- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Covid data will not be published over concerns it's misrepresented by anti-vaxxers!
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:02 pm
LINK
quote:
The PHS official told The Scotsman: “What is happening is people are looking at those simple data and trying to make inferences about the vaccination, whether the vaccines work, inappropriately and sometimes wilfully.
"There are so many caveats and they just pull certain figures out that should not be used.
"What we are going to do is do a lot more on the vaccine effectiveness side and try and make people understand how effective the vaccine is.
“For example we know it is 50 per cent effective against getting infected, but that it is much higher effectiveness against hospitalisations and deaths which is the key thing really as that’s what we want to prevent.”
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:04 pm to Seldom Seen
That is literally anti science
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:04 pm to Seldom Seen
Would not accurate data dispel any “misrepresentation”?
This post was edited on 2/17/22 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:05 pm to Seldom Seen
LOL.
Is this Covid data or Global Warming data? Because neither are supportable by the evidence and want to hide the raw numbers as a result.
Is this Covid data or Global Warming data? Because neither are supportable by the evidence and want to hide the raw numbers as a result.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:05 pm to Seldom Seen
This means the data is bad for vaxxers.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:07 pm to Seldom Seen
In other words... the data doesn't support our narrative and we're tired of trying to defend the positions we take so we're just going to stop telling you what the data says but we'll keep telling you how to live your life.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:08 pm to BigMob
quote:
Would not accurate data dispel any “misrepresentation”?
That's the old scientific method. You need to become educated on the new scientific method, and then stfu you racist climate change denier.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:09 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
50 % effective against getting infected
Haha
Yeah. No.
I have seen "vaxxed" overrepresented in ppl out with Rona at my site.
As have ppl I know at other sites.
It might actually be less than 0% effective against infection.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:09 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
In other words... the data doesn't support our narrative and we're tired of trying to defend the positions we take so we're just going to stop telling you what the data says but we'll keep telling you how to live your life.
“We don’t like what the data is saying and afraid you will call out all our lies so we are just going to hide it.”
And they call themselves scientists and consider themselves intellectuals.
Madness.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:10 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
“What is happening is people are looking at those simple data and trying to make inferences about the vaccination, whether the vaccines work, inappropriately and sometimes wilfully.
We can't allow people to cherry pick data to infer their own agenda!!
quote:
"What we are going to do is do a lot more on the vaccine effectiveness side and try and make people understand how effective the vaccine is.
So we're going to get to work on making the data infer our own agenda!!
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:11 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
“For example we know it is 50 per cent effective against getting infected, but that it is much higher effectiveness against hospitalisations and deaths which is the key thing really as that’s what we want to prevent.”
Then the data would fricking support that statement - if it does not, then either the statement is incorrect or the data is incorrect. Logic 101. She must have missed that class.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:11 pm to Seldom Seen
The misrepresentation IS the covid data.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:11 pm to Privateer 2007
This. Our local HS shut down 3 weeks ago for 4 days, lack of teachers and subs. Who was sick? The vaxed that's who.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:11 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
"What we are going to do is do a lot more on the vaccine effectiveness side and try and make people understand how effective the vaccine is.
They're going to tell the Scottish what they want them to believe.
Tyranny.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:14 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
people are looking at those simple data
Aw, then drawing conclusions should also be simple.
quote:
There are so many caveats and they just pull certain figures out that should not be used.
But Oh No! You're not an expert that understands caveats in SIMPLE DATA.
quote:
we know it is 50 per cent effective against getting infected
Roll of the Dice.
quote:
it is much higher effectiveness against hospitalisations and deaths which is the key thing really
Really? That's the key thing. I've heard of lowering the bar, but that's bottom of the barrel.
Also, Would you trust anyone to be an expert that says things like "it is much higher effectiveness"?
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:14 pm to Seldom Seen
I've said it multiple times... this vaccine push is a religion and it's based on faith, not data.
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:15 pm to kj993
This is an overt action by Gates. He's sending a message that only smart people will recognize....do not take the vaxx. He's helping the smart genes get carried on with successive generations.
This post was edited on 2/17/22 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 2/17/22 at 12:30 pm to GumboPot
quote:
This is an overt action by Gates. He's sending a message that only smart people will recognize....do not take the vaxx. He's helping the smart genes get carried on with successive generations.
If the vax was created by liberals as a form of population control, they're going to regret that their own voter base is the the majority of those who took it. . . I suppose the smarter ones will survive but not going to be the result he's hoping for.
Popular
Back to top

23







