Started By
Message

re: Why did O want to switch to a 4-3

Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19090 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

4-3 is antiquated against modern offenses, and due to the physical nature of players required to effectively use a 4-3, it's difficult to recruit for. HS defenses have adapted to HS spread offenses. You don't find that many high schools playing 4-3 any more.


This is my personal feeling for college ball. There are still a number of NFL teams running a 4-3 because they still have to defend the run a lot and the defensive secondaries are elite compared to college teams even on the bad NFL teams.

Aranda liked to run 2 big DL, 6 LBs, 2 CB's, and one deep safety. He did this to put the fastest athletes on the field he could against spread teams. When we went against strong run teams then he would go traditional 3 big DL...

Look at the players we put on the field last season:

Chaison
Queen
Phillips
Divinity
Delpit
Vincent
Stingley
Stevens
Fulton

All these guys had great range and all but KF, KV, and Sting were some sort of hybrid LB in function.
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:22 pm
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
21015 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:25 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/27/20 at 1:26 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66731 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:29 pm to
You don’t combat 4 wide sets with safeties.

There isn’t a defense out there who doesn’t use 3 CBS at least against 4 wide sets.
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 1:42 pm to
I am convinced that some people think the 3-4 was just invented in the last decade.

Majority of your snaps are run out of nickel in today’s college football so if you run a 4-3 that is a 4-2-5 with 3 cb’s and two safeties (base 4-2-5 is usually 3 safeties and 2 CB’s) and if you run a 3-4 that goes to a 3-3-5 with 3 CB’s and 2 safeties. On almost every single play you are rushing at least 4 towards the LOS and the offense knows who your base 4 rushers are now matter how many d linemen are on the field based on film study and tendencies.

Once you get to exotic blitzes and what not a 3 man front has advantages in being able to disguise blitzes, but a dominant 4 man d line that can get to the QB regularly without blitzing, which is what O wants, allows you to drop 7 in coverage and will lead to more TO’s.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23327 posts
Posted on 12/27/20 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

You have to understand playing defense in today’s college football has evolved immensely. You gonna give up yards and points, it something fans have to accept. It is about getting the stops and turnovers in the most opportune moments. LSU’s defense did that in spades last year


This year’s defense generated far more turnovers, especially turnovers for scores. We also created a lot more of a pass rush against all but Bama and maybe Auburn. The issue was Pelini’s unwillingness to adjust and scheme around our weaknesses. That lead to busts and big plays that often negated the impact of our own big plays.

With a better DC who can gameplan and make the right calls vs a spread attack, we should have a very good defense next year. The scheme and most of the players are there, including this recruiting class. We just need to plug a couple of holes and add better coaching and we should see a big improvement.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56417 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 7:58 am to
In today’s mobile quarterback spread offense works I would want as many fast versatile people on the field as I could, not fewer
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422962 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:06 am to
quote:

4-3 is antiquated against modern offenses

are you assuming that they're staying with the 3-LB base with 3-5 WR sets or something?

how is a 4-man line "antiquated" when most teams end up that way for a majority of the time to combat spread teams? we had 4-men down all the time with Aranda, for instance.

quote:

and due to the physical nature of players required to effectively use a 4-3, it's difficult to recruit for.

what? going back to a 4-man base set is helping us recruit better DL
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422962 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:10 am to
quote:

so if you run a 4-3 that is a 4-2-5 with 3 cb’s and two safeties (base 4-2-5 is usually 3 safeties and 2 CB’s) and if you run a 3-4 that goes to a 3-3-5

most 3-man base Ds go to a 4-man DL in the nickel. it's not a 3-3-5. sometimes it's labeled as a 2-man front but that's just trying to be clever

base 4-2-5 and 3-3-5 are different than nickel looks from a 4-3/3-4

gap assignments matter a lot more than how you label your down lineman anyway. there are 2-gap 4-man base Ds and combination gap schemes (like the Tampa 2, which had a 2-gap DT typically over center to allow the star 3-tech to attack a single gap of his choice pretty freely)
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 8:27 am
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13542 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Vandy scored 38


