- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kansas teacher wins federal case, will not be forced to use students' preferred pronouns
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:31 am
LINK
quote:
After a months long battle, Pamela Ricard has won her battle against transgender-accommodating policies being implemented in public schools across the nation.
Ricard was reprimanded in April of 2021 for failure to use a student's preferred pronouns, despite the school not having an official policy on preferred pronoun use at the time. The school later implemented various policies on the issue after Ricard was reprimanded.
quote:
Ricard sued the school after she was reprimanded, citing that her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated. In May of 2022, Ricard received a ruling by a federal court that her termination for failing to use students' preferred pronouns was unconstitutional.
The decision rendered the termination unconstitutional because her refusal to use the pronouns was based on her religious beliefs, specifically Christianity. This she cited as the reason she could not be compelled to adhere to the school’s demand, which was to call students by names or pronouns that were inconsistent with their biological sex.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:32 am to WPBTiger
Thank God.
Can you imagine if a schizophrenic student demanded that the teachers/staff acknowledged the voices in their heads?
Or if an anorexic kid wanted everyone to address them as "fatass"?
Can you imagine if a schizophrenic student demanded that the teachers/staff acknowledged the voices in their heads?
Or if an anorexic kid wanted everyone to address them as "fatass"?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:36 am to WPBTiger
My son had a friend that wanted us to use they/them as her pronouns. I quickly responded "no chance". To me, that's just bad English. She finally agreed.
I will call you by whatever name you choose. But I am not using crazy pronouns.
I will call you by whatever name you choose. But I am not using crazy pronouns.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:39 am to WPBTiger
quote:
she could not be compelled to adhere to the school’s demand, which was to call students by names or pronouns that were inconsistent with their biological sex.
BOOM MOTHERfrickERS
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:42 am to WPBTiger
This sets an important precedent, does it not?
PT lawyers, can you elaborate on if this will have bigger effects than just this woman getting some justice?
PT lawyers, can you elaborate on if this will have bigger effects than just this woman getting some justice?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:46 am to WPBTiger
Did SCOTUS ever put out a ruling about the teacher fired for doing a voluntary prayer after football game?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:47 am to WPBTiger
It was a pretty simple 1st Amendment case. Result was never in doubt.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:51 am to WPBTiger
quote:
that were inconsistent with their biological sex.
There is no such thing as biological science. There is just sex. Sex is based on biology, saying biological sex is redundant meaningless and playing into the hands of the crazy liberals.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:28 am to WPBTiger
Where ever someone implements one of these insane policies that I will be forced to follow, my preferred pronoun will be --
My f*cking king and daddy
My f*cking king and daddy
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:37 am to WPBTiger
The SCOTUS has already ruled that the First Amendment only applies to public employees when they act as private citizens and not when they’re in course and scope
of their employment.
Now that was on speech ground not religious, but I honestly Don’t see that being enough of a distinction.
And that was Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy ruling that way.
of their employment.
Now that was on speech ground not religious, but I honestly Don’t see that being enough of a distinction.
And that was Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy ruling that way.
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 9:41 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:53 am to WPBTiger
Kansas once again proves that it is a picture of real America.
More than Missouri will ever be.
More than Missouri will ever be.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:55 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 5/17/22 at 11:00 am to WPBTiger
quote:
Ricard was reprimanded in April of 2021 for failure to use a student's preferred pronouns, despite the school not having an official policy on preferred pronoun use at the time. The school later implemented various policies on the issue after Ricard was reprimanded.
So, did she prevail because the school had no "official policy" at the time she was fired? If the "policy" would have been in effect, would she have had no recourse other than to go work at a school that did not have a pronoun policy?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 12:08 pm to WPBTiger
Will the fools in Wisconsin that are illegally harassing middle school boys now so the right thing?
The right thing is to back off AND apologize to those fine young men…
The right thing is to back off AND apologize to those fine young men…
Posted on 5/17/22 at 1:12 pm to WPBTiger
I’m glad she won this case.
Someone is going to lose a similar case sometime soon.
The Marxists will not sleep until our nation has been destroyed.
Someone is going to lose a similar case sometime soon.
The Marxists will not sleep until our nation has been destroyed.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:46 pm to WPBTiger
frick all these people who insist on this inane nonsense.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News