- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump administration urges Supreme Court to issue a decision in mail-in voting dispute
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:00 pm
LINK
quote:
The Trump administration on Wednesday reiterated its request for the Supreme Court to move quickly to block a ruling by a federal judge in Massachusetts that prohibits the government from implementing part of an executive order on mail-in voting in 23 states and the District of Columbia for the November elections. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices that “it is critical that the Court act promptly on the pending” request, which was filed on July 27 and has now been fully briefed for more than a week. “Otherwise,” Sauer wrote, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani’s “erroneous orders will effectively run out the clock on the government’s ability to implement Section 3 of the Executive Order,” which (among other things) bars the U.S. Postal Service from mailing ballots to voters who are not on the lists of eligible voters that the USPS will create “for the federal elections in November.” And that in turn, Sauer contended, will “caus[e] irreparable harm to the federal government, the public, and election integrity.”
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
We had a local judgment this week where the defendant was found guilty of voting here (mail-in) and in Maryland.
One of the main arguments from the defense was that there was no way to definitely prove that the signature on the mail in ballot was the defendant’s.
Not joking.
One of the main arguments from the defense was that there was no way to definitely prove that the signature on the mail in ballot was the defendant’s.
Not joking.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:27 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Trump urges the Supreme Court to do their fricking jobs.
Posted on 8/13/26 at 7:51 pm to TerryDawg03
Seems like something AI could actually do.
Popular
Back to top

2








