- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why are there squatters rights?
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:35 pm
Watching worst roommate ever on Netflix and this episode is about a serial squatter. Why was this ever made into law that someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process. Who was smoking what when it was made into law that it’s cool if someone does that? In Philly, once you have mail sent to the address, you live there.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:38 pm to couv1217
Never understood this legal concept.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:38 pm to couv1217
Yea, that one woman that got kicked out of her own apartment was crazy.The law that allowed that to happen makes absolutely no sense. Was NYC so I would expect nothing less.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:40 pm to couv1217
This. This is a good thread.
Squatters' Rights and Civil Forfeiture make no damn sense.
Squatters' Rights and Civil Forfeiture make no damn sense.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to LSUBoo
Civil forfeiture is state sanctioned theft. Disgusting.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to couv1217
Squatter’s Rights is an English common law concept that carried over to America at some point.
And the concept even has ancient Roman origins.
From Wikipedia:
Edit: Essentially, the concept is to limit the conflict that would exist if someone were to buy a piece of land and abandon it for 40 years, leaving no trace of ownership, and for someone to move in and establish some residence under good faith and then have the original owner show up and claim original ownership.
The law says, in order to maintain possession, you must make a good faith effort to publicize your ownership.
Now, how the law has been perverted over time is another story.
And the concept even has ancient Roman origins.
From Wikipedia:
quote:
In Roman law, usucapio laws allowed someone who was in possession of a good without title to become the lawful proprietor if the original owner did not appear after some time (one or two years), unless the good was obtained illegally (by theft or force). Stemming from Roman law and its successor, the Napoleonic Code, adopted as the basis of law in France, Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, and also, in part, by the Netherlands and Germany, adverse possession generally recognises two time periods for the acquisition of property: 30 years and some lesser time period, depending on the bona fides of the possessor and the location of the parties involved.[citation needed] Parliament passed England's first general statute limiting the right to recover possession of land in 1623.[5
Edit: Essentially, the concept is to limit the conflict that would exist if someone were to buy a piece of land and abandon it for 40 years, leaving no trace of ownership, and for someone to move in and establish some residence under good faith and then have the original owner show up and claim original ownership.
The law says, in order to maintain possession, you must make a good faith effort to publicize your ownership.
Now, how the law has been perverted over time is another story.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to LSUBoo
Tell that to the male cops in Auburn who refused to let my go back to the house me and my ex had together to get the rest of my belongings because I hadn’t stayed there in 3 nights and she was well known.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:46 pm to couv1217
quote:
someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process.
Maybe you do, I don't. Someone every tries to pull that on me I tie them up and duct tape their mouth and dump them off in the middle of no where Mississippi.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:47 pm to couv1217
All I know is if I find some douchebags in either my own, family, or friends houses they will be leaving rapidly with missing teeth… provided they have some to begin with.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:52 pm to couv1217
quote:
You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested
So you pay a shady type to go there, throw them out and then burn all their stuff
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:07 pm to fr33manator
Yes we all know the solution. I’m just trying to figure out wtf did they exist and more importantly why do they still exist.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:08 pm to fr33manator
That is exactly how a slumlord buddy of mine handles it
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:08 pm to couv1217
Because plebs actually owning property is something the state can't abide.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:20 pm to couv1217
quote:
Watching worst roommate ever on Netflix and this episode is about a serial squatter. Why was this ever made into law that someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process. Who was smoking what when it was made into law that it’s cool if someone does that? In Philly, once you have mail sent to the address, you live there.
I don’t know the Netflix show well, but it seems like you are describing a roommate situation, in which one roommate has title to the domicile.
This isn’t really a “Squatter’s Rights” issue. It’s more of a tenant’s rights issue. Squatting is specifically a situation where the resident is inhabiting a property that has been basically abandoned and there is a conflict when the legal title owner returns and asks for the resident to be evicted.
The roommate situation you’re describing in the show sounds like a renter/landlord relationship which is governed by a whole other set of common law precedents and statutes.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:28 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
I don’t know the Netflix show well, but it seems like you are describing a roommate situation, in which one roommate has title to the domicile.
Homeowner allowed guy to move in as a roommate. Guy basically locked himself in his room and stopped paying rent. Homeowner tried to get guy evicted and ended up getting kicked out of his own house.
Squatters rights should not exist.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:52 pm to fr33manator
quote:
So you pay a shady type to go there, throw them out and then burn all their stuff
You just forgot about the burning down, collect the insurance check, sell the property and make a profit in today’s world and let someone else deal with the drama.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:01 pm to couv1217
fricking Democrats, that's why.
Any fricked up thing in this society can be directly traced to Democrats.
Any fricked up thing in this society can be directly traced to Democrats.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:02 pm to couv1217
This is why God created shovels and lime
Popular
Back to top
13













