- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

For those outraged about civilian casualties in Ukrain
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:37 pm
Just the other day, I watched one of the retired US Generals make the comment
“America doesn’t fight wars like that”
Does anybody remember WWII?
And I’m not even talking about the Atom bombs
We bombed the frick out of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians and cities
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:39 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
We bombed the frick out of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians and cities
We bombed and fire bombed the frick out of Germany.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:39 pm to Rohan Gravy
Do you want me to get up here and defend any state in any war? Not happening. Russia is fricked up too.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:40 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
For those outraged about civilian casualties in Ukrain
Nope
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:40 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:Your point is absurd. America didn't just invade Japan willy nilly.
Just the other day, I watched one of the retired US Generals make the comment
“America doesn’t fight wars like that”
Does anybody remember WWII?
And I’m not even talking about the Atom bombs
We bombed the frick out of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians and cities
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:41 pm to Rohan Gravy
On March 10, 1945 over 100,000 civilians residents of Tokyo died from our bombing. In one day.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:41 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
We bombed the frick out of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians and cities
quote:
We bombed and fire bombed the frick out of Germany.
This post was edited on 3/23/22 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:42 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Your point is absurd. America didn't just invade Japan willy nilly.
It's just not worth it
Just give the thread a blank stare and move on with your life
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:42 pm to Rohan Gravy
Hamburg Bombing
WW2 allied forces fricked civilians up here.
WW2 allied forces fricked civilians up here.
quote:
July 1943, code named Operation Gomorrah, created one of the largest firestorms raised by the Royal Air Force and United States Army Air Forces in World War II,[2] killing an estimated 37,000 civilians and wounding 180,000 more in Hamburg, and virtually destroying most of the city.
This post was edited on 3/23/22 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:43 pm to Big Scrub TX
We did not. We were attacked
But we did fire bomb Tokyo and Dresden for no military purpose. We did it to make our enemies want to quit
Same thing Putin is doing.
It is not an act of mental gymnastics to suggest that Roosevelt and Churchill committed “war crimes” far surpassing what Russia has committed this far
But we did fire bomb Tokyo and Dresden for no military purpose. We did it to make our enemies want to quit
Same thing Putin is doing.
It is not an act of mental gymnastics to suggest that Roosevelt and Churchill committed “war crimes” far surpassing what Russia has committed this far
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:46 pm to Rohan Gravy
We did the same in Iraq and Afghanistan
The US is no better than Russia or China or Iran
The US is no better than Russia or China or Iran
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:46 pm to LSUBadger
quote:
We did it to make our enemies want to quit
That's a military purpose
I think the distinction is we didn't (in WWII) start an unnecessary war without serious provocation AND THEN commit war crimes, as Russia is likely doing.
Skipping over the part where Ukraine was largely doing nothing and Russia decided to invade it and resorted to bombing civilian areas to try and break the will of the non-aggressor state is the absurd part
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:47 pm to Pettifogger
quote:Question: do you think this type of shite on this board is performative/trolling, or have actual college graduates become this deranged? This is a serious question.
It's just not worth it
Just give the thread a blank stare and move on with your life
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:47 pm to Pettifogger
Fair enough, now do Iraq. 
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:48 pm to Rohan Gravy
The whole point of any war is to force the opponent to submit both physically and psychologically. Everyone fought wars the same way. Only in the last 30 or so years of world history has so-called “surgical strikes” been a thing. Not every country has the capability or the desire to painstakingly avoid civilian casualties. It sucks, but that’s what it is.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:48 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Just the other day, I watched one of the retired US Generals make the comment “America doesn’t fight wars like that”
And we haven’t won a war since WWII when we did bomb civilians.
I don’t think you can truly win a war unless the civilian population says no more.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:50 pm to Billy Rocks
quote:
We bombed and fire bombed the frick out of Iraq
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:50 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
That's a military purpose
As distasteful as Russia’s and Putin’s actions might be, when Zelensky armed the general populace, he created an entire host of combatants that cannot be separated from the populace.
It is a military purpose as well.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:50 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Fair enough, now do Iraq.
I purposefully did not do Iraq
That said, I do suspect Russia has a more callous view of civilian casualties than we did in Iraq, regardless of the tally. But yeah, the pretext argument remains.
Posted on 3/23/22 at 8:52 pm to Billy Rocks
quote:
As distasteful as Russia’s and Putin’s actions might be, when Zelensky armed the general populace, he created an entire host of combatants that cannot be separated from the populace.
It is a military purpose as well.
If we're going to speak academically on the topic of warfare, yes, I agree. But if we're talking about the conflict overall, it seems silly and/or dishonest to skip over the unilateral nature of the conflict growing into an invasion.
Popular
Back to top

42