Not on the defense. This is such a tired fricking argument. 14 of that was not scored on the defense and 7 of it was on backups.

quote:

Ole Miss scored 37



Worst game of Aranda's career, and after that game they lit it up and were unreal, including throughout the post-season.

quote:

Texas scored 38



Texas, before they had a crazy list of injuries, was a very good offense led by an experienced QB. And that was a high energy home game. Also, Delpit getting hurt really helped them.



Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56417 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:07 am to
quote:

how is a 4-man line "antiquated" when most teams end up that way for a majority of the time to combat spread teams? we had 4-men down all the time with Aranda, for instance.
the vision laid out by O is not this
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34150 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:17 am to
LSU D played well first half vs ole miss. The D players admitted to relaxing after halftime with a huge lead.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422962 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 9:27 am to
quote:

the vision laid out by O is not this

you think O is dedicated to having 3 LBs out there in obvious passing situations or something?

I am not the biggest fan of O but a 4-man/1-gap DL line is not some terrible idea and most Ds end up that way against spread-passing anyway

what do you interpret O's vision to be, exactly?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31361 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:10 am to
quote:

You don’t combat 4 wide sets with safeties.

There isn’t a defense out there who doesn’t use 3 CBS at least against 4 wide sets.


Maybe but that's not a 4-2-5, that's a nickel or dime package. Base 4-2-5 utilizes 3 safeties. Now you can work all kinds of things in, like replacing a LB with a safety, and the rover with a cb.

But base 4-2-5 is a sam and will linebackers, 4dl, a FS over the top, 2 CBs on the outside, a strong safety that plays down like a wide outside linebacker and a rover on the weak side.

Can pkay with it a hundred different ways though. Here is a good article that explains it.

LINK


Breakdown of gary Patterson's version

LINK
This post was edited on 12/28/20 at 10:14 am
Posted by BEATIGER
35 Thousand Feet
Member since Jul 2009
658 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:27 am to
You have to have great players to have a great defense, no matter the scheme. We just didn't have the Joes this year. Many were young and they will develop to be hosses.

But our outside ends/backers had unbelievable trouble setting the edge until the last 3 games. Then you could see it start to click. Also, gap integrity on the d-line was problematic.

And our linebackers. . . Geez. Can't remember an LSU LB crew struggling like this - ever. There were flashes of brilliance that were islands in a season of missed tackles, and being out of position. I think this group will show the most improvement in 2021.

All of the above are problematic, whether running a 3 or 4 man front. But with new recruits and another year of strength and practice, should be better.
Posted by PennyPacker
Where things are bigger and better
Member since Jan 2010
1028 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:27 am to
With the safeties we are recruiting it sounds like this is what recruiting towards. Sage looks like he can be that Rover style of safety.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31361 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:37 am to
It's exactly what we are recruiting for and it's alot like what Aranda played many times with jacoby as fhe strong and Vincent as the rover, delpit at free.
Posted by bayou85
Concordia
Member since Sep 2016
8651 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:42 am to
quote:

We mainly ran a 4-2-5


You almost have to run 5 men in the secondary now.
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
5040 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 10:43 am to
quote:

It's exactly what we are recruiting for and it's alot like what Aranda played many times with jacoby as fhe strong and Vincent as the rover, delpit at free.




Clemson runs a 4-3 and they have 3 safeties on the field all the time like we did last year
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422962 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

It's exactly what we are recruiting for and it's alot like what Aranda played many times with jacoby as fhe strong and Vincent as the rover, delpit at free.

it's also what Chavis ran with TM7 as the slot guy. why he made so many plays
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53417 posts
Posted on 12/28/20 at 12:21 pm to
He’s a DL guy. There’s no other reason than that...
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram