- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:51 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:51 am to cajunangelle
The experts are right. This is just Trump artificially manufacturing an angle that made him the president last time.
If you can’t see that, you’re too far gone down the rightoid media hole.
If you can’t see that, you’re too far gone down the rightoid media hole.
1
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:52 am to boosiebadazz
Welp, that one's going into the ol' archives.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:55 am to Nosevens
Yeah. It could easily be applied to bringing it all out faster; and applying pressure to Durham to not slow roll and placate. Because the ones that run the DC show can't allow themselves to be exposed because let's face it the swamp gonna swamp protect itself..
The Fox guarding the hen house needs exposed ONCE AND FOR ALL.
Look at all of the things they accused Trump of and it takes sometimes years before their gas lighting lies are exposed.
It could help bring it about faster.
The Fox guarding the hen house needs exposed ONCE AND FOR ALL.
Look at all of the things they accused Trump of and it takes sometimes years before their gas lighting lies are exposed.
It could help bring it about faster.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:57 am to cajunangelle
Yeah I think lolsuit is spot on.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:57 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
She has no experience in RICO litigation at all.
But Rudy does and we know he is invloved
Muh Rudys hair streaks tho
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:58 am to boosiebadazz
Next time you’re over that way on The Bluff please tell Lacumba I said what’s up.
Go Jags!!
Go Jags!!
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:00 am to cajunangelle
Yeah. The real experts are Powell, Wood, and Giuliani. Lol.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:02 am to Placekicker
quote:He's not very good at hiring people.
But, Trump is not a dumb man. There has to be a reason he hired her, right??
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:05 am to NC_Tigah
Re: the ditzy-like TV lawyer. Your worries are validated
The other lawyers will do the legal work. She is a pretty face for TV.
quote:Maybe we shouldn't be so worried as the article implies she is eye candy and a mouthpiece.
The One Trump Lawyer the Rest of Trump’s Legal Team Loathes
The other lawyers will do the legal work. She is a pretty face for TV.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:09 am to boosiebadazz
quote:What makes the lower rated schools shitty?
quote:
Didn't you go to Southern Law?
Yep. And as a shitty lawyer myself,
A.) They don't bother to teach all of the material?
B.) Their professors aren't well known or recognized leaders?
C.) Their graduates, being less exceptional students, don't do well on the bar exam but there is nothing much the professors could have done?
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:09 am to boosiebadazz
quote:No. You go ahead and tell me how the recusal game works.
But go ahead and tell us who on the 11th Circuit and the Supreme Court should recuse themselves from this case based on who appointed them.
Jeff Sessions worked in the Trump Campaign completely peripheral to the bullshite Russian narrative, yet emotional screeching howls emanated from every orifice of the legal establishment for his recusal. It led to his withdrawal, and opened the door for a festering false narrative which undercut a Presidency.
Meanwhile, U.S. solicitors general who get appointed to the Supreme Court have recused themselves from cases that they worked on. It was precedent .... at least until Elena Kagan decided she should rule AS THE DECIDING VOTE on Obamacare. Even libs thought she should recuse. Where were the cries and conniptions from legal "scholars" and "experts"?
With regard to your judge essentially being an appointee of the defendant in the case, WTF more do you want? It is a double standard evident to anyone with a brain.
THERE IS NO ROOM FOR DOUBLE STANDARD IN THE LAW.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:14 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:Artificially manufacturing an angle? ... You mean like his 'artificial claim' the bullshite Russia narrative was a hoax? That kind of manufactured angle? Have you been living under a rock?
This is just Trump artificially manufacturing an angle that made him the president last time.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:16 am to boosiebadazz
quote:But being a family lawyer, then jumping for the first time into RICO does.
after you’ve been out for a few years, where you go to school doesn’t have much bearing on the quality of your work.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:18 am to cajunangelle
LOL still muh russia!
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Artificially manufacturing an angle? ... You mean like his 'artificial claim' the bullshite Russia narrative was a hoax? That kind of manufactured angle? Have you been living under a rock?
This is ironic because I’ve repeatedly pointed out that the outrage cycle for libs between 2016-2020 is very similar to the outrage cycle for cons from 2020 to present.
The election fraud bullshite is just the exact same “we can’t accept the legitimate results produced by the election” as Russiagate.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:20 am to cajunangelle
Hyperbolic snap judgements given by people who know nothing of the evidence?
How very Democrat of them.
How very Democrat of them.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:21 am to Diego Ricardo
Oh I didn’t realize most all the most prominent national news outlets were howling nonstop (while taking whatever liberties they felt like in the moment) about a fraudulent election, or actually even extreme promotion of a fraudulent election, much as they did in promoting Russia obsession and hysteria.
This post was edited on 3/26/22 at 9:23 am
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:32 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
But being a family lawyer, then jumping for the first time into RICO does.
Agreed. You have a duty of competence and that can be breached by getting into areas you don’t know about. I refer things out all the time because it’s not in my area of competence and it’s cost-prohibitive for both me and the potential client for me to try to gain competency in that particular area with the rest of my practice ongoing.
This post was edited on 3/26/22 at 9:33 am
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:32 am to cajunangelle
But what does Rekieta Law think ? Just found the video and haven't had a chance to watch it.
YouTube - Rekieta Law
Go to 1 h. 39 m. in.
Bonus Rogan discussion 1h. 24m.
YouTube - Rekieta Law
Go to 1 h. 39 m. in.
Bonus Rogan discussion 1h. 24m.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:46 am to boosiebadazz
Seems like this is something that probably should have been filed years ago if someone was ever going to do it. Are there any material fact allegations in this suit that aren’t already timed out?
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News