at the evidence therefore his opinion about it is moot. He is simply taking the side of the establishment. You can’t judge the evidence if you don’t want to even look at it.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 6:32 am to Sulu
What are your arguments that you no longer beat your wife?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:32 am to Sulu
It’s very simple. We assumed Bill Barr was on the side of trying to drain the swamp when he was actually on the side of the swamp.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:36 am to Sulu
quote:You mean, aside from the fact he never looked?
What Are Your Arguments Against Bill Barr’s Determination The Evidence Was Not Fraudulent?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:37 am to Sulu
quote:
Even the committee admits there was fraud. But there has never been evidence that there was fraud to a level that could have impacted the election.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 8:15 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:44 am to Sulu
PA, MI, WI economies were devastated under Obama. Those jobs weren’t ever coming back.
Trump comes in and waves his magic wand and those economies were BOOMING in Feb 2020.
Not a chance in hell those people voted him out. None. Zero.
Trump comes in and waves his magic wand and those economies were BOOMING in Feb 2020.
Not a chance in hell those people voted him out. None. Zero.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:44 am to Sulu
Not long after the election, Barr stated that he 'had not seen' any evidence of fraud.
I gave him the benefit of the doubt that he personally had not been presented with the evidence.
Since that time, he's either been willfully blind or lying...because the evidence is there.
I gave him the benefit of the doubt that he personally had not been presented with the evidence.
Since that time, he's either been willfully blind or lying...because the evidence is there.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News