Started By
Message
locked post

How do the USC facilities compare to the top programs?

Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:52 am
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
114487 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:52 am
Obviously, the weather and the LA glitter is a bonus.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481231 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:54 am to
i've heard from USC people that they're pretty shitty

*ETA: not miami shitty, but still

it's hard for the private schools to keep up with the Joneses
This post was edited on 1/11/10 at 9:55 am
Posted by Cash
Vail
Member since Feb 2005
37645 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:55 am to
Well bars fall on guys necks, so not good.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1855 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:57 am to
If the rumors re: NCAA sanctions are true, I find it very hard to believe a even somewhat reputable coach (JDR, Jeff Fisher) would even consider the USC job.

I'd think they'd have to reach for a coach desperate for a D1 job and is willing to ride out any sanctions.

If there are no impending penalties, then USC can pretty much hire whoever they want.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1855 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:58 am to
quote:

it's hard for the private schools to keep up with the Joneses

Why do you say that? Wouldn't a donor base like USC's have more money to throw around?
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 9:59 am to
They aren't all that great. If you have never been to the Coliseum, it is a dump.
Posted by CalTiger
California
Member since Jan 2004
3997 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:00 am to
quote:

ow do the USC facilities compare to the top programs?
i've heard from USC people that they're pretty shitty

*ETA: not miami shitty, but still

it's hard for the private schools to keep up with the Joneses


I know that the Athletic Department has its own budget but USC is an extremely rich school and has excellent academics to boot.

It has around $4 billion and must be in the top 20-25 in endowments.

Given their popularity in the last decade and the aforementioned info , in the absence of any link/first hand info from a USC player, I would tend to lean towards "the haves" than the "have nots"

ETA: I am not referring to the Colisseum - merely the campus facilities (even given that they have a small campus)
This post was edited on 1/11/10 at 10:02 am
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I'd think they'd have to reach for a coach desperate for a D1 job and is willing to ride out any sanctions.
John Brady will listen to offers.
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Given their popularity in the last decade and the aforementioned info , in the absence of any link/first hand info from a USC player, I would tend to lean towards "the haves" than the "have nots"


No. Have you been to the Coliseum lately? $C officials have fought with the Coliseum Commission about wanting better maintenance and upgrades. I was hoping at one point that $C would be able to purchase the Coliseum. Like most government bureaucracies, the L.A. Coliseum Commission is a waste of taxpayer money.

The other facilities are okay but not as nice as LSU or any of the SEC schools. Remember, $C is just south of downtown so there is no room to add more things.
This post was edited on 1/11/10 at 10:09 am
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33878 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:19 am to
quote:

$C is just south of downtown so there is no room to add more things.

like a parking lot?

how do you think the groundskeeper at the adjacent golf course feels after the football season is over with?
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39413 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:28 am to
quote:

like a parking lot?

how do you think the groundskeeper at the adjacent golf course feels after the football season is over with?



That's at the Rose Bowl, not the Coliseum
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:36 am to
It is ridiculous that y'all can't purchase the Coliseum. I would loved to actually see it repaired and maintained as opposed to the very slovenly job that the L.A. Coliseum Commission has done.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39413 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:38 am to
When Arnold was talking about selling off state properties, I was hoping we'd have the chance. There's no reason the city and state need it at this point. It's not like any major events are going to come there in its current condition. SC would actually put up the money to make it a usable venue again
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:41 am to
quote:

SC would actually put up the money to make it a usable venue again


I know. It is inexcusable how bad the Coliseum is looking these days. There are more and more cracks in it that need to be addressed. If SC owned it, those things would be repaired along with improving the grounds around it.
The Coliseum Commission is one of the biggest jokes in this city.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
74082 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Obviously, the weather and the LA glitter is a bonus.
If those were the 2 most important factors then Id go to UCLA which is in a much nicer area.

USC's facilities are pretty basic at the most. If they had Oregons, LSU's or Texas type facilities, imagine how great they would recruit
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33878 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 10:45 am to
quote:

That's at the Rose Bowl, not the Coliseum

ahh...right on
Posted by ornagestorm
Oregon
Member since Jun 2008
5105 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I know. It is inexcusable how bad the Coliseum is looking these days. There are more and more cracks in it that need to be addressed. If SC owned it, those things would be repaired along with improving the grounds around it.
The Coliseum Commission is one of the biggest jokes in this city.


How old is the Coliseum? I know it was around for the 84 Olympics, but was it around for that. Also as it been refurbished since 84? If I remember right, when they got rid of Hackett, they were saying that they would redo the Coliseum and make it better for the new coach. I never did hear if they did it or not.
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11612 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 11:26 am to
Pretty bad, especially compared with the big names from the power conferences.

The Coliseum is infinitely shittier than you expect it to be.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 11:27 am to
SC borders S Central and is an island surrounded by gangster neighborhoods, the Coliseum is a shite hole, and practice facilities and other infrastructure are sub-standard by SEC standards. The allure of SC is the winning brand, media coverage, and glitz of LA.
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 11:36 am to
quote:

How old is the Coliseum? I know it was around for the 84 Olympics, but was it around for that. Also as it been refurbished since 84? If I remember right, when they got rid of Hackett, they were saying that they would redo the Coliseum and make it better for the new coach. I never did hear if they did it or not.


The first football game was played there in 1923. It was the host for the 1932 Olympics as well. Some work has been done but not like it should be.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram