Started By
Message

re: Crowton's last three years had some bad luck

Posted on 1/14/11 at 11:58 am to
Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8882 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 11:58 am to
I will still say that LSU won that many games in 08 and 09 in spite of Crowton, due to the amount of talent that was there.

Now, Oline talent was thin at one point, but all other phases were fine. The playcalling and usage of certain players will haunt my dreams forever.

Anything at OC will be better than Crowton. I'm sorry for hating on the guy as an OC, but I KNOW I am not alone.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23421 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

this is a myth
disagree.[quote]
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Trindon Holliday as a WR in the SEC. No excuse for that.


FIFY
Posted by rjokerlsu
Big Spring, TX
Member since Apr 2007
7494 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:15 pm to
Maybe so, but Crowton did not call the right plays to be successful with the athletes that LSU had. He also did a very poor job at QB development--Jefferson still has a slow release, Lee's footwork needs work. He was paid good money to notice those things & he did basically nothing to address things like this. He would often get away from plays that worked & didn't call enough screens and other plays that could have better used the talent the Tigers had.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481225 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

disagree.[quote]

who did we lose that would have started in 2009?

our LT, RT, and C were set and there is NO argument that we lost replacements there

LG - i admit this would be open

our RG was a started since 2007
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23421 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:19 pm to
i've bookmarked the thread to come back to it later; no time for an e-debate now.

















but you're wrong.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481225 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

but you're wrong.

3/5 are set without question

1/5 was open, i admit

1/5 had a starter who had started since 2007. also, as stated, stud refused to pull him when he was outperformed by a younger player IN 2009
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23421 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

3/5 are set without question

1/5 was open, i admit

1/5 had a starter who had started since 2007. also, as stated, stud refused to pull him when he was outperformed by a younger player IN 2009
you've said it 3 times in this thread. i'm clear on your position. just no time to debate it now......patience SFP you'll get your post count up in this thread later.

/postcountBOOM
Posted by TigerWerm
7th circle of hell
Member since Nov 2005
6050 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

who did we lose that would have started in 2009?


well, obviously we'll never know the answer to that...who knows how the departees would have developed

but here's a few candidates...

Jarvis Jones (starter at OU)
Zhamal Thomas
Matt Allen

Don't see how you can deny that attrition on the OLine was a contributing factor to the offense sucking in '08 and '09.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:10 pm to
Crowton was in an upward trend and deserved an extension
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4690 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Crowton was in an upward trend and deserved an extension
quote:

tduecen
Tulane Fan
Of course you do.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:18 pm to
The numbers don't lie, he improved the offense from the previous season to this past season.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4690 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

who did we lose that would have started in 2009?
How about these guys?

2005 recruiting class - only 1 signed
2006 recruiting class - lost 4 out of 6 OL recruits:
Matt Allen - 4*
Zhamal Thomas - 4*
Steven Singleton - 3*
Phil Loadholt - 3*
2007 recruiting class - lost 2 out of 4:
Ernest McCoy - 4*
Jarvis Jones - 4*

So over a 3 year time period (2005-2007), LSU ended up with 5 OL after signing 11. That's some pretty rough attrition imo.

At least one of these guys would have pushed the 2009 OL starters if not replaced them.
Posted by dos crystal
Georgia
Member since Aug 2008
4891 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

LT: black (returning starter)
LG: open
OC: hebert (anointed OC of future. we only recruited 1 other, PJ, who was on the team)
RG: hitt (returning starter)
RT: barksdale (returning starter)


quote:

what losses in attrition would have possibly started in 2009 OTHER than somebody at LG?


uggh, let see.

Jarvis Jones (starting left tackle for OU)
Phil Loadholt (starting tackle for the vikings)
zamal thomas
Earnest Mccoy
Matt Allen (starting center for atm)
Singleton
thomas parsons


i think a few of these guys with the guy's we had would have made a HUGE difference.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4690 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:47 pm to
quote:


LT: black (returning starter)
LG: open
OC: hebert (anointed OC of future. we only recruited 1 other, PJ, who was on the team)
RG: hitt (returning starter)
RT: barksdale (returning starter)

I guess I should also mention that 2 of the 4 OL you've listed were DL (Hitt and Barksdale) who were converted to OL because of the attrition.
Posted by IbalLSUfaninVA
Alexandria
Member since Jul 2008
3548 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

could teach Jefferson how to appropriately run an option.


Spot on, I already hate to run that play with him, knowing only 1 or 2 yard gain at best.
Posted by TigerWerm
7th circle of hell
Member since Nov 2005
6050 posts
Posted on 1/14/11 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

uggh, let see.

Jarvis Jones (starting left tackle for OU)
Phil Loadholt (starting tackle for the vikings)
zamal thomas
Earnest Mccoy
Matt Allen (starting center for atm)
Singleton
thomas parsons


i think a few of these guys with the guy's we had would have made a HUGE difference.


AGREED! At least a few of those guys would've been starters and/or quality backups.

His logic was flawed...just b/c someone was a "returning starter" from '08, doesn't mean they would have become a starter, let alone held on to the job, if some of those players had stuck around.
This post was edited on 1/14/11 at 2:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram