Started By
Message
locked post

Would ULL be ranked wirh LSUs Schedule? Would LSU be undefeated with ULLs?

Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:48 pm
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24228 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:48 pm
This is a rebuttal to the Bull shite on USLs ranking.


Let’s have some fun.

There isn’t a team on ULLs schedule that LSU wouldn’t beat. Who on LSUs schedule where they played them would ULL beat?

Bama - no
Ole Miss - no
Arky - absolutely no lolololol - Arkansas would control the TOP and the LOS.
Mississippi st - no not even close if you watched the Arky St and Nicholas st games.
Auburn - no Tank would destroy them.
UF - no freaking way. Mullen would have destroyed them
UK - lolololol
UCLA - nope

ULL would be an 8 loss team with LSUs schedule and at worse LSU may have lost to UT, but would have blown the doors off of others especially because the players would have stayed.

Just retarded to think otherwise.

You can’t compare the 81st SOS with 16th. LSU was 4 until they played ULM YESTERDAY. That’s how bad the Sun Belt is as a conference.

Here’s how I know he isn’t all that and that team isn’t all that.
Wait - let’s examine that a little closer with the talent level you all proclaim he has recruited “with the number 1 signing classes the last 3 years in the Sun Belt.”
Barely winning against shitty teams with these great classes really speaks volumes.
He wants out of the conference before Butch Jones and Rich Rod bursts his bubble. He knows both of those coaching staffs are far better and Arky St has better facilities. His level is about as high as it will get right now.
People see through these dumbasses that are USL mouth breathers or Lester Earl wants nothing but to destroy LSU. He may actually be the real Lester Earl the worse PoS turncoat.

This was before yesterday’s games:

Here is Napier bull shite to end this bull shite argument and EVEN thought of him being a candidate:
Wins include against a SOS of 87th.
The only P-5 school they played, they lost by 20 to a 4-6 University of Texas.
All of the teams in their division of their conference have a losing record except So Alabama who is 5-5
In those wins includes a 1 point win against a 2-8 Butch Jones Arky State where it took the longest rushing play in their history or 99 yards which was the difference in the game. Jones absolutely out coached his arse that night.

But here is the kicker: their point differential against the teams below which have a combined 23-36 record against everyone else is a -2 total with their self proclaimed No 1! This is why you can’t look at record even within their own division and have to dig deeper.
Texas 4-6 lost by 20
Ga Southern 3-7 won by 8
Ga St 5-5 won by 4
So Alabama 5-5 won by 2
Arky St 2-8 won by 1
FCS Nichols St 7-4 won by 3
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 5:18 pm
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:49 pm to
ULL can’t beat Bama…



Riveting

Saban at Mich St probably couldn’t beat LSU
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:50 pm to
That whole ULl is ranked above these teams thread was one of the dumbest Napier threads I've seen in a while and that's saying something.
Posted by Imber
Member since Sep 2017
12998 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:50 pm to
You also can't compare the talent level between the two schools. Napier has consistently won 10 games in a conference full of teams with comparable talent. I don't know what's so hard to understand about this.
Posted by BornAndRaised_LA
Springfield, VA
Member since Oct 2018
5228 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I don't know what's so hard to understand about this.


They’re not attempting understanding. They’re just trying to build as many strawman arguments as they can.
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:56 pm to
Pretty sure this thread is the counter thread to ULL is ranked above these teams and not trying to knock the fact he's won 10 games consistently at ull which is commendable. Also, hasn't App state and Coastal Carolina also won around 10 games a year in the past few years? Where do you put those coaches on the LSU coaching search list?
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7956 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

You also can't compare the talent level between the two schools. Napier has consistently won 10 games in a conference full of teams with comparable talent. I don't know what's so hard to understand about this.
The problem is that his success at a lower level of competition doesn't mean he will have the same success at a higher level of competition (as it typically does not). The Napier fans think we should ignore that. He's got a lot of good qualities for a coach, but this one fact makes him a risky hire.
Posted by Eauxld Geauxld
Mississippi
Member since Dec 2005
1183 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

There isn’t a team on ULLs schedule that LSU wouldn’t beat.


I would have agreed with you before last night's game with ULM. Had ULM had any kind of quality quarterback they would have scored on those two possessions when they had the ball inside the LSU 5 yard line......and the unfathomable might have happened last night.
Posted by Imber
Member since Sep 2017
12998 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

The problem is that his success at a lower level of competition doesn't mean he will have the same success at a higher level of competition


That is true, but there isn't a coach who has been linked to the LSU search who doesn't come with certain risks, including Lincoln Riley.
Posted by Tiger Tracker
Austin,TX
Member since Nov 2015
7231 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:06 pm to
So where do you put the App state and Coastal Carolina HCs on the LSU coaching search list? If consistently winning 9-10 games in the sun belt is your barometer for success why not either of them?

Chadwell turned around coastal Carolina. Satterfield turned around App State and Clark has somewhat maintained that. Do you think they should be hired at LSU?
Posted by Enzos Tiny Pito
Member since Oct 2019
1843 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:10 pm to
ULL got skull drugged by an awful Texas team

Also LSU is most likely 9-2 with ULLs schedule but they're also firing their coach so if that's acceptable then good for everyone
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 4:12 pm
Posted by LSUJCC
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2014
201 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Saban at Mich St probably couldn’t beat LSU


Saban at Mich St lost to LSU, 45-26 in the Independence Bowl

So you are correct
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 4:12 pm
Posted by AP83
Cottonport
Member since Sep 2009
2709 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:11 pm to
So you want to compare a team of 2 and some 3 stars to a team loaded with 4 and 5 stars. Of course lsu is set up better to compete in the sec. what kind of dumb shite is this?
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
5001 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Chadwell turned around coastal Carolina. Satterfield turned around App State and Clark has somewhat maintained that. Do you think they should be hired at LSU?



Chadwell would probably be if he hadn’t gotten busted by the ncaa before and he’s never coached at a big time school which matters
He’s also being mentioned for Va Tech and Florida jobs

Clark has only been there 2 years - Drinkwitz was the coach after Satterfield for one year before being hired at Mizzou
If Clark continues to have success he will get a big time job
Posted by RazorBroncs
Harding Bisons Fan
Member since Sep 2013
13534 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

ULL got skull drugged by an awful Texas team

Also LSU is most likely 9-2 with ULLs schedule but they're also firing their coach so if that's acceptable then good for everyone


Honestly, how do people keep making this argument and not realize how retarded it is?

If you're insisting on comparing their schedules as if they're equals, then you have to compare their rosters, talent level, resources, and facilities too. Give Napier LSU's roster and resources at ULL and he's easily undefeated.

This argument about comparing their schedules is dumb AF
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17527 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:22 pm to
no and no
Posted by Enzos Tiny Pito
Member since Oct 2019
1843 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:25 pm to
quote:


Honestly, how do people keep making this argument and not realize how retarded it is?

If you're insisting on comparing their schedules as if they're equals, then you have to compare their rosters, talent level, resources, and facilities too. Give Napier LSU's roster and resources at ULL and he's easily undefeated.

This argument about comparing their schedules is dumb AF


I mean yes this would be the expectation for every LSU coach though

The fact that ed O might have dropped a game or two in the belt is why he got fired. Napier running train on the sun belt with LSUs resources and talent is basically what is required of him

Additionally they have a lot of advantages that teams in the SBC don't have

They have an indoor practice facility athletic cafeteria etc. If you think ULM for example has that stuff you're high. He also makes more then double the salary of every coach with a massive assistant budget.

He should be slamming the belt with ull it's not really a shock they have their stuff together there
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 4:30 pm
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
10887 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:25 pm to
Terry Bowden has ULM at 4-7, and he was very successful at Auburn previously. It's not always easy to predict what will happen when coaches relocate.
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7956 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

That is true, but there isn't a coach who has been linked to the LSU search who doesn't come with certain risks, including Lincoln Riley.
Agreed. All of them have risks, but compared to Riley and Aranda, Napier has a whole lot more uncertainty. Going from Sun Belt to SEC is not an easy transition.
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
7956 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

So you want to compare a team of 2 and some 3 stars to a team loaded with 4 and 5 stars. Of course lsu is set up better to compete in the sec. what kind of dumb shite is this?


Yet many want to compare a coach that is used to dealing with 2 and 3 star players and opponents with 2 or 3 star players with coaches that are coaching and facing 4 and 5 star players. What kind of dumb shite is that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram