- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Find it hard to believe OM can pay 30-40MM in NIL
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:12 pm to RB10
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:12 pm to RB10
quote:
This is all bullshite. I actually have done the research, which is how I know you’re just making shite up.
Ok man. Be wrong and be arrogant about it. But you want to be right. I know I'm right. Have a great day.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:14 pm to GeauxBall
Again, tell us how Rev share gets the $30-40 mil for NIL without collectives.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:14 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Ok man. Be wrong and be arrogant about it. But you want to be right. I know I'm right. Have a great day.
Imagine believing Ole fricking Miss is spending more money, on average, than Texas for the last 4 years.
You are one delusional little man.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:16 pm to Yaboylsu63
Every school, EVERY school has a handful of rich billionares or $100m’s in bank.
$30m is the interest in a few months for these guys.
$30m is the interest in a few months for these guys.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:16 pm to RB10
quote:
Imagine believing Ole fricking Miss is spending more money, on average, than Texas for the last 4 years.
Your research is way off. Texas and A&M have spent way more than 20 Mil a year.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:19 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
Your research is way off. Texas and A&M have spent way more than 20 Mil a year.
No, they haven’t. That number is just now being hit. The average across all of P4 right now is roughly $13 mil. 4 years ago Ryan Day told his boosters the best roster in the country would cost $13 mil.
There were only two programs that spent more than $20 mil this year. Texas and Texas Tech. LSU spiked and got close this year. Ole Miss spiked and got close last year.
You are completely full of shite.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:20 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
Am I the only one that finds it strange that average Joes on the Internet think they have any clue how much money one university has or doesn’t have? I’m not even talking about just this situation, it happens all the time for all different schools
Like, where do you come up with your opinion? How did you come to the assumption that Ole Miss does not have this kind of money? I’m not trying to be an a-hole, I’m genuinely curious.
It's the same mentality that compels people to follow private jets and draw dumb conclusions from that. Everyone thinks that everyone else's college town is a total backwoods dump full of drunken reprobates, and every school is nothing but a hick school. So, if a private jet shows up in, lets say, Oxford, the only reason it could be there is for the football coach, because no one else could possibly afford it. And, only a very few schools have any money whatsoever, because most are hick schools in dumpy towns.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:23 pm to RB10
quote:
No, they haven’t. That number is just now being hit. The average across all of P4 right now is roughly $13 mil. 4 years ago Ryan Day told his boosters the best roster in the country would cost $13 mil.
There were only two programs that spent more than $20 mil this year. Texas and Texas Tech. LSU spiked and got close this year. Ole Miss spiked and got close last year.
You are completely full of shite.
Athletic departments and collectives don't disclose what they spend. If you are getting info from online sources it is wrong.
So you are telling me that EVERYONE in the conference got 18 million to spend August 1st and the only SEC school to go over 20 million was Texas ? It doesn't even logically make sense. You have no idea what you are talking about. Go do research on Rev Share. You have no idea how it works obviously.
If you are saying they spent 20 million on top of their rev share then I would buy that. But zero chance 20 million total for Texas.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:26 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
If you are saying they spent 20 million on top of their rev share then I would buy that. But zero chance 20 million total for Texas.
I’m talking about collective funds outside of rev sharing you fricking dunce.
Ole Miss is not putting up $45+ million each year a year for Kiffin, his staff and the roster, ON TOP of the rev share, every year.
It’s completely unsustainable and absolutely not happening.
You’re under the impression Ole Miss is a top spender in the conference. They aren’t. They are absolutely middle of the pack, and below both LSU and Florida.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:27 pm to RB10
quote:
Imagine believing Ole fricking Miss is spending more money, on average, than Texas for the last 4 years.
You are one delusional little man.
They don't even have top 20 talent. Terrible ROI, if true.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:28 pm to RB10
quote:
I’m talking about collective funds across rev sharing you fricking dunce.
This doesn't mean what you think it means. Let me educate you.
Each conference school gets 18 million to pay salary for their athletes. No NIL requirement. Show up and get paid.
NIL is on top of that and was formerly run by collectives. Now the collectives help guide NIL deal to players. They are the go between.
NIL and Rev share are 2 different pools of money. If you can't figure that out then you need to go back to 9th grade.
These contracts pools these school are claiming are Rev Share +NIL combined to make the number look bigger.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:28 pm to Yaboylsu63
They won’t be able to do it consistently. And with their reliance on transfer portal, a couple of misses on players will mean certain doom for their team as they have a weak recruiting base.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:29 pm to Yaboylsu63
quote:
Find it hard to believe OM can pay 30-40MM in NIL
A lot of rich old white people with nothing better to spend their money on.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:30 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
This doesn't mean what you think it means. Let me educate you.
Each conference school gets 18 million to pay salary for their athletes. No NIL requirement. Show up and get paid.
NIL is on top of that and was formerly run by collectives. Now the collectives help guide NIL deal to players. They are the go between.
NIL and Rev share are 2 different pools of money. If you can't figure that out then you need to go back to 9th grade.
I’m fully aware of this, you mental midget. Apparently you cannot comprehend that I am not referring to rev share.
Let me make it simple for you. Ole Miss is not sustaining $22 million each year for just the roster, on top of the rev share.
I know, I know. You think Ole Miss is already spending that, but they aren’t. That number is INCLUDING the rev share.
The new number from Ole Miss is $40 Mil a year. 40-18 = 22. That’s $22 mil a year Ole Miss has to provide, OUTSIDE of rev share. And that’s just for the roster.
Hence the stance, Ole Miss cannot sustain $20+ million a year, every year for the roster, on top of another $20 mil a year, at minimum, for Kiffin and his staff
fricking idiot.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:33 pm to RB10
quote:
I’m fully aware of this, you mental midget. Apparently you cannot comprehend that I am not referring to rev share.
You were the one talking about the last 4 years pre rev share and throwing numbers around like it was fact. When it absolutely is not.
Ole Miss has been on the frontier of crowd funding. You can look up article after article of how the Grove Collective is a model tons of P5 schools are using as examples.
LSU just wants their big money people to do everything. You don't understand how the game is played.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:36 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:
You were the one talking about the last 4 years pre rev share and throwing numbers around like it was fact. When it absolutely is not.
Because you said Ole Miss has been spending $20 million a year on the roster. They have not.
quote:
Ole Miss has been on the frontier of crowd funding. You can look up article after article of how the Grove Collective is a model tons of P5 schools are using as examples.
Cool. They still haven’t been spending $20 million on the roster every season.
quote:
LSU just wants their big money people to do everything. You don't understand how the game is played.
I understand Ole Miss hasn’t been spending $20 million on the roster every year.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:36 pm to 03 West CoChamps
quote:.
Athletic departments and collectives don't disclose what they spend. If you are getting info from online sources it is wrong.
How do you know ole piss spent over $20 mill then?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:37 pm to rutiger
quote:
How do you know ole piss spent over $20 mill then?
He doesn’t. He’s making shite up.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:39 pm to GeauxBall
NIL still very much exists. Revenue sharing just permits the schools to directly share revenue with the players. It doesn't eliminate NIL
When there is a demand, the supply side will find a way. The rev sharing won't have a huge effect
When there is a demand, the supply side will find a way. The rev sharing won't have a huge effect
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:39 pm to RB10
quote:
He doesn’t. He’s making shite up.
Kelly came out and said LSU spent $18 million on the roster this season, can he show us a quote from Lane about how much they spent? Im not holding my breath waiting.
Popular
Back to top



1




